Re: [DRLVM][GC] patch for Linux 32bit mode and large page support

2007-01-24 Thread Xiao-Feng Li
Ivan, I agree, esp. for the JITted code buffer if the architecture has no distinction for code and data TLB supports. So probably this large page support should be designed as a lower layer in memory management. A longer vision can be that, the lower layer MM (under GC and other memory functionali

Re: [drlvm][magic] New Magic features proposal.

2007-01-24 Thread Xiao-Feng Li
Yes, this two parts solution probably is necessary. We don't need to be purists to constrain ourselves. Thanks, xiaofeng On 1/24/07, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/24/07, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/23/07, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/2

[DRLVM][enumeration and helper inlining] magic Address fields should not be enumerated

2007-01-24 Thread Xiao-Feng Li
Hi, The current root set enumeration code has no special treatment with magic Address fields. They are taken as normal object reference fields. This is incorrect since their values are memory addresses that are not necessarily pointing to objects. Actually we probably need to keep the contract th

Re: [drlvm][smoke tests] Three smoke tests can be removed from exclude lists

2007-01-24 Thread Elena Semukhina
On 1/24/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll review and commit if you answer the following question : what changed? :) I'm nervous if we have things excluded that suddenly magically start to work again. The tests were always excluded; they were donated to Harmony with excl

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Naveen Neelakantam
[snip] If that test is locally excluded, can you un-exclude so we can get an email? The from address will be [EMAIL PROTECTED] My exclude lists are the same as what is in svn. Then it never actualy passed the tests? You caught me. :-) Actually, I've tried to openly discuss my progress

Re: how to get the time used by the OPT, JET?

2007-01-24 Thread Rana Dasgupta
Hi, For the jit guys, I have a somewhat (?) related question. When looking at the jit logs for tight loops like: for( indx = 0; indx < 1000; indx++) { afrom[indx] = afrom[indx + 1]; } which is fairly common in Spec sequences, sorts, etc. there are of course three checks during the assignmn

Re: [vote] HARMONY-2918 - reliability test suite

2007-01-24 Thread Mikhail Loenko
+1 2007/1/25, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: We now have all requisite paperwork in place for http:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2918, so lets vote to accept : [ ] +1 Accept this contribution [ ] -1 Reject because... As usual, 3 days unless someone complains they need more

Re: [vote] HARMONY-2731 : unit tests for JSSE provider

2007-01-24 Thread Mikhail Loenko
+1 2007/1/25, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: We now have all requisite paperwork in place for http:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2731, so lets vote to accept : [ ] +1 Accept this contribution [ ] -1 Reject because... As usual, 3 days unless someone complains they need more

Re: [build-test] doesn't work OOB?

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 25, 2007, at 12:34 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: My comments: 1) The string like set CRUISE_PATH=%CRUISE_PATH%;%ANT_HOME%\lib\ant-apache-regexp.jar was initially added to the cruisecontrol.bat (sh) files to fix issue with 'replaceregexp'. It works for me so I'll try to find RH or ubuntu6

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 25, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:01 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:12 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: On

Re: [build-test] doesn't work OOB?

2007-01-24 Thread Vladimir Ivanov
My comments: 1) The string like set CRUISE_PATH=%CRUISE_PATH%;%ANT_HOME%\lib\ant-apache-regexp.jar was initially added to the cruisecontrol.bat (sh) files to fix issue with 'replaceregexp'. It works for me so I'll try to find RH or ubuntu6 to verify it again. 2) noisy warnings will be deleted in

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Naveen Neelakantam
On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:01 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:12 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On

Re: [vote] HARMONY-2731 : unit tests for JSSE provider

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
+1 On Jan 25, 2007, at 12:24 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: We now have all requisite paperwork in place for http:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2731, so lets vote to accept : [ ] +1 Accept this contribution [ ] -1 Reject because... As usual, 3 days unless someone complains they nee

[vote] HARMONY-2731 : unit tests for JSSE provider

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
We now have all requisite paperwork in place for http:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2731, so lets vote to accept : [ ] +1 Accept this contribution [ ] -1 Reject because... As usual, 3 days unless someone complains they need more time.

