Re: Optional modules and Groovy 4

2020-05-28 Thread Paul King
Sent:* Tuesday, May 26, 2020 6:35 AM > *To:* Groovy_Developers > *Subject:* Re: Optional modules and Groovy 4 > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 9:17 PM Remko Popma wrote: > > Isn't groovy-dateutil in use because of the convenience of utility > metho

RE: Optional modules and Groovy 4

2020-05-28 Thread Milles, Eric (TR Tech, Content & Ops)
Maybe instead of removing items from the "all" pom, a separate artifact gets created that includes commonly-used components. Or has the time come to stop producing the "all" artifact? From: Paul King Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 6:35 AM To: Groovy_Developers Subject:

Re: Optional modules and Groovy 4

2020-05-26 Thread Paul King
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 9:17 PM Remko Popma wrote: > Isn't groovy-dateutil in use because of the convenience of utility > methods for converting from String to Date and back? > Yes, converting String <-> java.util.Date is still widely used even though we include String <-> JSR-310 Date/Time

Re: Optional modules and Groovy 4

2020-05-26 Thread Remko Popma
Isn't groovy-dateutil in use because of the convenience of utility methods for converting from String to Date and back? Apart from that, when we are talking about groovy-all, we are talking about a maven thing, not a jar, right? On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:56 PM Guillaume Laforge wrote: >

Re: Optional modules and Groovy 4

2020-05-26 Thread Guillaume Laforge
Sounds like a good idea to review the (optional) modules for 4.0. On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:39 AM Daniel.Sun wrote: > +1 > > Cheers, > Daniel Sun > > > > - > Apache Groovy committer & PMC member > Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me > Twitter: @daniel_sun > > -- > Sent from:

Re: Optional modules and Groovy 4

2020-05-25 Thread Daniel.Sun
+1 Cheers, Daniel Sun - Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: Optional modules and Groovy 4

2020-05-25 Thread Paul King
ot wanting YAML but they > can exclude > > I haven't checked download numbers (and perhaps moot since it isn't > optional) but I was leaning towards adding groovy-testng to optional > modules for Groovy 4. There seems less interest in that technology since > JUnit 5. > > In m

Optional modules and Groovy 4

2020-05-25 Thread Paul King
haven't checked download numbers (and perhaps moot since it isn't optional) but I was leaning towards adding groovy-testng to optional modules for Groovy 4. There seems less interest in that technology since JUnit 5. In my view, groovy-servlet, groovy-jmx and groovy-docgenerator would be other candidates