Re: Groovy and code coverage

+1 on the idea in general, obviously there's a few more details to work out yet. I have some similar concerns to Cédric but I guess we can address those as we go. Cheers, Paul. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Andres Almiray wrote: > BTW, I met with a couple of SonarSource

Re: Groovy and code coverage

BTW, I met with a couple of SonarSource engineers last week in Geneva during a presentation at Geneva JUG. The topic of code coverage with JaCoCo and Groovy came up. They told me a feature such as the one discussed in this thread would help them greatly in getting better code coverage numbers.