Randomly distributed tables make Hawq2.x more elastic: big queries use more
resources, while small queries will use less resources.
But hash distributed table need to use the same number of resource as the
bucket number of table, no matter the query cost is large or small. As a
result, a scan on a
Hi all,
I have received a fair number of questions on the topic of handling data
locality and co-located joins in HAWQ 2. Most of the questions are coming
from the background where HAWQ 1.x defaulted to HASH distributed tables
distributed by a key and hence resulted in local joins in most cases fo
