Re: svn commit: r588500 - in /geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration

2007-10-31 Thread Prasad Kashyap
Whoa ! Somehow this thread never showed up on my radar screen. Comments inline - Cheers Prasad. On 10/29/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 27, 2007, at 11:32 AM, David Jencks wrote: The admin console needs to be lightweight and portable so it is based on Pluto. The

Re: svn commit: r588500 - in /geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration

2007-10-31 Thread Paul McMahan
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: On 10/29/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 27, 2007, at 11:32 AM, David Jencks wrote: The admin console needs to be lightweight and portable so it is based on Pluto. The Jetspeed MBE (as currently designed) would interfere

Re: svn commit: r588500 - in /geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration

2007-10-29 Thread Paul McMahan
On Oct 27, 2007, at 11:32 AM, David Jencks wrote: The admin console needs to be lightweight and portable so it is based on Pluto. The Jetspeed MBE (as currently designed) would interfere with the deployment of admin console extensions. Adding something to the Geronimo plan to activate

Re: svn commit: r588500 - in /geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration

2007-10-27 Thread Donald Woods
Paul McMahan wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 12:55 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: This jetspeed integration is coming along nicely! Very promising work. Instead of introducing a MBE that automatically configures the webapp for jetspeed based on the

Re: svn commit: r588500 - in /geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration

2007-10-27 Thread David Jencks
On Oct 27, 2007, at 6:56 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Paul McMahan wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 12:55 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: This jetspeed integration is coming along nicely! Very promising work. Instead of introducing a MBE that

Re: svn commit: r588500 - in /geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration

2007-10-26 Thread David Jencks
On Oct 26, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: This jetspeed integration is coming along nicely! Very promising work. Instead of introducing a MBE that automatically configures the webapp for jetspeed based on the presence of WEB-INF/portlet.xml can we look into allowing jetspeed to

Re: svn commit: r588500 - in /geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration

2007-10-26 Thread Paul McMahan
This jetspeed integration is coming along nicely! Very promising work. Instead of introducing a MBE that automatically configures the webapp for jetspeed based on the presence of WEB-INF/portlet.xml can we look into allowing jetspeed to handle its own deployment via placement in its hot

Re: svn commit: r588500 - in /geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration

2007-10-26 Thread Paul McMahan
On Oct 26, 2007, at 12:55 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Oct 26, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: This jetspeed integration is coming along nicely! Very promising work. Instead of introducing a MBE that automatically configures the webapp for jetspeed based on the presence of