Chris Gray wrote:
> On Thursday 23 November 2006 07:02, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> No, it is time for lunch :)
>
> Eh? I only just had breakfast ...
and I should probably go to bed :-)
--
Stefano.
Egor Pasko wrote:
> On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Robin Garner wrote:
>> I'm normalising to the best commercial JVM performance (across Sun
>> 1.5, JRockit and IBM J9) on the same box. It's a Pentium D 2.8GHz, in
>> 32-bit mode.
>
> Penium D is Prescott, it is reasonable to try on Conroe, Ji
Egor Pasko wrote:
> On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>> Find new reports on melody:
>>
>> 1) findbugs reports 2895 potential bugs of 207 of which serious
>>
>> 2) cpd now reports against both classlib/java and drlvm/c (I will do
>> classlib/c and drlvm/java later)
>
>
Hi Oleg
I did not see tests in the JIRA. Are they in a different one?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/17, Oleg Khaschansky (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2215?page=all ]
Oleg Khaschansky updated HARMONY-2215:
--
P
Congratulations! I'm very proud of you! )))
And good luck!!!
Cheers,
Sveta
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 8:50 AM
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: [announce] New Apache Harmony Committer : Nadezhda Morozova
Plea
On Thursday 23 November 2006 07:02, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> No, it is time for lunch :)
Eh? I only just had breakfast ...
On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Robin Garner wrote:
> I'm normalising to the best commercial JVM performance (across Sun
> 1.5, JRockit and IBM J9) on the same box. It's a Pentium D 2.8GHz, in
> 32-bit mode.
Penium D is Prescott, it is reasonable to try on Conroe, Jitrino is
likely to behave b
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
> On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Right - my point is that excluding our thread tests is a big red flag.
>> I know that you and others have been working very hard to get this
fixed.
Did I understand correctly that it's a temporary solution to
differentiate between
"api" and "impl" tests?
package javax.swing.text;
<...>
public class PlainViewI18N_LineViewTest extends SwingTestCase {
<...>
public void testGetPreferredSpan01() throws Exception {
if (!isHarmony()) {
2006/11/23, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I like it!
When I ran CPD on C code base it discovered more than cut&paste
problems. Usually the code which contained big cut&pasted fragments
had design problems as well. I wonder if it is true for Harmony.
1. I have no idea if and how java.* pac
2006/11/23, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>
> Gregory Shimansky wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Today I've found a bug (HARMONY-2271) which lead down to APR
>> implementation of getenv function on windows. I've looked at the APR
>> page and found that there is a new rel
23 Nov 2006 12:20:05 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Since many guys reported different regressions, I believe it is good
> time to delay a bit DRLVM features and optimizations and accept only
> regression bug fixes. What do you th
I see the failure too. Wiil fix it shortly.
BTW have anyone seen notificatrions about build failure?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/23, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Paulex,
Vladimir reports the test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cannot find PatternTest.golden.ser. Why this could be?
Should the file be c
Good! I like it:)
Aha!
There is drlvm-cpd page also. The only relevant problem is a lot of
copy-pasted code in generics parser, this is a known issue
HARMONY-2052.
2006/11/23, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I like it!
When I ran CPD on C code base it discovered more than cut&paste
problems. Usually the cod
Congratulations, Nadya!
On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
> Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
> committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
>
> Nadya has shown sustained dedication to the project, especially in the
> area of documentation and the w
On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Find new reports on melody:
>
> 1) findbugs reports 2895 potential bugs of 207 of which serious
>
> 2) cpd now reports against both classlib/java and drlvm/c (I will do
> classlib/c and drlvm/java later)
I see no drlvm/c, only drlvm
On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Since many guys reported different regressions, I believe it is good
> time to delay a bit DRLVM features and optimizations and accept only
> regression bug fixes. What do you think?
I suggest to revert HARMONY-2223 until Alex has a better
Congratulations!
SY, Alexey
2006/11/23, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
Nadya has shown sustained dedication to the project, especially in the
area of documentation and the website, an ab
Congratulations, Nadya!
Thanks,
Pavel
On 11/23/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congrats!
On 11/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
> committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
>
> Nadya has shown sustain
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I have a small problem with this - seems like we're rushing patches in
without much review or discussion. For a while there we were able to
test on a few platforms first, lazily, because there was more than 1
hour between patch submission and commit.
Actually, the
While output may depends on locale here is locale information for my linux
box:
vivanov> locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="en_US
Congrats!
