Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Grails to top level

+1 > On 15 Sep 2025, at 13:00, Andres Almiray wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Sent from my primitive tricorder > >> On 15 Sep 2025, at 1:42, Remko Popma wrote: >> >>  >> +1 >> >>> On Sep 15, 2025, at 15:19, Søren Berg Glasius wrote: >>> >>>  >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> I am excited! >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geb 8.0.0

+1 > On 10 Sep 2025, at 08:00, Guillaume Laforge wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 12:17 AM Paul King > wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> I checked: >> * sha256 and sha512 checksums >> * valid signature >> * NOTICE and LICENSE files appear correct

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 5.0.0-rc-1

+1 > On 3 Aug 2025, at 15:17, Remko Popma wrote: > > +1 > >> On Aug 3, 2025, at 19:19, Andres Almiray wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> 🎉🎉🎉 >> >> Sent from my primitive tricorder >> >>> On 3 Aug 2025, at 12:54, Paul King wrote: >>> >>>  >>> Dear development community, >>> >>> I am happy

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Grails (incubating) Plugin - Quartz 4.0.0-M3

+1 > On 2 Aug 2025, at 04:46, Remko Popma wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 9:38 PM Paul King > wrote: >> +1 binding (paulk) >> >> I checked: >> >> * incubating in name >> * no unexpected binaries in distribution >> * LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER files exist

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Grails (incubating) Plugin - Spring Security 7.0.0-M5

+1 > On 2 Aug 2025, at 04:46, Remko Popma wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 9:24 PM Paul King > wrote: >> +1 binding (paulk) >> >> I checked: >> >> * incubating in name >> * no unexpected binaries in distribution >> * LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER files exist

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Grails (incubating) Plugin - Redis 5.0.0-M5

+1 > On 2 Aug 2025, at 04:47, Remko Popma wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 9:17 PM Paul King > wrote: >> +1 binding (paulk) >> >> I checked: >> >> * incubating in name >> * no unexpected binaries in distribution >> * LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER files exist

Re: Potential to include java.time.* as a default import for Groovy 5

+1 from me. Although I have fallen into Groovy's @Singleton vs Jakarta @Singleon pitfall, given that `java.time` classes are strongly recommended, I think this change is positive. > On 31 May 2025, at 09:36, Paul King wrote: > > Hi folks, > > We have a feature request, and potential PR, to

Re: Revamp of introductory paragraph on website

+1 > On 25 Feb 2025, at 09:32, Søren Berg Glasius wrote: > > +1 > > Den tirs. 25. feb. 2025 kl. 04.22 skrev Paul King >: >> Hi folks, >> >> Currently the intro description on groovy-lang.org >> says: >> >> A multi-faceted language for th

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Redirect gebish.org to groovy.apache.org/geb

+1 > On 24 Feb 2025, at 02:38, Paul King wrote: > > Hi folks, > > It was discussed informally that as part of Geb coming on board as a > Groovy subproject, we should point the existing domain to its new > home. I believe we are now ready to do that. This LAZY vote requires > no response but if

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Groovy 4.0.25 Released

Micronaut Framework 4.8.0, planned for the next weeks, will ship Apache Groovy 4.0.25. Thanks, Sergio del Amo > On 25 Jan 2025, at 02:47, Paul King wrote: > > Dear community, > > The Apache Groovy team is pleased to announce version 4.0.25 of Apache Groovy. > Apache Groovy

Re: [VOTE] Grails Project proposes to join the ASF

+1 > On 22 Jan 2025, at 08:18, Guillaume Laforge wrote: > > +1 > > Le mar. 21 janv. 2025, 21:45, Paul King a écrit : > Hi folks, > > The Grails project is keen to join the ASF. The suggested path into > the ASF is for Groovy to act as the incubating project. This means > that we'll have a lit

Re: Groovy Champions proposal feedback

+1 I would leave the money out. But a trophy or something physical would be nice. I would collect votes via a web form. To keep the winner unknown. Allows for surprise announcement. Sergio > On 10 May 2019, at 18:27, Andres Almiray wrote: > > I concur with most points except for the $ aspe

Re: Binary compatibility fixed + Kotlin DSL

but using the Kotlin DSL and assisted by the IDE support is going to do a worst job than someone with a lot of Groovy knowledge using the Groovy Gradle DSL. Sergio del Amo > On 20 Mar 2019, at 21:50, Cédric Champeau wrote: > > And do you honestly think that trying to hide that by not

Re: Binary compatibility fixed + Kotlin DSL

> I do in fact see this as at least a minor threat. If Groovy itself can't > even manage to use the Gradle Groovy DSL, what hope remains for the survival > of the Groovy DSL? Agree. I see a threat at least to Gradle Groovy DSL survival and probably to Groovy in general. One may reason: If th

Re: What the... static compile by default

Groovy Community because without any doubt you make it better. Sergio del Amo On 7 May 2018 at 16:59, Daniel.Sun wrote: > Hi Cédric, > > Feel free to remove any code. > To be honest, I am really tired. > Bye Groovy community. > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun