HI Vamsi, I'm not sure that comments in the commit would really help since the svk smerge
only looks at the actual files. What I would suggest is that I attach the synchronization
patch to a JIRA and ask that it be reviewed before it gets committed, and allow a day or
two for review. Would that
In the commits to branch\1.2 may be we should indicate in the comment that
the commit is meant for branch only. Will that help prevent those being
merged into trunk using SVK?
--vamsi
On 12/8/06, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hmm... This change was only meant for the branch
XmlParserApis were also removed in rev 483063. If there was no other
change made, it might be easier to revert 483346. Otherwise I will redo
this work tomorrow morning (EST).
Thanks
Anita
--- "Christopher M. Cardona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't used SVK before so maybe others can a
I haven't used SVK before so maybe others can answer. AFAIK this is the
first patch that was applied. Reading your comment on G-2594 you saying
xmlParserApis and xalan is not necessary in trunk so do we need to
revert this?
Thanks,
chris
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
hmm... This change was o
hmm... This change was only meant for the branch. I wonder what else
was synched up.. Is there a way to say that a certain change is meant
for a branch only, and should not be merged to the trunk?
Thanks
Anita
--- "Christopher M. Cardona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anita,
>
> This change
Anita,
This change was made in branches/1.2 and so trunk is being synched up.
Best wishes,
chris
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Chris,
This commit added xalan to the assembly. Is it intentional?
Thanks
Anita
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ccardona
Date: Wed Dec 6 21:14:16 2006
New
Chris,
This commit added xalan to the assembly. Is it intentional?
Thanks
Anita
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: ccardona
> Date: Wed Dec 6 21:14:16 2006
> New Revision: 483346
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=483346
> Log:
> GERONIMO-2633 : SVK synchronization patc