On 11/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
Nadya has shown sustained dedication to the project, especially in the
area of documentation and the website, an ability to wo
congratulations!
On 11/23/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
congratulations!
2006/11/23, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
> committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
>
> Nadya has shown sustained dedication to the pr
Congratulations ;-)
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
Nadya has shown sustained dedication to the project, especially in the
area of documentation and the website, an ability to work well with
others, a
congratulations!
On 11/23/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
congratulations!
2006/11/23, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
> committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
>
> Nadya has shown sustained dedication to the pro
Well done, congratulations!
2006/11/23, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
congratulations!
2006/11/23, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
> committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
>
> Nadya has shown sustained dedication to the
congratulations!
2006/11/23, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
Nadya has shown sustained dedication to the project, especially in the
area of documentation and the website, an ability to wor
Let ne answer in one message:
Salikh,
indeed I did not test on real x86_64 OS, only tried on 32-bit OSes on
x86 and x86_64 hardware. Will try to resolve this ASAP, sorry for
inconvenience!
Geir,
I would not call it rush - the JIRA was there for a few days actually,
with all the patches. Maybe I'm
No, it is time for lunch :)
On 11/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
seems like the big problem is here :
[exec] [junit] 1: ?? (??:-1)
you are passing ?? and -1 to the ?? function. I think you need to pass
?? and 0.
Time to go to bed, I think...
geir
Vladi
Nice!
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Find new reports on melody:
1) findbugs reports 2895 potential bugs of 207 of which serious
2) cpd now reports against both classlib/java and drlvm/c (I will do
classlib/c and drlvm/java later)
3) removed locales and messages from cpd on classlib/java
4) I'
Congrats!
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
Nadya has shown sustained dedication to the project, especially in the
area of documentation and the website, an ability to work well with
others, and share t
seems like the big problem is here :
[exec] [junit] 1: ?? (??:-1)
you are passing ?? and -1 to the ?? function. I think you need to pass
?? and 0.
Time to go to bed, I think...
geir
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Could somebody look at the
TEST-javax.swing.text.DefaultStyledDocument
Please join the Apache Harmony PMC in welcoming the project's newest
committer, Nadezhda Morozova.
Nadya has shown sustained dedication to the project, especially in the
area of documentation and the website, an ability to work well with
others, and share the common vision we have for Harmony.
Could somebody look at the
TEST-javax.swing.text.DefaultStyledDocumentRTest.xml test crash (log below)?
Seems, it is intermittent failure.
My configuration is SUSE 9 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] CPU, 1Gb RAM:
vivanov> uname -a
Linux nstdrlxl5 2.6.5-7.191-bigsmp #1 SMP Tue Jun 28 14:58:56 UTC 2005 i686
i68
Hi, all
After applying JIRA 2162, JIRA 2181 and JIRA 2192 Harmony has the same
passing rate on Hibernate tests as RI of 98.62%. Since the hibernate project
are still in progress, I think we can ignore those failed both on RI and
Harmony.
The revision of Harmony Classlib is at 478424 and tha
harmony 2275 was created to fix this issue.
Thanks, Vladimir
On 11/23/06, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulex,
Vladimir reports the test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cannot find PatternTest.golden.ser. Why this could be?
Should the file be copied to bin/test? Or should we add it's current
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Find new reports on melody:
>
> 1) findbugs reports 2895 potential bugs of 207 of which serious
>
> 2) cpd now reports against both classlib/java and drlvm/c (I will do
> classlib/c and drlvm/java later)
>
> 3) removed locales and messages from cpd on classlib/java
Find new reports on melody:
1) findbugs reports 2895 potential bugs of 207 of which serious
2) cpd now reports against both classlib/java and drlvm/c (I will do
classlib/c and drlvm/java later)
3) removed locales and messages from cpd on classlib/java
4) I've cleaned up the code for the cpd
I generated the golden file by RI and got the testcase[1] below failed
on Harmony.
In general, we should implement a class whose name/package is
completely same as RI for serialization compatiblity, but the
customized Map is not a public class.(i.e. I'm not able get the class
name from spec.) Is
Today I have only 2 failures (again: test name + stack trace for classlib
tests on DRLVM for debug build on WinXP):
Test: testSerialization Class:
org.apache.harmony.tests.java.util.regex.PatternTest
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Failed to load serialization resource
file:
serializati
A rebuild version after a "clean" works fine.