Re: [classlib][general] How to test the performance of Harmony

2007-01-24 Thread Leo Li
On 1/25/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Robin Garner wrote: [SNIP] > http://cs.anu.edu.au/people/Robin.Garner/dacapo/regression/ - My > focus is on DaCapo correctness, the performance test isn't > particularly rigorous. > > IMO for harmony track

Re: [vote] HARMONY-2918 - reliability test suite

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
+1 On Jan 25, 2007, at 12:03 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: We now have all requisite paperwork in place for http:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2918, so lets vote to accept : [ ] +1 Accept this contribution [ ] -1 Reject because... As usual, 3 days unless someone complains they nee

[vote] HARMONY-2918 - reliability test suite

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
We now have all requisite paperwork in place for http:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2918, so lets vote to accept : [ ] +1 Accept this contribution [ ] -1 Reject because... As usual, 3 days unless someone complains they need more time.

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:12 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: Umm.

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Naveen Neelakantam
On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:12 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: Umm... I get that failure. I just haven't got around to rep

Re: [drlvm][verifier] verifier behavior is not compatible with RI

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 22, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Ivan Popov wrote: I've tested instrumented class against Sun JDK 1.5 and 1.6 with -Xfuture option, which "turns on stricter class-file format checks that enforce closer conformance to the class-file format specification" [1]. That's funny. You'd think that the RI

Re: [doc][website] finalizing changes to nav pane

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 22, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote: Hi, about Just wondering. I thought we were having a discussion about that stuff... I double-checked the thread, seems like no more open navbar related issues remain. The recent emails mostly concern restructuring of project guideline

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:12 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: Umm... I get that failure. I just haven't got around to reporting it. LOL. Don't let us rush you or anything... O

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Naveen Neelakantam
On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: Umm... I get that failure. I just haven't got around to reporting it. LOL. Don't let us rush you or anything... Ok. :-) My CC reports to www.harmonytest.org as "UIUC"

Re: [classlib][general] How to test the performance of Harmony

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Robin Garner wrote: [SNIP] http://cs.anu.edu.au/people/Robin.Garner/dacapo/regression/ - My focus is on DaCapo correctness, the performance test isn't particularly rigorous. IMO for harmony tracking SPECjvm98, SPECjbb2005 and dacapo would be a good start.

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: Umm... I get that failure. I just haven't got around to reporting it. LOL. Don't let us rush you or anything... My CC reports to www.harmonytest.org as "UIUC". It's been failing for a while. Which reminds me, should my CC set

Re: [classlib][general] How to test the performance of Harmony

2007-01-24 Thread Robin Garner
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:34 PM, Leo Li wrote: Hi, all: With the progress of Harmony project, I think, performance is gradually becoming an important feature for our real customers. Besides the stability and compatibility, users would incline to choose the one wit

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Naveen Neelakantam
Umm... I get that failure. I just haven't got around to reporting it. My CC reports to www.harmonytest.org as "UIUC". It's been failing for a while. Which reminds me, should my CC setup be sending emails to the alerts email? Naveen On Jan 24, 2007, at 8:35 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote

Re: [classlib][general] How to test the performance of Harmony

2007-01-24 Thread Jin Mingjian
We can do multiple benchmark tests. I recommend the SciMark2 (http://math.nist.gov/scimark2/) for scientific and numerical computing performance benchmark. The result can be used to compare Java with other language(such as C/C++) in the field of numerical computing as well as different JVM perform

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Ah ha. Ok, so we have a difference. I'll isolate out of CC using DRLVM, and then flip to J9 to see. But it's really failing for me :) geir On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:40 PM, Tony Wu wrote: IBM VME, I did not use CC. On 1/25/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And what VM? On J

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Tony Wu
IBM VME, I did not use CC. On 1/25/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And what VM? On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Tony Wu wrote: > I just finished all tests with classlib r499503 on my ubuntu6 x86. > There is no failure in DateFormatSymbolsTest. > > On 1/25/07, Geir Magnusson Jr.

