[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15588) Use nonce for checkAndMutate operation

Jianwei Cui created HBASE-15588: --- Summary: Use nonce for checkAndMutate operation Key: HBASE-15588 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15588 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-15404) PE: Clients in append and increment are operating serially

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy resolved HBASE-15404. -- Resolution: Invalid Clients are still working parallely, except that they all process keys from a same small

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15587) FSTableDescriptors.getDescriptor() logs stack trace erronously

Enis Soztutar created HBASE-15587: - Summary: FSTableDescriptors.getDescriptor() logs stack trace erronously Key: HBASE-15587 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15587 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15586) Unify human readable numbers in the web UI

Enis Soztutar created HBASE-15586: - Summary: Unify human readable numbers in the web UI Key: HBASE-15586 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15586 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15585) RegionServer coprocessors are not flexible enough

Sergey Shelukhin created HBASE-15585: Summary: RegionServer coprocessors are not flexible enough Key: HBASE-15585 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15585 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15584) Revisit handling of BackupState#CANCELLED

Ted Yu created HBASE-15584: -- Summary: Revisit handling of BackupState#CANCELLED Key: HBASE-15584 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15584 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15583) Discuss mutable vs immutable HTableDescriptor

Gabor Liptak created HBASE-15583: Summary: Discuss mutable vs immutable HTableDescriptor Key: HBASE-15583 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15583 Project: HBase Issue Type:

Re: Better management of flakies

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Maybe better if we ensure everything needed to run our jobs is scripts > in dev-support so that the commiter-only change can just be moving > jenkins to execute them. > > I like this idea Sean. St.Ack > On Fri,

Re: Better management of flakies

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Matteo Bertozzi wrote: > don't we have already a flakey detector? HBASE-8018 > > https://github.com/apache/hbase/commit/4dc52261a19ed1055b837b136c97ea36e362ba6e > > I remember that script. It used to work for me but had forgotten about

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15582) SnapshotManifestV1 too verbose when there are no regions

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-15582: --- Summary: SnapshotManifestV1 too verbose when there are no regions Key: HBASE-15582 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15582 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15581) Reduce garbage created by PB in write path

Anoop Sam John created HBASE-15581: -- Summary: Reduce garbage created by PB in write path Key: HBASE-15581 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15581 Project: HBase Issue Type:

Re: Better management of flakies

If you create a jira that describes what we need to implement, I'll find time to put in changes. Maybe better if we ensure everything needed to run our jobs is scripts in dev-support so that the commiter-only change can just be moving jenkins to execute them. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM,

Re: Better management of flakies

So who's setting up the jobs? I don't have perms to do it. On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Apekshit Sharma wrote: > So tackling the two parts individually: > 1) Detection : A good automatic flaky detector will no doubt save manual > effort. The one mentioned by Matteo seems

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-12814) Zero downtime upgrade from 94 to 98

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] churro morales resolved HBASE-12814. Resolution: Not A Problem Most likely everyone is off the 94 branch. > Zero downtime

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15580) Tag coprocessor limitedprivate scope to StoreFile.Reader

Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla created HBASE-15580: --- Summary: Tag coprocessor limitedprivate scope to StoreFile.Reader Key: HBASE-15580 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15580

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15579) Remove synchronized around nonce in Procedure submit

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-15579: --- Summary: Remove synchronized around nonce in Procedure submit Key: HBASE-15579 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15579 Project: HBase

Successful: HBase Generate Website

Build status: Successful If successful, the website and docs have been generated. If failed, skip to the bottom of this email. Use the following commands to download the patch and apply it to a clean branch based on origin/asf-site. If you prefer to keep the hbase-site repo around

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15578) Handle HBASE-15234 for ReplicationHFileCleaner

Ashish Singhi created HBASE-15578: - Summary: Handle HBASE-15234 for ReplicationHFileCleaner Key: HBASE-15578 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15578 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15577) there need be a mechanism to enable ZK's ACL check when the authentication strategy is simple

chenxu created HBASE-15577: -- Summary: there need be a mechanism to enable ZK's ACL check when the authentication strategy is simple Key: HBASE-15577 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15577

Re: Coprocessors causes data access delay?

Can you provide us the code u have written for the pre hooks + the custom filter code. You sure the filter is not filtering out this recent cell? Add some logs there and check? -Anoop- On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Jozef Vilcek wrote: > Test was done via hbase shell

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15576) Support stateless scanning and scanning cursor

Phil Yang created HBASE-15576: - Summary: Support stateless scanning and scanning cursor Key: HBASE-15576 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15576 Project: HBase Issue Type: New