Thanks for the help.
thanks and regards,
chunrong
On 11/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[I had to do a forward - because Alexei had is signature above the
reponse my mailer Thunderbird thinks it's all one big sig...]
Why woul
Paulex,
Vladimir reports the test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cannot find PatternTest.golden.ser. Why this could be?
Should the file be copied to bin/test? Or should we add it's current
locaton to the classpath?
--
Thank you,
Alexei
On 11/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: pyan
On 23/11/06, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why would you need to do anything to the SVN meta files (.svn)? DRLVM
doesn't run on MacOS either, so how do you verify your code builds and
test run within the Harmony codebase?
Because I don't want to build the java/util/* when I'm working
Evgueni,
Thanks for your interest! The issues can be found at the web site in a
readable form:
http://harmonytest.org/testapp.do?method=showrun&id=179&result=2
http://harmonytest.org/testapp.do?method=showrun&id=179&result=3
http://harmonytest.org/testapp.do?method=showrun&id=180&result=2
We ha
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Hello
Today I've found a bug (HARMONY-2271) which lead down to APR
implementation of getenv function on windows. I've looked at the APR
page and found that there is a new release 1.2.7. In drlvm we still
use 1.2.6.
While the bug which I'
I'm normalising to the best commercial JVM performance (across Sun 1.5,
JRockit and IBM J9) on the same box. It's a Pentium D 2.8GHz, in 32-bit
mode.
Also this is OOTB, in a modest sized heap.
cheers
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I reviewed - looks like Robin is seeing DRLVM get an aggregate
pe
I reviewed - looks like Robin is seeing DRLVM get an aggregate
performance of about 35% of whatever he's measuring against.
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
Lets do the simplest thing fist
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
Lets do the simplest thing fist. :)
We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads.
I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are constantly
around 25% speed against
On 11/22/06, Alex Blewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/11/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Blewitt wrote:
> > I'd also like to get the pack200 code moved out of the archive module
> > and into its own module, and after applying this patch sounds like a
> > good time to do thi
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>> Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
>>
>>> Lets do the simplest thing fist. :)
>>> We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads.
>>
>> I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are constantly
>> around 25% speed against the
[I had to do a forward - because Alexei had is signature above the
reponse my mailer Thunderbird thinks it's all one big sig...]
Why would you need a fresh tree? Shouldn't a "clean" on both classlib
and drlvm take care of it?
geir
Original Message
From: Alexei Fedotov <[
On Thursday 23 November 2006 03:08 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Yep - thanks for the reminder! I've assigned it back :)
There is a sub-task for HARMONY-2179, HARMONY-2180. It is the relatively
recent progress in it which actually made me to try to help with this work.
If you want the whole tree
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
Lets do the simplest thing fist. :)
We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads.
I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are constantly
around 25% speed against the leading JVM (which is always sun5 or sun6),
bea5
With "no regressions" :)
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
+1 for APR minor version increase
On 11/23/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
Today I've found a bug (HARMONY-2271) which lead down to APR
implementation of getenv function on windows. I've looked at the APR
page and found tha
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Hello
Today I've found a bug (HARMONY-2271) which lead down to APR
implementation of getenv function on windows. I've looked at the APR
page and found that there is a new release 1.2.7. In drlvm we still use
1.2.6.
While the bug which I've found was apparently fix
Yep - thanks for the reminder! I've assigned it back :)
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Hello Geir
I really didn't notice that it was assigned to you, I noticed it only in
JIRA notification. If you were working on it please assign it back to
yourself. I am just trying to help, you know.
On 22/11/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Blewitt wrote:
> I'd also like to get the pack200 code moved out of the archive module
> and into its own module, and after applying this patch sounds like a
> good time to do this. If someone can help me with the creation of a
> new module
Hello Geir
I really didn't notice that it was assigned to you, I noticed it only in
JIRA notification. If you were working on it please assign it back to
yourself. I am just trying to help, you know.
--
Gregory
Robin Garner wrote:
>> Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
>>
>>> Lets do the simplest thing fist. :)
>>> We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads.
>> I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are constantly
>> around 25% speed against the leading JVM (which is always sun5 or sun6)
Gregory, this is a good question. Let me tell this long story.
Jimmy tried to run the test using J9 VM and the test passed. I beleive
Alexey Petrenko considered that fact as a justification to move the
bug to [drlvm] category. Alexey, is my understanding correct?
