+1
* Signature: ok
* Checksum : ok
* Rat check (1.8.0_362): ok
- mvn clean apache-rat:check
* Built from source (1.8.0_362): ok
- mvn clean install -DskipTests
* Unit tests pass (1.8.0_362): ok
- mvn clean package -P
+1
* Signature: ok
* Checksum : ok
* Rat check (1.8.0_292): ok
- mvn clean apache-rat:check
* Built from source (1.8.0_292): ok
- mvn clean install -DskipTests
* Unit tests pass (1.8.0_292): ok
- mvn package -P runSmallTests
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:25 PM subrat mishra
wrote:
> +1
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-28155.
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.6.0)
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Resolution: Fixed
Pushed to
+1
* Signature: ok * Checksum : ok * Rat check (1.8.0_291): ok -
mvn clean apache-rat:check * Built from source (1.8.0_291): ok - mvn
clean install -DskipTests * Unit tests pass (1.8.0_291): ok - mvn
package -P runSmallTests
On Friday, 20 October, 2023
Just send a notice to the dev mailing list, and then use the normal
git way to create a new branch called branch-2.6 from branch-2, push
it to github, done :)
Bryan Beaudreault 于2023年10月20日周五 07:53写道：
>
> I can give it a shot :)
>
> I’ve started looking at the release docs, but don’t see any
Wellington Chevreuil created HBASE-28170:
Summary: Put the cached time at the beginning of the block run
cache validation in the background when retrieving the persistent cache
Key: HBASE-28170
URL:
I can give it a shot :)
I’ve started looking at the release docs, but don’t see any info on how to
create a new release branch. Is there a process for that?
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:55 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> I second this nomination!
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 6:39 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Manning resolved HBASE-25222.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
> Add a cost function to move the daughter regions of a recent split
+1 binding
* Signature: ok
* Checksum : ok
* Rat check (1.8.0_275): ok
- mvn clean apache-rat:check
* Built from source (1.8.0_275): ok
- mvn clean install -DskipTests
* Unit tests pass (1.8.0_275): ok
- mvn package -P
I second this nomination!
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 6:39 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> OK, good. So we are good to go I think.
> And we need a release manager for 2.6.x, do you have any interest in
> being a release manager for 2.6.x? :)
>
> Bryan Beaudreault 于2023年10月19日周四 21:22写道：
> >
> > Hello.
This plan sounds good to me.
>From the earlier message, we should be okay to upgrade branch-2.5 as well,
though I wonder if we can ErrorProne the new API methods.
Thanks,
Nick
On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 02:55, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28153.
>
> If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-28113.
---
Fix Version/s: 2.6.0
2.4.18
3.0.0-beta-1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-28169.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Merged to master.
> Bump urllib3 from 1.26.17 to 1.26.18 in
Duo Zhang created HBASE-28169:
-
Summary: Bump urllib3 from 1.26.17 to 1.26.18 in
/dev-support/git-jira-release-audit
Key: HBASE-28169
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28169
Project: HBase
+1 binding
Checked sigs and sums: Matched
LICENSE and NOTICE: In place
Compatibility report: 100% compatible
Built from source(AdoptOpenJDK-11.0.11+9):
mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=3.0
Passed
Run UTs:
mvn -Dsurefire.firstPartForkCount=1C
-Dsurefire.secondPartForkCount=1C
OK, good. So we are good to go I think.
And we need a release manager for 2.6.x, do you have any interest in
being a release manager for 2.6.x? :)
Bryan Beaudreault 于2023年10月19日周四 21:22写道：
>
> Hello. I'm not aware of any major blockers at the moment. In fact we
> recently finished our migration
Hello. I'm not aware of any major blockers at the moment. In fact we
recently finished our migration and are fully using 2.6's TLS in all of our
production.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 12:07 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang)
wrote:
> Hi Bryan, do we still have any blocker issues for cutting branch-2.6
> and
+1 binding
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 31:33 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2023-10-19T00:48:18+01:00
[INFO]
Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28153.
If there are no objections, I will provide a PR there to upgrade the
zookeeper version to 3.8.x on branch-2+.
For branch-2.4, I prefer we just leave it as is because soon it will be EOL.
For branch-2.5, I think it depends on the RM's
19 matches
Mail list logo
