Not sure whether there already had similar discussion on it, sorry for
re-raising if yes.
1. data inconsistency between master and peer clusters:
a). write a keyvalue KV1 at a specific coordinate (row, cf, col, ts) with
value V1 to master cluster A, and since there is active scanner while
Liu Shaohui created HBASE-11255:
---
Summary: Negative request num in region load
Key: HBASE-11255
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11255
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Yu resolved HBASE-11234.
Resolution: Fixed
FastDiffDeltaEncoder#getFirstKeyInBlock returns wrong result
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan created HBASE-11256:
--
Summary: [Visibility Controller] Enhance
IntegrationTestWithCellVisibilityLoadAndVerify to verify delete behaviour
Key: HBASE-11256
URL:
+1
Downloaded, checked hash, checked doc.
Loaded data into standaalone mode. Checked it made it. Checked UI. All
seems fine.
Put it up on my little test cluster and ran my blockcache loadings (I had
to copy in hadoop 2.4.x libs). It started fine over data written by trunk.
Seems fine. No
Gaurav Menghani created HBASE-11257:
---
Summary: [0.89-fb] Remove the timestamp from the annotation of Put
Key: HBASE-11257
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11257
Project: HBase
Unification of mvcc and seqId would pave way for solving such
inconsistencies.
See HBASE-8763
Cheers
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:16 AM, 冯宏华 fenghong...@xiaomi.com wrote:
Not sure whether there already had similar discussion on it, sorry for
re-raising if yes.
1. data inconsistency between
Downloaded, checked signature, poked around with a mini-cluster + shell, ui
looks good, built against phoenix.
+1
---
Jesse Yates
@jesse_yates
jyates.github.com
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Anoop John anoop.hb...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Downloaded, checked signature, ran
Yes, that's one of HBASE-8763 intention. The issues could happen when
region moves and we bump up memstore readpoint which would cause the
scanner returns inconsistent data as well.
One solution is that we could keep mvcc number around but it can't cover
all cases such as in replication data
Hi, all
We are planning to upgrade HBase 0.94.6/Hadoop2.0 to either 0.96.2/Hadoop2.4 or
to 0.98.2/Hadoop2.4.
But I have a concern ... The 'stable' is still 0.94.19? Does it mean that both
0.96. and 0.98 are not recommended for
production yet? And which one should we take 0.96 or 0.98? I know
+1
Checked hash.
Layout looks good (did we mean to get rid of the security folder?)
Docs look good.
Simple PE tests on standalone seem to do the right thing.
St.Ack
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:35 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
Just to make you folks work over the long
Isn’t HDP 2.1 shipping 0.98.x ?
On May 27, 2014, at 8:36 PM, Vladimir Rodionov vrodio...@carrieriq.com wrote:
Hi, all
We are planning to upgrade HBase 0.94.6/Hadoop2.0 to either 0.96.2/Hadoop2.4
or to 0.98.2/Hadoop2.4.
But I have a concern ... The 'stable' is still 0.94.19? Does it mean
And so is CDH5.0.1.
Vladimir, I will say go with 0.98 instead of 0.96 since 0.98 will get more
fixes/features. But test your applications with it first.
JM
2014-05-27 16:10 GMT-04:00 Michael Segel michael_se...@hotmail.com:
Isn’t HDP 2.1 shipping 0.98.x ?
On May 27, 2014, at 8:36 PM,
I tried the test suite 3 times and 3 times failed on this:
Results :
Failed tests:
testCacheOnWriteEvictOnClose(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestStoreFile)
Tests in error:
testScannerSelection[0](org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.TestScannerSelectionUsingKeyRange)
Elliott Clark created HBASE-11258:
-
Summary: [0.89-fb] Pull in Integration Tests from open source
0.96/trunk
Key: HBASE-11258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11258
Project: HBase
These tests passed locally (on MacBook).
Cheers
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
jean-m...@spaggiari.org wrote:
I tried the test suite 3 times and 3 times failed on this:
Results :
Failed tests:
Inlined.
2014-05-27 16:10 GMT-04:00 Michael Segel michael_se...@hotmail.com:
Isn’t HDP 2.1 shipping 0.98.x ?
Yes.
One more question: future upgrade from 0.96 - 1.0 and 0.98 - 1.0?
Rolling or not?
0.96 - 1.0 probably won't be supported unless there is explicit interest
and work for
The 'stable' is still 0.94.19?
Lets fix this. 0.98.3 becomes new 'stable'?
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote:
Inlined.
...
One more question: future upgrade from 0.96 - 1.0 and 0.98 - 1.0?
Rolling or not?
0.96 - 1.0 probably won't be supported
Enis,
for customer already on 0.96, can they rolling restart to 0.98, and then
from 0.98 rolling to 1.0?
Demai
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote:
Inlined.
2014-05-27 16:10 GMT-04:00 Michael Segel michael_se...@hotmail.com:
Isn’t HDP 2.1 shipping
Thanks Stack. The security folder is still there on purpose. I just changed the
pom to always pull the secure files into the build (not just for the secure
target).
-- Lars
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: HBase Dev List dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Demai Ni nid...@gmail.com wrote:
Enis,
for customer already on 0.96, can they rolling restart to 0.98, and then
from 0.98 rolling to 1.0?
I think that should work.
Agree that
Enoch Hsu created HBASE-11259:
-
Summary: Compression.java different compressions load system
classpath differently causing errors
Key: HBASE-11259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11259
Stack and Enis,
thanks. We may eventually come out a way to get customers directly from
0.96 to 1.0, although probably just wrap two-rolling-start (96-98,
98-1.0) into one command. will report back if it works.
Demai
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Tue, May
Thanks, everyone
I think we will go with 0.98.2
-Vladimir
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Demai Ni nid...@gmail.com wrote:
Stack and Enis,
thanks. We may eventually come out a way to get customers directly from
0.96 to 1.0, although probably just wrap two-rolling-start (96-98,
98-1.0)
Ted Yu created HBASE-11260:
--
Summary: hbase-default.xml refers to
hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.upperLimit which is deprecated
Key: HBASE-11260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11260
Agreed with Devaraj. I do not think that these changes will destabilize the
code base much. All of the code committed to branch has been unit tested
and integration tests, both specific to region replicas and others have
been running for some time.
Specifically, various large scale data ingestion
I ran the unit test suite 25 times on JDK 7 and did not see this. I am
currently doing the same on JDK 6. No unit test failures so far.
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
jean-m...@spaggiari.org wrote:
I tried the test suite 3 times and 3 times failed on this:
Results :
Devaraj Das created HBASE-11261:
---
Summary: Handle splitting of regions that have region_replication
greater than one
Key: HBASE-11261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11261
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Misty Stanley-Jones resolved HBASE-11250.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Document: CLONE - Fix jersey serialization/deserialization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Misty Stanley-Jones resolved HBASE-6139.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Centos 6.2 is very very old now. I don't think this info is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Misty Stanley-Jones resolved HBASE-9729.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Assignee: Misty Stanley-Jones
I can't reproduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Misty Stanley-Jones resolved HBASE-8100.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
This seems to have been fixed some time since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-3696.
--
Resolution: Implemented
Resolving as implemented by HBASE-11218 (which should go in soon) at least for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Misty Stanley-Jones resolved HBASE-6575.
Resolution: Fixed
Add SPM for HBase to Ref Guide
--
34 matches
Mail list logo
