On 22 Jul 2014, at 12:35 pm, Andrew Oberstar wrote:
> Would something like minified JavaScript be in scope here?
>
Yes, absolutely. It should cover any kind of software artefact, including those
that happen to be encoded as text instead of some binary format, such as
libraries or apps made up
Would something like minified JavaScript be in scope here? If so, binary
may be too limiting
Andrew Oberstar
On Jul 21, 2014 8:54 PM, "Adam Murdoch" wrote:
>
> On 19 Jul 2014, at 2:52 am, Daz DeBoer
> wrote:
>
> G'day
>
> The new 'native runtime' support (C/C++/etc) introduced a powerful
> comp
On 19 Jul 2014, at 2:52 am, Daz DeBoer wrote:
> G'day
>
> The new 'native runtime' support (C/C++/etc) introduced a powerful component
> model for defining the software you are trying to build: libraries,
> applications, variants, buildTypes, etc. We're now rolling this concept into
> the jv
G'day
The new 'native runtime' support (C/C++/etc) introduced a powerful
component model for defining the software you are trying to build:
libraries, applications, variants, buildTypes, etc. We're now rolling this
concept into the jvm runtime, with a new set of 'component' plugins that
will give