Re: [classlib][general] How to test the performance of Harmony

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:34 PM, Leo Li wrote: Hi, all: With the progress of Harmony project, I think, performance is gradually becoming an important feature for our real customers. Besides the stability and compatibility, users would incline to choose the one with higher speed. Aside fro

[classlib][general] How to test the performance of Harmony

2007-01-24 Thread Leo Li
Hi, all: With the progress of Harmony project, I think, performance is gradually becoming an important feature for our real customers. Besides the stability and compatibility, users would incline to choose the one with higher speed. Aside from VM, classlib itself also plays a significant role

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
And what VM? On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Tony Wu wrote: I just finished all tests with classlib r499503 on my ubuntu6 x86. There is no failure in DateFormatSymbolsTest. On 1/25/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just got CC working on the Ubunut 6 x86 box, and now that I kno

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
:/ Using CC? I'll test with and w/o CC geir On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Tony Wu wrote: I just finished all tests with classlib r499503 on my ubuntu6 x86. There is no failure in DateFormatSymbolsTest. On 1/25/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just got CC working on the Ub

Re: [drlvm][opt] How to get object access sequence during runtime.

2007-01-24 Thread zouqiong
You are right. If the only change you do is a new extra call in translator it will limit optimizations. The best place to add tracing calls could be hir2lir conversion, after all HLO optimizations were finished, but in this case your helper can't be inlined. If you want your helper to be inlined

Re: [classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Tony Wu
I just finished all tests with classlib r499503 on my ubuntu6 x86. There is no failure in DateFormatSymbolsTest. On 1/25/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just got CC working on the Ubunut 6 x86 box, and now that I know to ignore the 'replaceregexp' error (ahem!) and the mislea

[classlib] anyone else seeing a failure in o.a.h.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest#test_hashCode ? (ubuntu x86)

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
I just got CC working on the Ubunut 6 x86 box, and now that I know to ignore the 'replaceregexp' error (ahem!) and the misleading warnings about being unable to load various classlib exclude files... I get a failure in org.apache.harmony.text.tests.java.text.DateFormatSymbolsTest in the

Re: [build-test] doesn't work OOB?

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Ok - now I'm starting to understand this better. The replaceregexp was probably some kind of post processing error. We gotta get rid of this. We also should try and get rid of the noisy warnings : Unable to load file: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/geir/dev/ apache/harmony/enhanced

Re: [build-test] doesn't work OOB?

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 8:31 PM, Naveen Neelakantam wrote: I was getting that error too! I could not for the life of me figure out what was going on. I even wrote a test ant script that uses replaceregexp, and it worked fine. Go figure. I looked through the build file and discovered that r

Re: [build-test] doesn't work OOB?

2007-01-24 Thread Naveen Neelakantam
I was getting that error too! I could not for the life of me figure out what was going on. I even wrote a test ant script that uses replaceregexp, and it worked fine. Go figure. I looked through the build file and discovered that replaceregexp is only run as a postprocessing step in the

Re: [build-test] doesn't work OOB?

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Ok - I had a small local problem, but I'm still not able to run everything passing. For classlib-drlvm, I get : BUILD FAILED Ant Error Message: /home/geir/dev/apache/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/ trunk/cc/projects/classlib/trunk/build.xml:167: The following error occurred while executing thi

Re: [porting] FreeBSD (rambling)

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Oh, one more thing... Well done!!! :) geir On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Mark Hindess wrote: I've checked in the changes (and some horrible hacks) that I needed to get Classlib to compile on FreeBSD/x86. The next things on this partic

Re: [porting] FreeBSD (rambling)

