TestRegionRebalancing hangs in TRUNK

2011-07-31 Thread Ted Yu
Hi, As you can see from the bottom of https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-TRUNK/2065/console, TestRegionRebalancing hangs. I found the following in the outout.txt of this test which didn't appear in previous (successful) test execution: 2011-07-31 10:56:16,384 DEBUG [

Re: HBASE-4089 HBASE-4147 - on the topic of ops output

2011-07-31 Thread Fuad Efendi
What is it all about? HBase sucks. Too many problems to newcomers, few-weeks-warm-up to begin with Is it really-really supported by Microsoft employees?! And, SEO of course: === -- Fuad Efendi 416-993-2060 Tokenizer Inc., Canada Data Mining,

Re: HBASE-4089 HBASE-4147 - on the topic of ops output

2011-07-31 Thread Ryan Rawson
You should ask for your money back!! On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Fuad Efendi f...@efendi.ca wrote: What is it all about? HBase sucks. Too many problems to newcomers, few-weeks-warm-up to begin with Is it really-really supported by Microsoft employees?!

Re: HBASE-4089 HBASE-4147 - on the topic of ops output

2011-07-31 Thread Fuad Efendi
Great, My VP is former MS-98 :))) (BTW, many thanks to http://www.cloudera.com/ employees; please make Whirr really rŠŠŠ open source? I don't see any meaningŠ reinventing a bike is cheaper nowadays!!!) And, SEO of course: (remember: Google is SMARTER!!! You are just clone.)

Re: HBASE-4089 HBASE-4147 - on the topic of ops output

2011-07-31 Thread Doug Meil
re: Whirr I'm sure Cloudera would love to hear your feedback on Whirr, but please address it to them directly and not on the Hbase dist-list. re: Is it really-really supported by Microsoft employees?! It is really, really not. As you pointed out, and as is cited in the Apache Hbase book,

Is there any influence to the read performance if setting the TTL of a table?

2011-07-31 Thread Zhoushuaifeng
I do some test and find that the scan performance getting worse after I setting the TTL of a table. Is there any explain to this? Or TTL is not the case, there may be other reason of the worse performance? Zhou Shuaifeng(Frank)

Re: heapSize() implementation of KeyValue

2011-07-31 Thread Ryan Rawson
Each array is really a pointer to an array (hence the references), then we are taking account of the overhead of the 'bytes' array itself. And I see 3 integers pasted in, so things are looking good to me On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Akash Ashok thehellma...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,     I

Re: heapSize() implementation of KeyValue

2011-07-31 Thread Akash Ashok
Three integers are pasted in but private int length is already taken care of by //Size of int length ClassSize.align(length) + So only 2 more integers are left right ? On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Ryan Rawson ryano...@gmail.com wrote: Each array is really a pointer to an array (hence

Re: heapSize() implementation of KeyValue

2011-07-31 Thread Akash Ashok
Sorry I think thats the length of the Array being taken care of not the size of the int itself. My bad i confused it with size of the int itself. I think that explains it. Thanks a lot :) On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Akash Ashok thehellma...@gmail.com wrote: Three integers are pasted in