chunhui shen created HBASE-11234:
Summary: FastDiffDeltaEncoder#getFirstKeyInBlock returns wrong
result
Key: HBASE-11234
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11234
Project: HBase
I'm in favor of integration into trunk sooner than later (it's overdue,
IMHO).
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1 for merge to trunk now.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We would like to give an update
Hi,
I am not able to checkout the code from github (using TortoiseGit in
Windows). Any clue why ? Any access permissions required ?
git.exe clone --recursive--progress -v
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase.git;
D:\HADOOP\hbase\GIT\apache.svn.latest.trunk\hbase
Hey,
It works for me. Alternatively you can try from
https://github.com/apache/hbase.git as well (mirror),
- Bharath
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Kashif Jawed Siddiqui
kashi...@huawei.comwrote:
Hi,
I am not able to checkout the code from github (using TortoiseGit
in Windows).
Gustavo Anatoly created HBASE-11235:
---
Summary: Backport fix for HBASE-11212 - Fix increment index in
KeyValueSortReducer
Key: HBASE-11235
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11235
I would be in favor of a merge to trunk, but next week some time after all
issues slated for the 0.98.3 release have been committed through trunk.
Otherwise the rebasing, new review, and probable new test failures would
mean the RC misses the deadline significantly.
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014,
Hi ,
Version is 0.92.1 .
I'm a newbie to hbase ,Please guide me what to do in the scenario .
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/tables-are-not-storing-tp4059458p4059523.html
Sent from the HBase Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
In 0.92, there is HBaseFsck (aka hbck) but it is very old - last fix was on
2012-09-09.
Can you run hbck to see if it reports any inconsistencies ?
When you search in master log, do you see names of old tables ?
Please consider upgrading your deployment to newer releases when you have a
chance.
Infra has closed the migration ticket.
I looked at tags for trunk/master and 0.98, and these look fine.
Unfortunately there are differences between SVN checkouts and Git
checkouts. SVN has changes on trunk/master and 0.98 that did not make it
over to Git looks like.
master/trunk:
Jimmy Xiang created HBASE-11236:
---
Summary: Last flushed sequence id is ignored by ServerManager
Key: HBASE-11236
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11236
Project: HBase
Issue
Andrew:
The diff shown in http://pastebin.com/Pvk3BH4i corresponds to HBASE-11219
which was integrated to master and 0.98 last night.
In my local git workspace for 0.98, I do see this change.
FYI
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
Infra has closed the
So someone made a commit to SVN **after** the migration was in progress??
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew:
The diff shown in http://pastebin.com/Pvk3BH4i corresponds to HBASE-11219
which was integrated to master and 0.98 last night.
In my local git
No Andy. Those were commits to Git after the migration.
-Anoop-
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.orgwrote:
So someone made a commit to SVN **after** the migration was in progress??
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew:
Pardon, I may have reversed your meaning. Did you mean that HBASE-11219 was
committed to Git last night? I don't see an all clear sent to dev@
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
So someone made a commit to SVN **after** the migration was in progress??
That is unfortunate, because there was not an all clear sent to dev@. I
suppose we are lucky that otherwise the diffs are fine. So I guess it's
open season on the Git repo then. Would have been nice for folks to have
waited for Stack or someone else to write back verifying file contents were
The migration from SVN to Git has completed and folks have begun committing
to the new repository already.
See https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git
Clone from https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase.git
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devaraj Das resolved HBASE-11214.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to hbase-10070 branch. Thanks for the review, Enis.
Fixes for
What Andy said.
I checked trunk and 0.96 branch content (compensating for above commits).
I confirmed list of branches and tags are the same.
Thanks for sending the note saying repo is open again Andy.
St.Ack
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
That
What is the relationship between
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase.git and git://
git.apache.org/hbase.git ? The latter is a read-only tracking repo?
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
The migration from SVN to Git has completed and folks
That is my understanding. Only HTTPS to git-wip-us supports authentication
for commit.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the relationship between
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase.git and git://
git.apache.org/hbase.git ? The latter
That is my understanding (Haven't tried committing against
git.apache.org/hbase.git). Just committed this to our pom:
-connectionscm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk
/connection
-developerConnectionscm:svn:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/developerConnection
-
Is github.com/apache/hbase gone forever or was removed just for the
migration and it will be added back later?
