Re: sandbox/messaging - your feedbacks are welcome

2004-07-21 Thread jastrachan
For clustering, we've been working quite heavily for some time on this abstraction... http://activecluster.codehaus.org/ (Note that ActiveCluster is not Geronimo specific and so can be used to build clusters or anything). The current implementation works on top of any JMS provider, such as

Re: sandbox/messaging - your feedbacks are welcome

2004-07-21 Thread Gianny Damour
On 21/07/2004 5:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For clustering, we've been working quite heavily for some time on this abstraction... http://activecluster.codehaus.org/ (Note that ActiveCluster is not Geronimo specific and so can be used to build clusters or anything). The current

Re: sandbox/messaging - your feedbacks are welcome

2004-07-21 Thread jastrachan
On 21 Jul 2004, at 12:22, Gianny Damour wrote: On 21/07/2004 5:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For clustering, we've been working quite heavily for some time on this abstraction... http://activecluster.codehaus.org/ (Note that ActiveCluster is not Geronimo specific and so can be used to

sandbox/messaging - your feedbacks are welcome

2004-07-20 Thread Gianny Damour
Hello, I am working on a prototype, sandbox/messaging, focused on providing the infrastructure for the implementation of clustered applications. This proto has reached a stage, which is according to me good enough for judgment. I will try to describe here the main features of this

Re: sandbox/messaging - your feedbacks are welcome

2004-07-20 Thread Freddi Gyara
snip As a matter of fact, this proto uses multicast (UDP) only for its heartbeat mechanism and unicast (TCP) for all the other activities. /snip I think i was a bit vague. No doubt, TCP is required for all p2p communications. However, when a server has a (sorted) list of live servers