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Mark Hindess wrote: I've checked in the changes (and some horrible hacks) that I needed to get Classlib to compile on FreeBSD/x86. The next things on this particular todo list are: 1) Document what I had to install on top of the default 6.1- RELEASE. (I used t

[porting] FreeBSD (rambling)

2007-01-24 Thread Mark Hindess
I've checked in the changes (and some horrible hacks) that I needed to get Classlib to compile on FreeBSD/x86. The next things on this particular todo list are: 1) Document what I had to install on top of the default 6.1-RELEASE. (I used this version because it ran under qemu but I'll probably

Re: [vmi] thread library

2007-01-24 Thread Salikh Zakirov
Tim Ellison wrote: > This means that the VMI would have: > - GetPortLibrary(...) = gets portlib function table > - GetVMLSFunctions(...) = gets VM local storage functions > - GetThreadLibrary(...) = get thread library function table *new* > - all the other dross... > > I'm aware that exte

Re: [vmi] thread library

2007-01-24 Thread Tim Ellison
Alexey Petrenko wrote: > in fact, after last fixes, hythr library from DRLVM should work with IBM > VME... While that may be true at the moment, I foresee the same thing happening again and again. Agreeing on an API rather than an impl. may be easier. Regards, Tim

Re: [vmi] thread library

2007-01-24 Thread Tim Ellison
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: > >> Another attempt to resolve the threadlib mismatch problem between >> classlib and VM Apologies to those who have been round this loop >> multiple times already. >> >> The original intent of the hythr.dll was to pro

Re: [classlib][pack200] Can anyone apply Harmony-2957?

2007-01-24 Thread Alexei Zakharov
It was in my TODO list for tomorrow, but please take it if you like. Regards, 2007/1/24, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: sorry about the delay - I'll look into it later if no one beats me to it On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Not that I'm going out of my way to be

Re: Re: [classlib][pack200] Can anyone apply Harmony-2957?

2007-01-24 Thread Alex Blewitt
Thanks, that would be great. Alex. On 24/01/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: sorry about the delay - I'll look into it later if no one beats me to it On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Alex Blewitt wrote: > Not that I'm going out of my way to be repetitive, but this has been > in

[build-test] doesn't work OOB?

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
OOB == out of the box I tried to do a fresh checkout of build-test on two different machines, and it doesn't work OOB. I'm going to figure out why when I get back from the gym, but if anyone has a timesaving hint, let me know (and I'll fix it). I also want to switch it to use the federat

Re: [vmi] thread library

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: Another attempt to resolve the threadlib mismatch problem between classlib and VM Apologies to those who have been round this loop multiple times already. The original intent of the hythr.dll was to provide a thread library that was shared bet

Re: [classlib][pack200] Can anyone apply Harmony-2957?

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
sorry about the delay - I'll look into it later if no one beats me to it On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Alex Blewitt wrote: Not that I'm going out of my way to be repetitive, but this has been in the queue for a couple of weeks now. Is anyone going to be able to apply it in the near future, or i

Re: [vmi] thread library

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
thanks - this was on my list of issues to flog for the day! geir On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: Another attempt to resolve the threadlib mismatch problem between classlib and VM Apologies to those who have been round this loop multiple times already. The original intent of

Re: [classlib][pack200] Can anyone apply Harmony-2957?

2007-01-24 Thread Alex Blewitt
Not that I'm going out of my way to be repetitive, but this has been in the queue for a couple of weeks now. Is anyone going to be able to apply it in the near future, or is that just wishful thinking on my part? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2957 Alex On 19/01/07, Alex Blewitt

Re: [vmi] thread library

2007-01-24 Thread Alexey Petrenko
Tim, in fact, after last fixes, hythr library from DRLVM should work with IBM VME... SY, Alexey 2007/1/24, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Another attempt to resolve the threadlib mismatch problem between classlib and VM Apologies to those who have been round this loop multiple times alread