Matteo
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
That is my understanding (Haven't tried committing against
git.apache.org/hbase.git). Just committed this to
On the infra ticket Jake said: I've deleted the Github mirror and setup
the git.a.o mirror which Github will pickup within 24 hours.
Also, when I pulled from git-wip-us into a repo cloned earlier from
git.apache.org / github.com/apache/hbase, it brought down 20K+ objects, so
the migration was a
Typing too fast this morning. 200K+
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.orgwrote:
On the infra ticket Jake said: I've deleted the Github mirror and setup
the git.a.o mirror which Github will pickup within 24 hours.
Also, when I pulled from git-wip-us into a repo
Thanks guys for checking.
Can we at least agree on always using something like the following flow for
checking in for now:
- Commit the patch to trunk.
- Try to cherry-pick the patch to 0.98 / 0.96 if possible
- If not, manually commit the patch to the branch.
If the patch is applicable to
There was a migration going on from svn to git for the canonical repo. You
can find more info on the other threads at dev@.
Enis
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Bharath Vissapragada bhara...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Hey,
It works for me. Alternatively you can try from
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.orgwrote:
... I also believe we should rewrite history only in rare cases.
Agreed.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
crew). On feature branches, lets see. Squash if messy history
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-0?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-0.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Committed to 0.94. Thanks Gabriel.
Ability
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks guys for checking.
Can we at least agree on always using something like the following flow for
checking in for now:
- Commit the patch to trunk.
- Try to cherry-pick the patch to 0.98 / 0.96 if possible
- If
What Enis said.
Github mirror should be back in a while.
It is not possible to go against apache git:
http://hbase.apache.org/source-repository.html
St.Ack
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
There was a migration going on from svn to git for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-10507.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.98.4)
(was:
+1 from me too, this is how I would be doing it locally anyhow...
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks guys for checking.
Can we at least agree on always using something like the
Sounds good to me.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks guys for checking.
Can we at least agree on always using something like the following flow for
checking in for now:
- Commit the patch to trunk.
- Try to cherry-pick the patch to 0.98 / 0.96
Hi All,
I was looking at Compression.java and I noticed that for Snappy and LZO
compression it is using ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader() to retrieve the
class file.
LZ4 compression is using this built in function
private static ClassLoader getClassLoaderForCodec() {
ClassLoader cl =
Todd,
I’m saying that you’re raising a straw man.
Now correct me if I’m wrong… but coprocessor code is split in to two camps. One
is System coprocessors which are defined in the hbase-site.xml, right?
What do you call the other group of coprocessor code?
(Sorry my memory is going. Killed too
Dima Spivak created HBASE-11237:
---
Summary: Bulk load initiated by user other than hbase fails
Key: HBASE-11237
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11237
Project: HBase
Issue Type:
I'm pleased to announce that Apache Phoenix has graduated from the
incubator to become a top level project. Thanks so much for all your help
and support - we couldn't have done it without the fantastic HBase
community! We're looking forward to continued collaboration.
Regards,
The Apache Phoenix
Congratulations.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:46 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.orgwrote:
I'm pleased to announce that Apache Phoenix has graduated from the
incubator to become a top level project. Thanks so much for all your help
and support - we couldn't have done it without the
Oh, nice!!!
Congratulations to all the Phoenix team!!!
JM
Le 2014-05-22 17:46, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org a écrit :
I'm pleased to announce that Apache Phoenix has graduated from the
incubator to become a top level project. Thanks so much for all your help
and support - we couldn't
... if I can work out the git process.
-- Lars
Branch field should specify branch.
Please take a look at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10195900/jenkins-git-plugin-how-to-build-specific-tag
Cheers
On May 22, 2014, at 9:57 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
Looks like git is getting in the way of productivity again...
I added to the refguide here:
http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#git.patch.flow
Also updated our build box references so point to git instead of svn.
St.Ack
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks guys for checking.
Can we at least agree on always using
Would you like me to run iterations of the 0.94 unit test suite on a test rig
in lieu of Jenkins ?
On May 22, 2014, at 9:57 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
Looks like git is getting in the way of productivity again...
Does anybody know how to do a jenkins build against a
43 matches
Mail list logo
