Re: [DISCUSS] Move the stable pointer to 2.3.x and EOM for branch-2.2?

2020-12-15 Thread Bharath Vissapragada
Good idea +1. On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:43 PM Huaxiang Sun wrote: > +1 (non-binding). > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:14 PM Viraj Jasani wrote: > > > I believe last time when we discussed this, we were considering stability > > of migration from MasterProcWAL to MasterProc directory (WAL to

Re: [DISCUSS] Move the stable pointer to 2.3.x and EOM for branch-2.2?

2020-12-15 Thread Huaxiang Sun
+1 (non-binding). On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:14 PM Viraj Jasani wrote: > I believe last time when we discussed this, we were considering stability > of migration from MasterProcWAL to MasterProc directory (WAL to region > based procedure store) during rolling upgrade from 2.2.x to 2.3.x. I hope

Re: [DISCUSS] Move the stable pointer to 2.3.x and EOM for branch-2.2?

2020-12-15 Thread Viraj Jasani
I believe last time when we discussed this, we were considering stability of migration from MasterProcWAL to MasterProc directory (WAL to region based procedure store) during rolling upgrade from 2.2.x to 2.3.x. I hope we are good with this. On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 10:27 AM, Viraj Jasani wrote:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-25400) [Flakey Tests] branch-2 TestRegionMoveAndAbandon

2020-12-15 Thread Michael Stack (Jira)
Michael Stack created HBASE-25400: - Summary: [Flakey Tests] branch-2 TestRegionMoveAndAbandon Key: HBASE-25400 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25400 Project: HBase Issue

Re: [DISCUSS] Move the stable pointer to 2.3.x and EOM for branch-2.2?

2020-12-15 Thread Geoffrey Jacoby
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:23 PM Nick Dimiduk wrote: > Good plan, +1 ! > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 17:08 Guanghao Zhang wrote: > > > Hi folks! > > > > Now we cut new branch-2.4 and the 2.4.0 will be released. We can EOM for > > branch-2.2 to reduce the maintenance work.

Re: Time for 2.3.4

2020-12-15 Thread Nick Dimiduk
Thank you Huaxiang ! On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 15:09 Huaxiang Sun wrote: > Continue this topic. I volunteered to be RM for 2.3.4. I plan to warm up > this release process starting from tomorrow. Per Nick said 2 weeks ago, if > there are any patch-level bug fixes you want to include in 2.3.4,

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-25365) The log in move_servers_rsgroup is incorrect

2020-12-15 Thread Michael Stack (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Stack resolved HBASE-25365. --- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0-alpha-1 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Resolution: Fixed Merged to

Re: [DISCUSS] Move the stable pointer to 2.3.x and EOM for branch-2.2?

2020-12-15 Thread Nick Dimiduk
Good plan, +1 ! On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 17:08 Guanghao Zhang wrote: > Hi folks! > > Now we cut new branch-2.4 and the 2.4.0 will be released. We can EOM for > branch-2.2 to reduce the maintenance work. Meanwhile, I thought branch-2.3 > is more stable than branch-2.2 because you guys take great

Re: [DISCUSS] Move the stable pointer to 2.3.x and EOM for branch-2.2?

2020-12-15 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 > On Dec 15, 2020, at 5:41 PM, Stack wrote: > > +1 > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:08 PM Guanghao Zhang wrote: >> >> Hi folks! >> >> Now we cut new branch-2.4 and the 2.4.0 will be released. We can EOM for >> branch-2.2 to reduce the maintenance work. Meanwhile, I thought branch-2.3 >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Move the stable pointer to 2.3.x and EOM for branch-2.2?

2020-12-15 Thread Stack
+1 On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:08 PM Guanghao Zhang wrote: > Hi folks! > > Now we cut new branch-2.4 and the 2.4.0 will be released. We can EOM for > branch-2.2 to reduce the maintenance work. Meanwhile, I thought branch-2.3 > is more stable than branch-2.2 because you guys take great test work

Re: [DISCUSS] Move the stable pointer to 2.3.x and EOM for branch-2.2?

2020-12-15 Thread Duo Zhang
+1 Guanghao Zhang 于2020年12月16日周三 上午9:08写道: > Hi folks! > > Now we cut new branch-2.4 and the 2.4.0 will be released. We can EOM for > branch-2.2 to reduce the maintenance work. Meanwhile, I thought branch-2.3 > is more stable than branch-2.2 because you guys take great test work when > release

[DISCUSS] Move the stable pointer to 2.3.x and EOM for branch-2.2?

2020-12-15 Thread Guanghao Zhang
Hi folks! Now we cut new branch-2.4 and the 2.4.0 will be released. We can EOM for branch-2.2 to reduce the maintenance work. Meanwhile, I thought branch-2.3 is more stable than branch-2.2 because you guys take great test work when release 2.3.0. And for branch-2.2, the 2.2.7 may be the last of

Re: Time for 2.3.4

2020-12-15 Thread Huaxiang Sun
Continue this topic. I volunteered to be RM for 2.3.4. I plan to warm up this release process starting from tomorrow. Per Nick said 2 weeks ago, if there are any patch-level bug fixes you want to include in 2.3.4, please wrap them up in couple of days. Thanks, Huaxiang On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.4.0 (RC1) is available

2020-12-15 Thread Nick Dimiduk
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:26 AM Andrew Purtell wrote: > With six (6) binding +1 votes including my own, and one (1) nonbinding +1 > vote, and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote passes. > > Thanks to all who voted on the release candidate. >  Thank you for taking this on, Andrew! On Thu, Dec 3,

[RESULT] [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 2.4.0 (RC1) is available

2020-12-15 Thread Andrew Purtell
With six (6) binding +1 votes including my own, and one (1) nonbinding +1 vote, and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote passes. Thanks to all who voted on the release candidate. On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:04 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > Please vote on this Apache hbase release candidate, hbase-2.4.0RC1 >

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-25389) [Flakey Tests] branch-2 TestMetaShutdownHandler

2020-12-15 Thread Michael Stack (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Stack resolved HBASE-25389. --- Fix Version/s: 2.4.1 2.5.0 3.0.0-alpha-1 Hadoop