Hey Andrew,
How about AstNodeToScriptVisitor? Pretty enough? :)
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35960804/convert-ast-nodes-string-to-groovy-code/35991091#35991091
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:40 PM Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> On 16.03.2017 17:46, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> [...]
+1
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Paul King wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I am happy to (re)start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.4.10 release!
> This release has the problematic stricter method checking
> (GROOVY-6792) disabled by default but it can be enabled with a system
On 16.03.2017 22:54, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 14.03.2017 12:06, Russel Winder wrote:
[...]
It might be worth thinking about whether GPars has a real future since
so few people seem to be interested in actively working on it. With
Quasar (Parallel Universe thing not Quasar Framework) there is
On 14.03.2017 12:06, Russel Winder wrote:
[...]
I also note that JDK9 may have some features that require a rethink of
some GPars implementation detail for a JDK and later specific GPars.
cf. http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/html/j9mm.html
yes, VarHandles are something to take a look at for sure.
if that means not waiting another year for parrot: +1
On 15.03.2017 04:15, Paul King wrote:
Hi folks,
Earlier in the year, Cédric did a great job of outlining a possible
roadmap for Groovy. I think there was general consensus on most of it
but we never quite managed complete consensus.
We had
On 16.03.2017 17:46, Andrew Bayer wrote:
[...]
I don't think there's anything out there that does this currently, so
I'm gonna write up a PR to add this. Now I need to figure out what the
right implementation would be. Do I go with adding useful .toString()
methods to the various ASTNode
Yeah, I know, you can visualize the AST nicely in the Groovy console, but
I'm dealing with it in the context of Jenkins Pipelines' Groovy CPS
transformation/compilation, so...being able to pretty print would be really
nice for mapping our weirdness out. =)
I don't think there's anything out there
+1
On 16 Mar 2017 15:29, "Guillaume Laforge" wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Paul King wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Earlier in the year, Cédric did a great job of outlining a possible
>> roadmap for Groovy. I think there was general
Fixed
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Paul King wrote:
> Hi Cédric, the commit below breaks the JDK 6 build:
> java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
> me/champeau/gradle/buildscans/RecipesPlugin : Unsupported major.minor
> version 51.0
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at
Just a slight deviation to below. The version number on master has
temporarily been set to 2.9.98-SNAPSHOT pending Spock support of
Groovy 3+ version numbers.
Cheers, Paul.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Paul King wrote:
> I have created the 2_5_X branch. I have made
> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 2.4.10
> [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 2.4.10 because...
I am not going to be able to check anything in the timebox so
technically must abstain. But otherwise I'd be +1.
--
Russel.
11 matches
Mail list logo