Why the test passed on J9? Denis
I like it!
When I ran CPD on C code base it discovered more than cut&paste
problems. Usually the code which contained big cut&pasted fragments
had design problems as well. I wonder if it is true for Harmony.
1. I have no idea if and how java.* packages should be fixed. We don't
have much freedom
> Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
>
>> Lets do the simplest thing fist. :)
>> We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads.
>
> I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are constantly
> around 25% speed against the leading JVM (which is always sun5 or sun6),
> bea5 is around 80% a
+1 for APR minor version increase
On 11/23/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
Today I've found a bug (HARMONY-2271) which lead down to APR
implementation of getenv function on windows. I've looked at the APR
page and found that there is a new release 1.2.7. In drlvm we still
Since many guys reported different regressions, I believe it is good
time to delay a bit DRLVM features and optimizations and accept only
regression bug fixes. What do you think?
The first thing to do is to understand what's broken. To my
understanding the most obvious thing which is broken is Vl
Hello
Today I've found a bug (HARMONY-2271) which lead down to APR
implementation of getenv function on windows. I've looked at the APR
page and found that there is a new release 1.2.7. In drlvm we still use
1.2.6.
While the bug which I've found was apparently fixed after 1.2.7 was
released
Chunrong,
Have you tried building em64t or IPF from the same source tree? Does
rebuilding from the freshly checkouted tree produce the same error?
--
Thank you,
Alexei
If you build em64t and ia32 from the same source tree, the mixture is
quite probable. Check if the file is rebuilt
On 11/21/06,
Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
> Lets do the simplest thing fist. :)
> We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads.
I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are constantly
around 25% speed against the leading JVM (which is always sun5 or sun6),
bea5 is around 80% and ibm5 is a
Hello
Looks like Ivan has found the problem. He's created HARMONY-2268. I am
currently testing it and if it helps, I'll apply it. The finalizer fix
was apparently reverted by HARMONY-1573.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 03:01 Geir Magnusso
Paulex Yang wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>> I've managed to run CPD[1] against harmony classlib.
>>
>> CPD (or cut/paste detector) is a tool that is capable of showing where
>> code was cut/pasted from different parts of the source tree.
>>
>> I managed to filter out all the tests (because the
I have a small problem with this - seems like we're rushing patches in
without much review or discussion. For a while there we were able to
test on a few platforms first, lazily, because there was more than 1
hour between patch submission and commit.
Was there any on-list discussion about th
Robin Garner wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>> Robin Garner wrote:
>>> Stefano,
>>>
>>> Which iteration of the benchmark are you timing ?
>>
>> ehm, the first.
>>
>>> This can make a huge
>>> difference (our postion is argued in our OOPSLA paper here
>>> http://www.dacapobench.org/dacapo-oopsl
Hi,
DRLVM is broken on Linux/x86_64 (SUSE9) after following commit
[r478172] Applied HARMONY-2223 [drlvm][jit][performance] Inlined int64
arithmetic
routines - speedup of 64 arithmetics. Tested on SUSE9, observed ~5%
gain on the microbenchmark.
with the following diagnostics:
/files/ss
Denis Kishenko wrote:
Dear committers, please take a look on H-1879
Is there a reason why this bug has drlvm category, and has [drlvm]
prefix? I see from the history of this bug that it was transferred back
and forth. The attached patches change only classlib test...
2006/11/22, Fedotov, A
I've filed http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2270 regarding
[EMAIL PROTECTED] failure on win XP in perTest mode
Thanks,
Tanya
Weldon, thanks for the review.
Weldon Washburn wrote:
> I tried to apply your below patch to the current svn HEAD. It looks like
> your local source tree is out of date. The patch failed.
I've attached the updated patch to HARMONY-1951. The scheme of notify_flag
modification is different from t
yes, these 2 tests passed for me too on r478168
On 11/22/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My version is svn = r478131, (Nov 22 2006), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, debug
build
2006/11/22, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It is reproduced on the r477584 on my 1CPU WinXP sp2.
> Whi
Dear committers, please take a look on H-1879
2006/11/22, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1
>-Original Message-
>From: Denis Kishenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 5:40 PM
>To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [classlib][net] issue H-1879 Htt
Doh. Of course :)
Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
Missing IPF version of exclude file. HARMONY-2266.
