Re: Hadoop Windows Build

2024-04-27 Thread Ayush Saxena
Found this on dev@hadoop -> Moving to common-dev (the ML we use) I think there was some initiative to enable Windows Pre-Commit for every PR and that seems to have gone wild, either the number of PRs raised are way more than the capacity the nodes can handle or something got misconfigured in the j

2022 ASF Community Survey

2022-08-24 Thread Ayush Saxena
Apache community, your opinion matters: we want to hear your voice. If you have any questions about the survey or otherwise, please reach out to us! Kindly, Ayush Saxena On Behalf of: Katia Rojas V.P. of Diversity and Inclusion The Apache Software Foundation

Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling all platform builds in CI for all Hadoop PRs

2022-05-18 Thread Ayush Saxena
Have raised HADOOP-18241 There is a WIP PR linked to it as well https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18241 On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 01:28, Ayush Saxena wrote: > +1 for moving to Java 11 for trunk. > If nobody objects by EOW will create a jira for that > > -Ayush > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling all platform builds in CI for all Hadoop PRs

2022-05-10 Thread Ayush Saxena
like >> test.build.data, indirectly through utility classes like GenericTestUtils, >> or modifying shared resources within target/test-classes. I've been working >> towards cleaning up flaky tests, and I plan on submitting some patches today. >> From: Steve Loughran >&

Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling all platform builds in CI for all Hadoop PRs

2022-05-07 Thread Ayush Saxena
I had done earlier). > > So, I'll settle down to integrating the full suite of platform > builds into the nightly builds. Could anyone please point > me to the Jenkins job for this? > > [1] = https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3166 > > Thanks, > --Gautham >

Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling all platform builds in CI for all Hadoop PRs

2022-05-06 Thread Ayush Saxena
>From functional point of view it does makes sense to validate all the platforms as part of the builds, but the Pre commits builds taking time is now no longer a small things, In past one year or may be two, we have already increased it more than twice as compared to what it was before, If someone

Re: [DISCUSS] Race condition in ProtobufRpcEngine2

2022-02-28 Thread Ayush Saxena
Hey Andras, I had a quick look at HADOOP-18143, the methods in question in ProtobufRpcEngine2 are identical to the ones in ProtobufRpcEngine. So, I am not very sure how the race condition doesn't happen in ProtobufRpcEngine. I have to debug and spend some more time, considering that I have revert

Re: [DISCUSS] Checkin Hadoop code formatter

2021-09-11 Thread Ayush Saxena
Thanx Viraj for initiating, Makes sense to me to include a formmater inline with our checkstyle rules in the code, would make life simpler for all devs. -Ayush > On 12-Sep-2021, at 12:28 AM, Viraj Jasani wrote: > > + common-...@hadoop.apache.org > > -- Forwarded message - > F

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.1 RC3

2021-06-12 Thread Ayush Saxena
+1, Built from Source. Successful Native Build on Ubuntu 20.04 Verified Checksums Ran basic hdfs shell commands. Ran simple MR jobs. Browsed NN,DN,RM and NM UI. Thanx Wei-Chiu for driving the release. -Ayush > On 12-Jun-2021, at 1:45 AM, epa...@apache.org wrote: > > +1 (binding) > Eric > >

Re: [DISCUSS] check style changes

2021-05-13 Thread Ayush Saxena
If you tend to change the line limit, It should have a proper DISCUSS and VOTE thread. If I remember it correct for ozone it was discussed to increase the limit to 100 from 80 and that got vetoed. So, we too should get an agreement first. Well I have gone through the ozone discussion and I also

Re: [VOTE] Moving Ozone to a separated Apache project

2020-09-25 Thread Ayush Saxena
+1 -Ayush > On 25-Sep-2020, at 11:30 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > Hi all, > > Thank you for all the feedback and requests, > > As we discussed in the previous thread(s) [1], Ozone is proposed to be a > separated Apache Top Level Project (TLP) > > The proposal with all the details, motivatio