gt; *From:* MG
> *Sent:* Friday, August 7, 2020 3:37 PM
> *To:* dev@groovy.apache.org; Milles, Eric (TR Technology)
>
> *Subject:* Re: switch destructuring
>
>
>
> Hi eric,
>
> just to make my post clear: I do not desperately need pattern
> matching, but I know f
ould support Java syntax as
> best as possible.
>
>
>
> *From:* MG
> *Sent:* Friday, August 7, 2020 3:37 PM
> *To:* dev@groovy.apache.org; Milles, Eric (TR Technology) <
> eric.mil...@thomsonreuters.com>
> *Subject:* Re: switch destructuring
>
>
>
> Hi er
gap between
Java and Groovy. And I think Groovy should support Java syntax as best as
possible.
From: MG
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 3:37 PM
To: dev@groovy.apache.org; Milles, Eric (TR Technology)
Subject: Re: switch destructuring
Hi eric,
just to make my post clear: I do not desperately n
Hi eric,
just to make my post clear: I do not desperately need pattern matching,
but I know from experience that (full blown) pattern matching is a very
powerful feature (I implemented automatic series expansion of quantum
field theory Green functions through functional derivatives using
There is a pattern match syntax that is implemented using Groovy macros so that
you can use the match "keyword".
https://github.com/bsideup/groovy-pattern-match/blob/feature/dsl-like-matching/src/test/groovy/ru/trylogic/groovy/pattern/PatternMatchingMacroMethodsTest.groovy
The current version