[vmi] thread library

2007-01-24 Thread Tim Ellison
Another attempt to resolve the threadlib mismatch problem between classlib and VM Apologies to those who have been round this loop multiple times already. The original intent of the hythr.dll was to provide a thread library that was shared between the VM and class library code. But as we know,

Re: [portlib][testing][em64t] the native tests of portlib module are hangs up on the em64t linux

2007-01-24 Thread Tim Ellison
Alexey Varlamov wrote: > Grr. It appears the code in > working_classlib\modules\portlib\src\main\native\thread\unix\x86_64\thrspinlock.s > > is a complete bogus, it is copy-pasted from x86 almost verbatim and > never worked. > The tests PASS with drlvm's libhythr.so. > > So we face again glorifie

Re: [classlib] VM interface docs ?

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
let me know if you aren't working on this... On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Jan 24, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote: Hi, I've got another idea about placing Doxygen docs: have the generated docs as we agreed but also have a starting page with links on t

Re: [DRLVM][GC] patch for Linux 32bit mode and large page support

2007-01-24 Thread Ivan Volosyuk
Is the VM arguments for large TLB pages support are compatible with the same of GCv4.1 or different? Just interesting. One more observation, it makes sense to use large TLB pages for all VM including classloader pools and other code not just for GC. -- Ivan On 1/24/07, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [drlvm][magic] New Magic features proposal.

2007-01-24 Thread Mikhail Fursov
On 1/24/07, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/23/07, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/23/07, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Based on my prior experience with M2N frame work, I have the same > > feeling that compiler instrinsic might be able to deal

Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-2914) [classlib][archive] RFE: java.util.zip.ZipFile(File file) wastes file handlers on Linux

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
but strace simply tells you about system behavior at runtime right? no source is involved? geir On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Tony Wu wrote: IIRC, the ACQ we have signed made some restrictions on touching the source code of RI. I thought the activities which may be considered as "accessing

Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-2914) [classlib][archive] RFE: java.util.zip.ZipFile(File file) wastes file handlers on Linux

2007-01-24 Thread Tony Wu
IIRC, the ACQ we have signed made some restrictions on touching the source code of RI. I thought the activities which may be considered as "accessing the source code" should be prevented, otherwise one would disqualify from committing to the repository here at Apache Harmony. If you think that it

RE: Re: [classlib][drlvm] VM interface docs ?

2007-01-24 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
>In order to improve it, some number of \mainpage's needs to be written, >and this in turn needs to the target audience to be identified and the >tasks >that we want to help audience to achieve. +1, +2 if this means I'm both hands in it:) We're having an open JIRA with the first mainpage content, H

Re: [classlib][drlvm] VM interface docs ?

2007-01-24 Thread Salikh Zakirov
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote: > Hi, > As a first attempt, I've posted the generated drlvm Doxygen bundles on > the website. > [1] http://harmony.apache.org/subcomponents/drlvm/DoxygenStart.html is > the starting page with links to all the bundles. > [2] http://harmony.apache.org/subcomponents/drlvm/i

Re: [classlib] VM interface docs ?

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote: Hi, I've got another idea about placing Doxygen docs: have the generated docs as we agreed but also have a starting page with links on the website. We even have this page - see the svn source tree, trunk/vm/doc/DoxygenStart.html. Does anybo

RE: [classlib][drlvm] VM interface docs ?

2007-01-24 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
Hi, As a first attempt, I've posted the generated drlvm Doxygen bundles on the website. [1] http://harmony.apache.org/subcomponents/drlvm/DoxygenStart.html is the starting page with links to all the bundles. [2] http://harmony.apache.org/subcomponents/drlvm/intf/html/index.html is the starting pa

Re: [drlvm][smoke tests] Three smoke tests can be removed from exclude lists

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
I'll review and commit if you answer the following question : what changed? :) I'm nervous if we have things excluded that suddenly magically start to work again. geir On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Elena Semukhina wrote: I've discovered that three smoke tests now pass while they failed int

