[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-16575) unify the semantic of RRCI#callWithRetries and RRCI#callWithoutRetries when the maxAttempts is configured to one

2017-04-06 Thread Chia-Ping Tsai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chia-Ping Tsai resolved HBASE-16575. Resolution: Not A Problem > unify the semantic of RRCI#callWithRetries and

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-10145) Table creation should proceed in the presence of a stale znode

2017-04-06 Thread Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-10145. --- Resolution: Won't Fix Closing old issue. > Table creation should proceed in the presence of

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-10028) Cleanup metrics documentation

2017-04-06 Thread Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-10028. --- Resolution: Won't Fix Closing old issue. > Cleanup metrics documentation >

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-6492) Remove Reflection based Hadoop abstractions

2017-04-06 Thread Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-6492. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Closing old issue. > Remove Reflection based Hadoop abstractions >

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-5475) Allow importtsv and Import to work truly offline when using bulk import option

2017-04-06 Thread Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-5475. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Closing old issue. > Allow importtsv and Import to work truly offline

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-5311) Allow inmemory Memstore compactions

2017-04-06 Thread Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-5311. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Closing old issue. > Allow inmemory Memstore compactions >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17890) FuzzyRow tests fail if unaligned support is false

2017-04-06 Thread Jerry He (JIRA)
Jerry He created HBASE-17890: Summary: FuzzyRow tests fail if unaligned support is false Key: HBASE-17890 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17890 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17889) ResultBoundedCompletionService's cancel() needs to interrupt the working thread and free it to the thread-pool

2017-04-06 Thread huaxiang sun (JIRA)
huaxiang sun created HBASE-17889: Summary: ResultBoundedCompletionService's cancel() needs to interrupt the working thread and free it to the thread-pool Key: HBASE-17889 URL:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17888) Add generic methods for updating metrics on start and end of a procedure execution

2017-04-06 Thread Umesh Agashe (JIRA)
Umesh Agashe created HBASE-17888: Summary: Add generic methods for updating metrics on start and end of a procedure execution Key: HBASE-17888 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17888

Re: release of HBase 1.3.1?

2017-04-06 Thread Andrew Purtell
Getting RC0 out there shook loose a couple of things, on to RC1 and a release soon, thanks! On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:41 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Thanks, Mikhail, Andrew and the rest of the team! Really appreciate it. > > James > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:39 PM,

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available

2017-04-06 Thread Andrew Purtell
No objections. Looks like Phoenix will be good. They will use the strings directly (for a while) On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Mikhail Antonov wrote: > Thanks Yu Li, > > I think with that finding we can strike RC0 down and I'll roll RC1. > > Objections? > > -Mikhail > >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available

2017-04-06 Thread Mikhail Antonov
Thanks Yu Li, I think with that finding we can strike RC0 down and I'll roll RC1. Objections? -Mikhail On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Yu Li wrote: > Thanks all for the input, I've just committed HBASE-17886 into master and > branch-1.3. > > For branch-1.2 the commit

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17887) TestAcidGuarantees fails frequently

2017-04-06 Thread Umesh Agashe (JIRA)
Umesh Agashe created HBASE-17887: Summary: TestAcidGuarantees fails frequently Key: HBASE-17887 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17887 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

Failure: HBase Generate Website

2017-04-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build status: Failure If successful, the website and docs have been generated and the site has been updated automatically. If you're getting this email, it probably failed and you may need to update the site manually if you can't get Jenkins fixed. If failed, see

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available

2017-04-06 Thread Yu Li
Thanks all for the input, I've just committed HBASE-17886 into master and branch-1.3. For branch-1.2 the commit suspends and will wait for Sean's response. Best Regards, Yu On 6 April 2017 at 16:50, Mikhail Antonov wrote: > My bad on not checking compatibility report

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available

2017-04-06 Thread Mikhail Antonov
My bad on not checking compatibility report here. I think leaving unified metric names in place is conceptually right thing to do, with having old names as proxies, so I'd be +1 on v2 patch to HBASE-17886. Then we can strike down rc0 and immediately roll rc1. Regarding 1.2.5.1, it's up to Sean

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-17882) Why do the WalEdit implement the Writable interface

2017-04-06 Thread Chia-Ping Tsai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chia-Ping Tsai resolved HBASE-17882. Resolution: Duplicate > Why do the WalEdit implement the Writable interface >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available

2017-04-06 Thread Stack
I committed that patch. It was for phoenix folks. In review I misjudged the public statics in ServerSideScanMetrics as for internal only. My mistake. Agree that it a compat breaker. Sorry for making more work. I put a question up on the phoenix dev list asking if they depend on this being in a

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available

2017-04-06 Thread Duo Zhang
Let's do a 1.2.5.1 release? 2017-04-06 15:25 GMT+08:00 Yu Li : > I have attached the screenshot of the report onto HBASE-17886, FYI boss > @Mikhail > > I think this is also an issue for branch-1.2 although 1.2.5 is already > released, and supporting both names and (add-back

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available

2017-04-06 Thread Yu Li
I have attached the screenshot of the report onto HBASE-17886, FYI boss @Mikhail I think this is also an issue for branch-1.2 although 1.2.5 is already released, and supporting both names and (add-back and) mark the old one deprecated as per Duo suggested in 17886 might be a good idea? Best

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available

2017-04-06 Thread Mikhail Antonov
Hmm. Looks like this change has already went out in 1.2.5 though, looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12338339=12310753 Those the compat report posted there on the RC is no longer available (we can re-run it). Should we revert it in 1.2.6 back then, or leave

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available

2017-04-06 Thread Mikhail Antonov
Thanks Yu Li! You picture doesn't load for me, could you repost? I'll run compatibility checker too. -Mikhail On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Yu Li wrote: > -1 (non-binding) > > Checked sums and signatures: ok > Built from source: ok (7u79) > RAT check passed: ok (7u79) >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available

2017-04-06 Thread Yu Li
-1 (non-binding) Checked sums and signatures: ok Built from source: ok (7u79) RAT check passed: ok (7u79) Compatibility check: Failed ​ Checked the commit history and the above issue is introduced by HBASE-17716, and have opened HBASE-17886 to fix it. Best Regards, Yu On 6 April 2017 at

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17886) HBASE-17716 breaks compatibility of ServerSideScanMetrics

2017-04-06 Thread Yu Li (JIRA)
Yu Li created HBASE-17886: - Summary: HBASE-17716 breaks compatibility of ServerSideScanMetrics Key: HBASE-17886 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17886 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug