[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-22953) Supporting Hadoop 3.3.0

2021-12-20 Thread Wei-Chiu Chuang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wei-Chiu Chuang resolved HBASE-22953. - Fix Version/s: 2.3.0 3.0.0-alpha-1 Resolution: Fixed >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-26614) Refactor code related to "dump"ing ZK nodes

2021-12-20 Thread Nick Dimiduk (Jira)
Nick Dimiduk created HBASE-26614: Summary: Refactor code related to "dump"ing ZK nodes Key: HBASE-26614 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26614 Project: HBase Issue Type: Task

Re: [VOTE] Second release candidate for hbase-operator-tools 1.2.0 is available for download

2021-12-20 Thread Duo Zhang
+1 binding Since there is only one new commit since RC0, I have just done some simple verification before carrying the +1 from RC0 Checked sigs and sums: Matched Log4j2 2.17.0 in tarball: Confirmed Thanks. Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu 于2021年12月21日周二 01:47写道: > +1 (non-binding) > > *

Re: [VOTE] Merge HBASE-26067 (storefile tracking) into master and branch-2

2021-12-20 Thread Duo Zhang
IIRC for merging a feature branch back, 3 committers' +1 is enough? Peter Somogyi 于2021年12月21日周二 04:07写道: > +1 > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 7:54 PM Josh Elser wrote: > > > Thanks to all who took the time to vote already! > > > > So far, we have 5 +1's (2 binding, 3 non-binding) which is

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-26613) The logic of the method incrementIV in Encryption class has problem

2021-12-20 Thread Yutong Xiao (Jira)
Yutong Xiao created HBASE-26613: --- Summary: The logic of the method incrementIV in Encryption class has problem Key: HBASE-26613 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26613 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-26612) Adjust log level when looking for .filelist/{f1,f2}

2021-12-20 Thread Josh Elser (Jira)
Josh Elser created HBASE-26612: -- Summary: Adjust log level when looking for .filelist/{f1,f2} Key: HBASE-26612 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26612 Project: HBase Issue Type:

Re: [VOTE] Merge HBASE-26067 (storefile tracking) into master and branch-2

2021-12-20 Thread Peter Somogyi
+1 On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 7:54 PM Josh Elser wrote: > Thanks to all who took the time to vote already! > > So far, we have 5 +1's (2 binding, 3 non-binding) which is sufficient > for a lazy-consensus RESULT. However, I'd love to see a vote from > someone who didn't contribute code to this

re: [VOTE] Merge HBASE-26067 (storefile tracking) into master and branch-2

2021-12-20 Thread Josh Elser
Thanks to all who took the time to vote already! So far, we have 5 +1's (2 binding, 3 non-binding) which is sufficient for a lazy-consensus RESULT. However, I'd love to see a vote from someone who didn't contribute code to this feature. I know running an in-depth technical analysis is a major

Re: [VOTE] Second release candidate for hbase-operator-tools 1.2.0 is available for download

2021-12-20 Thread Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu
+1 (non-binding) * Signature: ok * Checksum : ok * Rat check (1.8.0_292): ok - mvn clean apache-rat:check * Built from source (1.8.0_292): ok - mvn clean install -DskipTests * Unit tests pass (1.8.0_292): ok - mvn package