date:20101222

RE: provide a 0.20-append tarball?

2010-12-22 Thread Jonathan Gray

Agreed it's not an ASF requirement. Just stating my opinion and sense from others. An additional motivation and benefit of the Apache 20-append repository and release is a de facto record of what patches are actually required to achieve the requirement you just laid out (works well with HBase

Hudson build is back to normal : hbase-0.90 #43

2010-12-22 Thread Apache Hudson Server

See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/hbase-0.90/43/changes

Build failed in Hudson: HBase-TRUNK #1694

2010-12-22 Thread Apache Hudson Server

See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/HBase-TRUNK/1694/changes Changes: [stack] HBASE-3381 -- correction -- [...truncated 2877 lines...] Tests run: 41, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 3, Time elapsed: 353.991 sec Running

Re: provide a 0.20-append tarball?

2010-12-22 Thread Stack

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: If we draw a line, then as an ASF community we should have a fallback option somewhere in ASF-land for the user to try. Vanilla Hadoop is not sufficient for HBase. Therefore, I propose we make a Hadoop 0.20-append

Re: provide a 0.20-append tarball?

2010-12-22 Thread Andrew Purtell

From: Stack If we draw a line, then as an ASF community we should have a fallback option somewhere in ASF-land for the user to try. Vanilla Hadoop is not sufficient for HBase. Therefore, I propose we make a Hadoop 0.20-append tarball available. What you thinking Andrew? I was

Re: provide a 0.20-append tarball?

2010-12-22 Thread Stack

(I moved this topic to dev@hbase.apache.org from user). On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Gary Helmling ghelml...@gmail.com wrote: What you have there currently seems accurate. So I don't think it needs to mention HBASE-3194 directly. Maybe add a note that we try to support Hadoop 0.20.x

Re: Hudson build is back to normal : hbase-0.90 #43

2010-12-22 Thread Ted Yu

I applied my patch for HBASE-3305 to 0.90 branch All unit tests passed. On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote: RC! On Dec 22, 2010 6:47 AM, Apache Hudson Server hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote: See

Re: Review Request: HBASE-2312: Rename HLog Dir when Splitting

2010-12-22 Thread stack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://review.cloudera.org/r/396/#review2146 --- Ship it! Below looks good. Doesn't work w/o the hadoop issues? I

Build failed in Hudson: HBase-TRUNK #1695

2010-12-22 Thread Apache Hudson Server

See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/HBase-TRUNK/1695/changes Changes: [jdcryans] Adding a fix for this test that was missing [stack] HBASE-3381 Interrupt of a region open comes across as a successful open; second attempt -- [...truncated 2878

Build failed in Hudson: hbase-0.90 #44

2010-12-22 Thread Apache Hudson Server

See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/hbase-0.90/44/changes Changes: [stack] HBASE-3388 NPE processRegionInTransition(AssignmentManager.java:264) doing rolling-restart.sh [jdcryans] HBASE-3386 NPE in TableRecordReaderImpl.restart [stack] HBASE-3381 Interrupt of a region open comes across

Re: provide a 0.20-append tarball?

2010-12-22 Thread Stack

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Let me ask Dhruba what he thinks about making a 0.20-append release (He's the release manager). Will also sound out the hadoop pmc since they'll have an opinion. I asked Dhruba. He's fine w/ a release off tip of

Build failed in Hudson: HBase-TRUNK #1696

2010-12-22 Thread Apache Hudson Server

See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/HBase-TRUNK/1696/changes Changes: [stack] HBASE-3388 NPE processRegionInTransition(AssignmentManager.java:264) doing rolling-restart.sh [jdcryans] HBASE-3386 NPE in TableRecordReaderImpl.restart -- [...truncated