--
Ivan
On 11/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As an interim step to track where we are as the build-test and
harmonytest.org keep evolving, I've created a wiki page :
http://wiki
+1
>-Original Message-
>From: Denis Kishenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 5:40 PM
>To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [classlib][net] issue H-1879 HttpURLConnectionTest
>
>Alexei,
>
>Synchronization of accept() looks like test improvement, so I will
Alexei,
Synchronization of accept() looks like test improvement, so I will
attach new patch to fix H-1879 and we will try to find solution for
accept synchronization.
2006/11/22, Fedotov, Alexei A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ok, I see. Makes sense for me. I cannot imagine anything better at this
momen
Elena Semukhina wrote:
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right - my point is that excluding our thread tests is a big red flag.
I know that you and others have been working very hard to get this fixed.
I managed to run kernel tests iteratively for 40 times on linux
Missing IPF version of exclude file. HARMONY-2266.
--
Ivan
On 11/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As an interim step to track where we are as the build-test and
harmonytest.org keep evolving, I've created a wiki page :
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DRLVMTestTracking
tha
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
> On 11/22/06, Elena Semukhina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ok! mine passes w/ opt. Not hanging for me. Oh dear.
>>
>>
>> I played
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
> On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Elena Semukhina wrote:
>> > On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> As an interim step to track where we are
Elena Semukhina wrote:
On 11/22/06, Elena Semukhina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok! mine passes w/ opt. Not hanging for me. Oh dear.
I played a little with the tests trying to find some other tests which
influence the whole
Ok, I see. Makes sense for me. I cannot imagine anything better at this
moment, and if this works, that's great.
There is still a problem with accept() call which is not synchronized,
but I don't see how we can fix this correctly. accept() call is
synchronized using related ServerSocket object, bu
On 11/22/06, Elena Semukhina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok! mine passes w/ opt. Not hanging for me. Oh dear.
I played a little with the tests trying to find some other tests which
influence the whole run. Excluding java/lang/C
The kernel tests hang on Windows XP in OPT mode when running in the same VM.
This mode is default now. The tests pass in the "perTest" mode. I filed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2267 for that issue.
--
Thanks,
Elena
Stefano,
On 11/21/06, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
> Stefano,
> Trying to get the potential of Harmony I've quickly checked SciMak on
tuned
> Harmony release build and compared it with BEA & SUN.
> When I looked into Harmony OOB I've found that all hot
Great! )
Best regards,
Sveta
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 3:58 PM
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm] [test] Tracking smoke, kernel and c-unit tests by
platform
Ok - I reorganized a bit to bring all
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok! mine passes w/ opt. Not hanging for me. Oh dear.
I played a little with the tests trying to find some other tests which
influence the whole run. Excluding java/lang/ClassGenericsTest4.java helped!
The tests have not hung. I nee
Ok! mine passes w/ opt. Not hanging for me. Oh dear.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) Yes, I saw the hang yesterday (only in int, btw), but hadn't figured
out which test it was.
I
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) Yes, I saw the hang yesterday (only in int, btw), but hadn't figured
out which test it was.
I see it only for opt on Windows XP in "once" mode.
Odd. Scary. And Odd - I was a
Elena Semukhina wrote:
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
> On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> As an interim step to track where we are as the build-test and
>> harmonytest.org keep evolving, I've created a wiki pa
Ok - I reorganized a bit to bring all three links on one page
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DRLVMTestTracking
and as we add more things we are tracking, we can add to this page.
Konovalova, Svetlana wrote:
I've already done it)
Best regards,
Sveta
-Original Message-
From: Geir M
My version is svn = r478131, (Nov 22 2006), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, debug build
2006/11/22, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It is reproduced on the r477584 on my 1CPU WinXP sp2.
Which revision number I should use to verify it?
Thanks, Vladimir
-
trunk\modules\luni\bin\
It is reproduced on the r477584 on my 1CPU WinXP sp2.
Which revision number I should use to verify it?
Thanks, Vladimir
-
trunk\modules\luni\bin\test>log=false junit.textui.TestRunner
org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.ClassLoaderTest
Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyrig
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Gregory,
Thanks for your interest. The bug is reproducible on an interpreter.
It seems like a hardware exception is fired from internals of Winsock
listen() function. Could it be true?
Probably yes, this is something I've encountered in another place (see
the test crashe
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Elena Semukhina wrote:
> On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> As an interim step to track where we are as the build-test and
>> harmonytest.org keep evolving, I've created a wiki page :
>>
>> http://wiki.a
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