Re: [general] aiming no regression

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
it's terrifying how many awt excludes there are... geir On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:54 AM, tatyana doubtsova wrote: I've attached the patch with exlude lists with known intermittent failures for awt, archive, luni, nio, security modules to * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2970*issue

Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-2914) [classlib][archive] RFE: java.util.zip.ZipFile(File file) wastes file handlers on Linux

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Tony Wu wrote: I think it is implementation detail. Harmony holds the handler when the ZipFile is created. For performance concern, it is ok to follow RI. What's your opinion? And I would argue that it is not very proper to use something like strace to detect the d

Re: [classlib][native-code][test] How about use some unit test tools to write native unit test code?

2007-01-24 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 3:20 AM, Mark Hindess wrote: On 24 January 2007 at 15:58, "Spark Shen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All: As I said previously, I want to write some native unit tests. Now, all of the native test code are of the following 2 forms: 1. native mains 2. java mains + jni

Re: [classlib][portlib] the portlib tests failed to compile on Windows platform

2007-01-24 Thread Mark Hindess
On 24 January 2007 at 19:48, "Vladimir Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/24/07, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 24 January 2007 at 18:54, "Vladimir Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Seems, it does not work :( > > > > What is the output in the generated

Re: [classlib][portlib] the portlib tests failed to compile on Windows platform

2007-01-24 Thread Vladimir Ivanov
On 1/24/07, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 24 January 2007 at 18:54, "Vladimir Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems, it does not work :( What is the output in the generated test report? You can browse to it but it will probably be in a file called: build/test_report/html/

Re: [classlib][portlib] the portlib tests failed to compile on Windows platform

2007-01-24 Thread Mark Hindess
On 24 January 2007 at 18:54, "Vladimir Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems, it does not work :( What is the output in the generated test report? You can browse to it but it will probably be in a file called: build/test_report/html/native/portlib/1_hyfile-out.txt FYI: I've added mor

RE: [classlib] VM interface docs ?

2007-01-24 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
Hi, I've got another idea about placing Doxygen docs: have the generated docs as we agreed but also have a starting page with links on the website. We even have this page - see the svn source tree, trunk/vm/doc/DoxygenStart.html. Does anybody mind if I add such a page to our website svn? Cheers,

[drlvm][thread manager] Two smoke tests hang on linux

2007-01-24 Thread Elena Semukhina
We have two smoke tests which are excluded on linux because they hang intermittently. I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3044 to track the issue and provided some debug info. Could anyone have a look/try to reproduce/comment on? Possibly this is a known issue. -- Thanks, E

[drlvm][smoke tests] Three smoke tests can be removed from exclude lists

2007-01-24 Thread Elena Semukhina
I've discovered that three smoke tests now pass while they failed intermittently 2-3 months ago. I ran the tests iteratively hundreds of times. Possibly some recent commits fixed some stuff which caused the tests to fail. The tests are gc/SynchronizedFinilazersTest.java init/ErrorInInitializer.

Re: [classlib][portlib] the portlib tests failed to compile on Windows platform

2007-01-24 Thread Vladimir Ivanov
Seems, it does not work :( Output is (note, it does not depend on if/unless in the string wrote: On 24 January 2007 at 15:53, "Vladimir Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Mark, > now these tests compiled on windows platform but one of them failed: > -run-native-tests: > [mkdir]

Re: [general] aiming no regression

2007-01-24 Thread tatyana doubtsova
I've attached the patch with exlude lists with known intermittent failures for awt, archive, luni, nio, security modules to * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2970* Alexei (Zakharov), could you, please, apply the patch? There is al

Re: [VM] Not possible to set custom security manager via system property

2007-01-24 Thread Stepan Mishura
On 1/23/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote: Stepan, Apparently this is kernel classes responsibility to initialize SecurityManager. And it is hard to believe, but DRLVM just missed this functionality. Could you please create a JIRA with regression test? I'm going to fix this in drlvm now. See HARMONY

