Re: release of HBase 1.3.1?

2017-04-03 Thread Mikhail Antonov
Thanks Dima! That definitely would be handy. -Mikhail On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Dima Spivak wrote: > I can help with running the API compatibility tooling. It's the least I can > do since I no longer have access to the computing resources I used to rely > upon for

Re: release of HBase 1.3.1?

2017-04-03 Thread Dima Spivak
I can help with running the API compatibility tooling. It's the least I can do since I no longer have access to the computing resources I used to rely upon for testing releases. Just ping me when you need a hand, Mikhail. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:35 PM Mikhail Antonov

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-17868) Backport HBASE-10205 to branch-1.3

2017-04-03 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan resolved HBASE-17868. Resolution: Duplicate Dup of HBASE-HBASE-15691. > Backport HBASE-10205 to

Re: release of HBase 1.3.1?

2017-04-03 Thread Mikhail Antonov
Hi, I've been planning to cut an RC for 1.3.1 for some time, apologize for the delay here. I'm going to go over outstanding jiras tomorrow, I think there are still few issues waiting for backports. Andrew - appreciate your offer! I have started preparations for 1.3.1 release, but any help with

Re: release of HBase 1.3.1?

2017-04-03 Thread Andrew Purtell
I'd be happy to RM 1.3.1 unless someone already has it waiting in the wings. > On Apr 3, 2017, at 5:43 PM, James Taylor wrote: > > Hello, > We'd like to start supporting releases of Phoenix that work with the HBase > 1.3 branch, but there's a committed fix on which we

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17871) scan#setBatch(int) call leads wrong result of VerifyReplication

2017-04-03 Thread Tomu Tsuruhara (JIRA)
Tomu Tsuruhara created HBASE-17871: -- Summary: scan#setBatch(int) call leads wrong result of VerifyReplication Key: HBASE-17871 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17871 Project: HBase

Re: release of HBase 1.3.1?

2017-04-03 Thread York, Zach
+1 I meant to send this a while ago. On 4/3/17, 5:43 PM, "James Taylor" wrote: Hello, We'd like to start supporting releases of Phoenix that work with the HBase 1.3 branch, but there's a committed fix on which we rely (HBASE-17587) for Phoenix to

release of HBase 1.3.1?

2017-04-03 Thread James Taylor
Hello, We'd like to start supporting releases of Phoenix that work with the HBase 1.3 branch, but there's a committed fix on which we rely (HBASE-17587) for Phoenix to function correctly. Is there a time frame for an HBase 1.3.1 release? Thanks, James

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17870) Backport HBASE-12770 to branch-1.3

2017-04-03 Thread Ashu Pachauri (JIRA)
Ashu Pachauri created HBASE-17870: - Summary: Backport HBASE-12770 to branch-1.3 Key: HBASE-17870 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17870 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement

Comments on HBase Architecture Document

2017-04-03 Thread 杨苏立 Yang Su Li
Hi HBase Developers, The previous email I sent seem to spur more conversion on the durability of HBase rather than its overall architecture; so I think i would send another email to plead comments on our architectural document ( http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~suli/hbase.pdf) . We are doing some

Re: hbase does not seem to handle mixed workloads well

2017-04-03 Thread Stack
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:29 PM, 杨苏立 Yang Su Li wrote: > Hi, > > We found that when there is a mix of CPU-intensive and I/O intensive > workload, HBase seems to slow everything down to the disk throughput level. > > This is shown in the performance graph at >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17869) UnsafeAvailChecker wrongly returns false on ppc

2017-04-03 Thread Jerry He (JIRA)
Jerry He created HBASE-17869: Summary: UnsafeAvailChecker wrongly returns false on ppc Key: HBASE-17869 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17869 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

Re: How threads interact with each other in HBase

2017-04-03 Thread Josh Elser
Yes, you are correct that there is an edge condition here when there is abrupt power-failure to a node. HDFS guards against most of this as there are multiple copies of your data spread across racks. However, if you have abrupt power failure across multiple racks (or your entire hardware),

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17868) Backport HBASE-10205 to branch-1.3

2017-04-03 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan created HBASE-17868: -- Summary: Backport HBASE-10205 to branch-1.3 Key: HBASE-17868 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17868 Project: HBase Issue