Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

Good idea and +1. Thanks Stephen On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 7:12 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan < ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Gerry Morales > wrote: > > > unsubscribe > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Stack

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

+1 On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Gerry Morales wrote: > unsubscribe > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Stack wrote: > > > Any objection? > > > > jdk7 is dead, EOL'd. > > > > You all good w/ this? > > > > St.Ack > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

unsubscribe On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Stack wrote: > Any objection? > > jdk7 is dead, EOL'd. > > You all good w/ this? > > St.Ack >

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

Thanks all for chiming in. I filed HBASE-15624 Move master branch/hbase-2.0.0 to jdk-8 only to act on the decision made here. St.Ack On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Yu Li wrote: > +1 > > Best Regards, > Yu > > On 9 April 2016 at 02:13, Stack wrote: > > > I

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

+1 Best Regards, Yu On 9 April 2016 at 02:13, Stack wrote: > I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YETUS-369 (though I hate > filing stuff w/o putting up a patch... maybe I'll get to doing one!) > St.Ack > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Sean Busbey

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YETUS-369 (though I hate filing stuff w/o putting up a patch... maybe I'll get to doing one!) St.Ack On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > I don't think there's an issue yet. > On Apr 8, 2016 00:12, "Stack"

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

+1 -Mikhail On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Esteban Gutierrez wrote: > +1 > > -- > Cloudera, Inc. > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thursday, April 7, 2016, Stack wrote: > > > > > Any

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

+1 -- Cloudera, Inc. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > +1 > > On Thursday, April 7, 2016, Stack wrote: > > > Any objection? > > > > jdk7 is dead, EOL'd. > > > > You all good w/ this? > > > > St.Ack > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

+1 On Thursday, April 7, 2016, Stack wrote: > Any objection? > > jdk7 is dead, EOL'd. > > You all good w/ this? > > St.Ack >

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

I don't think it'll actually speed up tests much. In precommit we only check one jdk for unit tests and in postcommit we do them in parallel. On Apr 8, 2016 03:44, "Elliott Clark" wrote: > As a side benefit, only testing one jdk would seriously speed up test runs. > > +1 > >

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

I don't think there's an issue yet. On Apr 8, 2016 00:12, "Stack" wrote: > Is there a YETUS issue for this Sean or should I file one? > St.Ack > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > we'll need to get a feature into yetus that can

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

+1 on jdk8 only. Bunch of code could be refactored with jdk8's new features, new classes and new methods. For example, most 'get->putIfAbsent->checkAndCleanUp' and 'get->lock->get again->put->unlock' can be replaced by computeIfAbsent. 2016-04-08 16:43 GMT+08:00 Elliott Clark :

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

As a side benefit, only testing one jdk would seriously speed up test runs. +1 On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Stack wrote: > Is there a YETUS issue for this Sean or should I file one? > St.Ack > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

Is there a YETUS issue for this Sean or should I file one? St.Ack On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > we'll need to get a feature into yetus that can change multijdk > settings by branch, presuming that change will result in us either > taking on jdk8-only

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

we'll need to get a feature into yetus that can change multijdk settings by branch, presuming that change will result in us either taking on jdk8-only dependencies or direct use of jdk8-only features. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Stack wrote: > Any objection? > > jdk7 is

[DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

Any objection? jdk7 is dead, EOL'd. You all good w/ this? St.Ack