Re: [classlib][portlib] the portlib tests failed to compile on Windows platform

2007-01-24 Thread Mark Hindess
On 24 January 2007 at 15:53, "Vladimir Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Mark, > now these tests compiled on windows platform but one of them failed: > -run-native-tests: > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\harmony.top\classlib\trunk\build\test_report > [echo] init: passed > [echo

Re: Please close the following AWT issues

2007-01-24 Thread Alexei Zakharov
Applied. Regards, 2007/1/24, Pavlenko, Andrey A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Alexey, Thank you very much for the great work! I've attached the patch to HARMONY-2445, please apply it too. -Original Message- From: Alexei Zakharov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 9:54 PM

RE: Please close the following AWT issues

2007-01-24 Thread Pavlenko, Andrey A
Alexey, Thank you very much for the great work! I've attached the patch to HARMONY-2445, please apply it too. -Original Message- From: Alexei Zakharov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 9:54 PM To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: Please close the following AWT

Re: [classlib][sql] Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-3017) [classlib][sql] Implementation for SerialClob constructors,getCharacterStream(), and length() methods.

2007-01-24 Thread Alexei Zakharov
Andrew, It will be nice if you can post a separate patch for manifest or add a comment to JIRA about what exactly should be changed. I don't use eclipse currently so I can't test it by myself. Regards, 2007/1/24, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 1/23/07, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [classlib][portlib] the portlib tests failed to compile on Windows platform

2007-01-24 Thread Vladimir Ivanov
Thanks Mark, now these tests compiled on windows platform but one of them failed: -run-native-tests: [mkdir] Created dir: C:\harmony.top\classlib\trunk\build\test_report [echo] init: passed [echo] hyerror: passed [echo] hytime: passed [exec] Result: 1 [echo] hyfile: FAILED

Re: [drlvm][opt] How to get object access sequence during runtime.

2007-01-24 Thread Mikhail Fursov
On 1/24/07, zouqiong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: En, I don't know whether OPT can eliminate such code: aload_0 getfield 5 aload_0 aload_0 ==>getfield 5 getfield 5 dup If it can eliminate them; I add tracing code as follows: aload_0

Re: [drlvm][opt] How to get object access sequence during runtime.

2007-01-24 Thread Mikhail Fursov
On 1/24/07, zouqiong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It means that Chip Multi-processor. I want to know whether there're some optimization face to CMP. Ok, now it's clear. It's sad to say but I'm not an expert in this area, so I can't advise. Ian, Thank you for your link. The list of Java related

Re: [drlvm][opt] How to get object access sequence during runtime.

2007-01-24 Thread Ian Rogers
Hi Zuoqiong, there's a lot of research and Java and CMPs. For example, the Jamaica project at the University of Manchester: http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/apt/projects/jamaica/ has been looking at runtime adaptive parallelizing compilers (see also IBM's Ninja project). There's also significant

Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-2914) [classlib][archive] RFE: java.util.zip.ZipFile(File file) wastes file handlers on Linux

2007-01-24 Thread Tony Wu
I think it is implementation detail. Harmony holds the handler when the ZipFile is created. For performance concern, it is ok to follow RI. What's your opinion? And I would argue that it is not very proper to use something like strace to detect the detail behavior of RI. On 12/28/06, Nina Rinska

Re: [classlib][native-code][test] How about use some unit test tools to write native unit test code?

2007-01-24 Thread Spark Shen
Agree with you that current test case is "porting-guarantee" tests. Not functional test. And these kinds of test may not need a huge test framework. But, there are cases where java test is not convenient. For example, file read/write priviledges on unix like platform to name a few. Different user

Re: [classlib][native-code][test] How about use some unit test tools to write native unit test code?

2007-01-24 Thread Mark Hindess
On 24 January 2007 at 15:58, "Spark Shen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All: > > As I said previously, I want to write some native unit tests. Now, all > of the native test code are of the following 2 forms: > 1. native mains > 2. java mains + jni methods > > How about introduce some automa