Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Apache Groovy Roadmap - take 2

+1 On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > if that means not waiting another year for parrot: +1 > > > On 15.03.2017 04:15, Paul King wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> Earlier in the year, Cédric did a great job of outlining a possible >> roadmap for Groovy. I

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Apache Groovy Roadmap - take 2

if that means not waiting another year for parrot: +1 On 15.03.2017 04:15, Paul King wrote: Hi folks, Earlier in the year, Cédric did a great job of outlining a possible roadmap for Groovy. I think there was general consensus on most of it but we never quite managed complete consensus. We had

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Apache Groovy Roadmap - take 2

+1 On 16 Mar 2017 15:29, "Guillaume Laforge" wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Paul King wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> Earlier in the year, Cédric did a great job of outlining a possible >> roadmap for Groovy. I think there was general

[VOTE][LAZY] Apache Groovy Roadmap - take 2

Hi folks, Earlier in the year, Cédric did a great job of outlining a possible roadmap for Groovy. I think there was general consensus on most of it but we never quite managed complete consensus. We had a fairly clear consensus on getting out 2.5 with macro support - that is underway now. There