[jira] [Created] (HBASE-25309) Support start/stop replication server by scripts

2020-11-19 Thread Sun Xin (Jira)
Sun Xin created HBASE-25309: --- Summary: Support start/stop replication server by scripts Key: HBASE-25309 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25309 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-25127) Enhance PerformanceEvaluation to profile meta replica performance.

2020-11-19 Thread Michael Stack (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Stack reopened HBASE-25127: --- [~clarax98007] I'm reopening this. I made a mistake when I committed it. I added [~zhangduo] 

DISCUSS: Remove hbase-backup from master?

2020-11-19 Thread Stack
It strikes me as work that has been abandoned with no supporting developer. It has had no improvement and few commits other than adjustment because a backing dependency has changed since original contribution. It has not been included in a release so has no users as yet. Does anyone use it or want

Re: HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2

2020-11-19 Thread Stack
The VOTE on the adjacent thread has passed. Will rebase and rerun the hadoopqa check to be sure all is good, and then merge the current unaltered state of branch HBASE-18070 to the master branch (this afternoon if all goes well). I will then work on doing the same for branch-2 merging

[RESULT] VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" t

2020-11-19 Thread Stack
With 5 binding and 1 non-binding votes in favor and no votes against, this vote to merge passes. Thanks to all who participated. S On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 8:43 AM Stack wrote: > Please VOTE on whether to merge HBASE-18070 feature branch to master (and > HBASE-18070.branch-2 to branch-2). The

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-25308) [branch-1] Consume Guava from hbase-thirdparty hbase-shaded-miscellaneous

2020-11-19 Thread Andrew Kyle Purtell (Jira)
Andrew Kyle Purtell created HBASE-25308: --- Summary: [branch-1] Consume Guava from hbase-thirdparty hbase-shaded-miscellaneous Key: HBASE-25308 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25308

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-19 Thread Huaxiang Sun
Thank you all for the vote! Let me follow up on HBASE-25284. Best Regards, Huaxiang On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 9:05 AM Andrew Purtell wrote: > Thank you for providing actionable feedback Duo. > > I also thank you personally for adjusting your vote, as it unblocks > everyone here. > > > > On Thu,

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-25306) The log in SimpleLoadBalancer#onConfigurationChange is wrong

2020-11-19 Thread Viraj Jasani (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viraj Jasani resolved HBASE-25306. -- Fix Version/s: 2.3.4 2.2.7 2.4.0

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-19 Thread Andrew Purtell
Thank you for providing actionable feedback Duo. I also thank you personally for adjusting your vote, as it unblocks everyone here. On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:53 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > Oh, just noticed that the design doc has been committed to master and > branch-2 directly. I'm not sure

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-19 Thread Stack
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:53 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > Oh, just noticed that the design doc has been committed to master and > branch-2 directly. I'm not sure if this is the correct way but since it is > already like this, let's just fix it on master and branch-2. > > Then there is no blocker

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-25307) ThreadLocal pooling leads to NullPointerException

2020-11-19 Thread Balazs Meszaros (Jira)
Balazs Meszaros created HBASE-25307: --- Summary: ThreadLocal pooling leads to NullPointerException Key: HBASE-25307 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25307 Project: HBase

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-25300) 'Unknown table hbase:quota' happens when desc table in shell if quota disabled

2020-11-19 Thread Guanghao Zhang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang resolved HBASE-25300. Fix Version/s: 2.3.4 2.2.7 2.4.0 Resolution:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-25306) The log in SimpleLoadBalancer#onConfigurationChange is wrong

2020-11-19 Thread Baiqiang Zhao (Jira)
Baiqiang Zhao created HBASE-25306: - Summary: The log in SimpleLoadBalancer#onConfigurationChange is wrong Key: HBASE-25306 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25306 Project: HBase

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-19 Thread Duo Zhang
Oh, just noticed that the design doc has been committed to master and branch-2 directly. I'm not sure if this is the correct way but since it is already like this, let's just fix it on master and branch-2. Then there is no blocker on the merge of the feature branch any more. Change my vote to +1.

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-25284) Check-in "Enable memstore replication..." design

2020-11-19 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang reopened HBASE-25284: --- Reopen to update the design doc to explicitly mention that HedgeRead mode can not increase the