Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-alpha-1 (take 3)

+1 Was using it during my macro methods workshop (thanks to https://jitpack.io/ ), all went well :) On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:37 AM John Wagenleitner < john.wagenleit...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Paul King wrote: > > Dear community, > > I am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-alpha-1 (take 2)

at 5:26 PM Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com> wrote: > We have some documentation from Mario : > > https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/master/src/spec/doc/core-metaprogramming.adoc#macros > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Sergei Egorov <bsid...@gmail.com>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-alpha-1 (take 2)

Guillaume, Yes, I fixed this test already, builds are running, locally is green as well. I had two long flights from 6am, please excuse me for today :) On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:22 PM Sergei Egorov <bsid...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jochen, > > This is a good question :) > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-alpha-1 (take 2)

m. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:16 PM Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote: > > > On 29.03.2017 17:06, Sergei Egorov wrote: > > -1 > > We have 1 failing test ( "MacroTest > testNotAMacroCall" ) > > > > Was caused by my recent change when

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-alpha-1 (take 2)

-1 We have 1 failing test ( "MacroTest > testNotAMacroCall" ) Was caused by my recent change when I renamed extension module, sorry. I pushed a test fix. Assumption was incorrect, see the commit for an explanation. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:18 PM Paul King wrote: > Dear

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-alpha-1

Okay, it's a leftover in build.gradle of groovy-macro. "org.codehaus.groovy.macro.*runtime*.MacroGroovyMethods" but should be "org.codehaus.groovy.macro.*methods*.MacroGroovyMethods" Also, we don't merge "org.codehaus.groovy.transform.ASTTransformation" files when doing a jarjar-ing of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-alpha-1

+1 Would be nice to test macro stuff :) On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 at 07:18, Russel Winder wrote: > > > [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-alpha-1 > > [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok > > [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-alpha-1

Re: So I want to be able to pretty-print ASTNode and children...

Hey Andrew, How about AstNodeToScriptVisitor? Pretty enough? :) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35960804/convert-ast-nodes-string-to-groovy-code/35991091#35991091 On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:40 PM Jochen Theodorou wrote: > On 16.03.2017 17:46, Andrew Bayer wrote: > [...]

Re: [VOTE] Apache Groovy Roadmap

YES from me. Would be great if we can deliver #1 as a macro method, not it form of "MacroGroovy" (and hopefully forget this awkward name collision :D ) Just want to remind that there is a PR waiting for a review where I rewrote it and implemented basic macro methods support:

Re: 答复: About the "implies" operator(GROOVY-2576)

-1 from me. First of all, it's hard to understand what it does and to read it later. Also, => is Lambda notation in JS/C# and people from these languages will be very confused about it. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:06 PM Remi Forax wrote: > The other problem i see is that the

Re: MavenGrapeEngine?

FYI https://github.com/igor-suhorukov/mvn-classloader On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:43 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hmm, ibiblio (localm2 in grapesConfig.xml) has setChangingPattern( > ".*-SNAPSHOT"); so should have worked OOTBbut > >

Re: SimpleHTTPServer for Groovy 3( Maybe Groovy 2.5.0? )

Hi Daniel, To be honest, I don't like it, -1 from me. Why? Because we already put more and more stuff into the groovy itself, but, i.e. in a case of python, SimpleHTTPServer it's just a module after all. I would rather see something like: groovy -m com.sparkjava:spark-groovy -c "serve(port:

Re: [PROPOSAL]new operator ?=

+1 for ||= Very convenient operator, doesn't break readability (more or less) On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:25 PM Guillaume Laforge wrote: > It's a feature that's often be requested. > I think Ruby's got an equivalent with ||=, and it's often the reference > people give when

Re: Negative relational operators for Groovy 3

How about is and !is ? Would be nice to have them :) On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:53 PM Remi Forax wrote: > > > - Mail original - > > De: "Graeme Rocher" > > À: dev@groovy.apache.org > > Cc: d...@groovy.incubator.apache.org > > Envoyé: Vendredi

Re: Groovy macro documentation

Hey Mario, Wow! This is great! Didn't know you're working on it. I'll be happy to review :) Cheers, Sergei On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM Mario Garcia wrote: > Hi all: > > I sent a WIP with some groovy-macro documentation. The main problem with > the PR is that there're

Re: [CONTRIBUTION]groovy-parser

Hi all, just curious - will it be possible to do "any statement is an expression" with the new grammar? That would be really awesome, especially for macro methods BR, Sergei On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:31 AM daniel_sun wrote: > Hi Jochen, > > The groovy grammar

Re: Macro methods proposal

but in Groovy > would apply the macro transformations. > > > > Jason > > > > *From:* Sergei Egorov [mailto:bsid...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, September 23, 2016 5:58 AM > *To:* dev@groovy.apache.org; us...@groovy.apache.org > *Subject:* Macro methods proposal &

Macro methods proposal

Hey, everyone. It's been awhile since last time I participated in Groovy. I was mostly in read-only mode for the last two years. With this move, I hope to change it. I created a proposal for macro methods (no ETA, initially aimed to 3.0) because I think they are great for the future of Groovy

Re: [groovy-macro] static method call expressions

Hey Mario, Good catch! Maybe we should add it to documentation (when there will be some :D ) BR, Sergei On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:21 PM Mario Garcia wrote: > I figured out why: > > By default macros are using CompilePhase.CONVERSION and at this point the > compiler

Re: GROOVY-5727, removal of servlet-api from the zip distribution

+1 Currently forces some really nasty workarounds because of servlet-api conflicts when Groovy CLI is being used. As well as jsp-api On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:19 PM daniel_sun wrote: > +1 > > > > -- > View this message in context: >