[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-220) Default implementation of BasicVertex#sendMsgToAllEdges()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13402926#comment-13402926 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-220: I think that is very reasonable.

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-82) Remove default of using ImmutableOutputCommitter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-82?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13402929#comment-13402929 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-82: --- Or IllegalArgumentException is fine. But we should

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13402928#comment-13402928 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-221: We do have @Override public abstract

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-76) Refactor worker logic from GraphMapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13402932#comment-13402932 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-76: --- Good start! So for this (anyone else, please

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-141) multigraph support in giraph

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13402935#comment-13402935 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-141: I think addEdgeRequest would still need J edgeId.

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-220) Default implementation of BasicVertex#sendMsgToAllEdges()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alessandro Presta updated GIRAPH-220: - Attachment: GIRAPH-220.patch Default implementation of

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-141) multigraph support in giraph

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13402976#comment-13402976 ] Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-141: -- As I see it, the edge ids are only

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403092#comment-13403092 ] Jake Mannix commented on GIRAPH-221: I'm totally down with IterableI outEdges(), but

How does scaling work in Giraph?

During the 24th minute of the recent Hadoop Summit Video [1] Avery Ching talks about how Giraph is made scalable. I am interested in Hama which is also based on the BSP model and would like to know more details on how Giraph is made scalable. Basically, at the end of each super step, the BSP

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403102#comment-13403102 ] Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-221: -- I see what you're saying. That means

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alessandro Presta updated GIRAPH-221: - Description: Is there any particular reason why BasicVertex implements Iterable? It

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403166#comment-13403166 ] Jake Mannix commented on GIRAPH-221: Personally I like the syntactic sugar of the

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403183#comment-13403183 ] Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-221: -- I'm not trying to eliminate the

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403215#comment-13403215 ] Jan van der Lugt commented on GIRAPH-221: - +1 for adding an explicit

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-220) Default implementation of BasicVertex#sendMsgToAllEdges()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403232#comment-13403232 ] Jan van der Lugt commented on GIRAPH-220: - Indeed seems like a reasonable

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-81) Create annotations on provided algorithms for cli

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403270#comment-13403270 ] Maja Kabiljo commented on GIRAPH-81: I didn't try to run it from a jar, that's why it

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403294#comment-13403294 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-221: I was confused a few times and had to look in the

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-204) Writables don't promote and that's quite suboptimal

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403308#comment-13403308 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-204: I like this idea a lot. Strongly typed IO would

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403322#comment-13403322 ] Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-221: -- Ok, then it's a trade-off between

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-209) Include munge version in artifact name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403362#comment-13403362 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-209: Is there a new patch since the review? I don't

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-219) pom in giraph-formats-contrib should have groupId 'org.apache.giraph'.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403368#comment-13403368 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-219: +1. I've committed this. Thanks for the

[jira] [Created] (GIRAPH-222) giraph-formats-contrib not compiling

Jakob Homan created GIRAPH-222: -- Summary: giraph-formats-contrib not compiling Key: GIRAPH-222 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-222 Project: Giraph Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-219) pom in giraph-formats-contrib should have groupId 'org.apache.giraph'.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403370#comment-13403370 ] Hudson commented on GIRAPH-219: --- Integrated in Giraph-trunk-Commit #124 (See

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-217) Add SimpleTriangleClosingVertex to Giraph examples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403372#comment-13403372 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-217: +1. Good job. Add

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-217) Add SimpleTriangleClosingVertex to Giraph examples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403375#comment-13403375 ] Hudson commented on GIRAPH-217: --- Integrated in Giraph-trunk-Commit #125 (See

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-211) Add secure authentication to GIRAPH IPC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403379#comment-13403379 ] Maja Kabiljo commented on GIRAPH-211: - I talked about this to Avery, he suggested

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-211) Add secure authentication to GIRAPH IPC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403385#comment-13403385 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-211: Certificates/keys don't scale. It would be

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-220) Default implementation of BasicVertex#sendMsgToAllEdges()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403387#comment-13403387 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-220: +1 Default implementation of

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-216) NullWritable as VertexData, EdgeData or MessageData should be allowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403391#comment-13403391 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-216: Canceling patch, post-review.

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-216) NullWritable as VertexData, EdgeData or MessageData should be allowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403390#comment-13403390 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-216: This looks good, but I'd like a small test to

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-127) Extending the API with a master.compute() function.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403414#comment-13403414 ] Hudson commented on GIRAPH-127: --- Integrated in Giraph-trunk-Commit #127 (See

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-222) giraph-formats-contrib not compiling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403428#comment-13403428 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-222: ok, after compiling the base project I can get

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-213) NettyClient.stop() could deadlock according to netty.io docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403426#comment-13403426 ] Hudson commented on GIRAPH-213: --- Integrated in Giraph-trunk-Commit #128 (See

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-222) giraph-formats-contrib not compiling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403448#comment-13403448 ] Brian Femiano commented on GIRAPH-222: -- Added README.txt in the base contrib

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-214) GiraphJob should have configuration split out of it to be cleaner (GiraphConf)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-214: --- Attachment: GIRAPH-214-4.patch GiraphJob should have configuration split out of it to be

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-216) NullWritable as VertexData, EdgeData or MessageData should be allowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403584#comment-13403584 ] Jan van der Lugt commented on GIRAPH-216: - No problem, I guess this will do.

[jira] [Assigned] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman reassigned GIRAPH-205: -- Assignee: Eli Reisman (was: Roman Shaposhnik) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-205: --- Attachment: GIRAPH-205-fix.patch needed to add the top-level jar to the class path to get Giraph to

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403676#comment-13403676 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-205: Eli, can you open a new JIRA for this? We don't

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-127) Extending the API with a master.compute() function.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403702#comment-13403702 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-127: The build is failing tonight after all the newly

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13403703#comment-13403703 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-221: Doesn't the I in EdgeI,E represent the id of the

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-205: --- Attachment: (was: GIRAPH-223-1.patch) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-223) GIRAPH-205 needs to put new giraph.jar on classpath in its new top-level dir home.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-223: --- Attachment: GIRAPH-223-1.patch GIRAPH-205 needs to put new giraph.jar on classpath in its new

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-205: --- Attachment: GIRAPH-223-1.patch Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz