Re: [VOTE] Move the Groovy repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org to gitbox.apache.org

+1 On Sat, Dec 8, 2018, 1:54 PM Paul King As per DanielG's attached email, we need to move our remaining git-wip > repos: > Apache Groovy > Repository name:Description:Last changed:Links: > groovy.git Apache > Groovy < 2 days ago Summary

Re: [VOTE] Move the Groovy repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org to gitbox.apache.org

+1 Sent from my primitive tricorder > On Dec 9, 2018, at 02:04, Keegan Witt wrote: > > +1 > > Also, folks should just be able to do "git remote add" instead of re-cloning. > Shouldn't be a big deal. > >> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 4:54 PM Paul King wrote: >> As per DanielG's attached email,

Re: [VOTE] Move the Groovy repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org to gitbox.apache.org

+1 Also, folks should just be able to do "git remote add" instead of re-cloning. Shouldn't be a big deal. On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 4:54 PM Paul King wrote: > As per DanielG's attached email, we need to move our remaining git-wip > repos: > Apache Groovy > Repository name:Description:Last

Re: [VOTE] Move the Groovy repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org to gitbox.apache.org

+1 On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 6:54 AM Paul King wrote: > As per DanielG's attached email, we need to move our remaining git-wip > repos: > Apache Groovy > Repository name:Description:Last changed:Links: > groovy.git Apache > Groovy < 2 days

[VOTE] Move the Groovy repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org to gitbox.apache.org

As per DanielG's attached email, we need to move our remaining git-wip repos: Apache Groovy Repository name:Description:Last changed:Links: groovy.git Apache Groovy < 2 days ago Summary

Re: DGM wildcards

We are always keen for quality contributions. The underlying generics issue(s) might be hard to get into (though contributions most welcome) but improving the DGM methods can be treated somewhat separately. On a case-by-case basis we can determine whether any change would break things until the

Re: DGM wildcards

Hi Marcin, As for the generics in Groovy, the issue I mostly wish to fix is GROOVY-8409 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8409 ). Apart from the discussion in the JIRA issue, here is some more thoughts on the issue:

Re: DGM wildcards

If there is willingness to accept contributions in that area then I'd be happy to give it a shot. I would be much happier myself if the tooling, especially IntelliJ, had a better chance of understanding the types, especially when closures are used as arguments, for DGM methods. Marcin On Sat,