I am not sure which classes are loaded during the Security.getProvider() for
both harmony and RI, and I found another interesting thing that is the time
spent on Class.newInstance() on both harmony and RI are almost the same
though the time on the Class.forName() are different so much.
2010/7/24
Hi Tim
Actually I mean Class.forName() in theSecurity.getProvider() invocation
stack. So I can be sure our security implementation loads much more classes
than RI's one. Thanks for your question, I think on the above mail I talked
so generally.
2010/7/24 Tim Ellison
> On 22/Jul/2010 11:42, Deven
On 22/Jul/2010 06:07, Ray Chen wrote:
> Hi All,
> I found that our security implementation is much slower than RI's when
> get an algorithm instance.
> I have done some investigation and found that most time are consumed
> on loading and initialising providers.
> Following is the test cases and res
On 22/Jul/2010 11:42, Deven You wrote:
> Profiling results show RI's Class.forName() takes much less time than
> Harmony ones. It may caused by harmony load too much classes, maybe we need
> consider load providers only needed.
You mean "Class.forName()" loading the same class (i.e. the time to
se
Profiling results show RI's Class.forName() takes much less time than
Harmony ones. It may caused by harmony load too much classes, maybe we need
consider load providers only needed.
2010/7/22 Regis
> On 2010-07-22 14:26, Ray Chen wrote:
>
>> Hi Regis,
>> You mean init these providers is slow, r
On 2010-07-22 14:26, Ray Chen wrote:
Hi Regis,
You mean init these providers is slow, right? But actually we should
not init unnecessary providers.
I added some info in our code as following and you can see init these
provider takes most of the time:
...
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
Hi Regis,
You mean init these providers is slow, right? But actually we should
not init unnecessary providers.
I added some info in our code as following and you can see init these
provider takes most of the time:
...
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
p = (Provider) Class.forName(providerC
On 2010-07-22 13:07, Ray Chen wrote:
Hi All,
I found that our security implementation is much slower than RI's when
get an algorithm instance.
I have done some investigation and found that most time are consumed
on loading and initialising providers.
Following is the test cases and results to sho
