Re: Using postgreSql jdbc driver instead of greenplum driver

Add GPDB community in thread as well. Best regards, Ruilong Huo On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Arman wrote: > Hi > What is the difference of greenPlum jdbc driver and postgreSql jdbc driver. > I used postgreSql jdbc driver and successfully connected to hawq

Re: [gpdb-users] Re: Using postgreSql jdbc driver instead of greenplum driver

As far as I know there is no difference. The driver is the same Dave Cramer On 19 September 2016 at 06:51, Ruilong Huo wrote: > Add GPDB community in thread as well. > > Best regards, > Ruilong Huo > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Arman >

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC3

+1 on HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC3. Compiled and did a RAT check. On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Lili Ma wrote: > Downloaded, compiled, installed, initialized, and ran some queries for > Apache > HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC3 successfully. > > +1 > > Thanks, > Lili > > On Sun,

Re: [gpdb-users] Re: Using postgreSql jdbc driver instead of greenplum driver

There is very little difference (as far as I am aware), Greenplum JDBC driver will set server name as Greenplum On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: > As far as I know there is no difference. The driver is the same > > Dave Cramer > > On 19 September 2016 at

[GitHub] incubator-hawq-docs pull request #10: miscellaneous doc updates and clarific...

GitHub user lisakowen opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hawq-docs/pull/10 miscellaneous doc updates and clarifications - add reverse DNS requirement - clean up AWS config page - clarify predefined vs. internal data types - add JSON plug-in

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC3

-1 : The Apache HAWQ incubator project has references to two Apache Category X licenses (Artistic License - licenses/LICENSE-plper.txt: - JSON 2.27 project (src/include/catalog/JSON - licenses/LICENSE-json.txt) - PL/Perl (src/pl/plperl - licenses/LICENSE-plperj.txt) Justin Mclean