In 2.6 we can't assume that the java time stuff will be there.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Keegan Witt wrote:
> We should make the change to remove that dependency in both 2.6 and 3.0,
> right?
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:49 PM Keegan Witt wrote:
>
>> Ah. Thank you. That's what I was
You could just do this
"${new java.text.SimpleDateFormat('yyy-MM-dd').format(new Date())}"
Instead of
"${new Date().format('-MM-dd')}"
That should work everywhere.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 2:35 AM Paul King wrote:
> In 2.6 we can't assume that the java time stuff will be there.
>
> On Wed,
