It sounds like we have consensus. I filed HBASE-17823 for implementation.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> It's only been 8 hours Ted, let's wait a bit to make sure folks have a
> chance to contribute to the discussion if they like.
>
> On Mar 20, 2017
It's only been 8 hours Ted, let's wait a bit to make sure folks have a
chance to contribute to the discussion if they like.
On Mar 20, 2017 4:28 PM, "Ted Yu" wrote:
Sean:
Can you log a JIRA so that we can move this forward ?
Cheers
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Josh
Sean:
Can you log a JIRA so that we can move this forward ?
Cheers
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Sean Busbey wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
>>
>>> Is Yetus 0.4.0 release stable ?
>>>
>>>
>> yes.
>>
>>
Sean Busbey wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
Is Yetus 0.4.0 release stable ?
yes.
If we use Yetus annotations, is there only one jar pulled in as dependency ?
IIRC, we'll get one jar as a dependency. There shouldn't be any
transitive
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Is Yetus 0.4.0 release stable ?
>
yes.
> If we use Yetus annotations, is there only one jar pulled in as dependency ?
>
IIRC, we'll get one jar as a dependency. There shouldn't be any
transitive dependencies involved.
Is Yetus 0.4.0 release stable ?
If we use Yetus annotations, is there only one jar pulled in as dependency ?
Cheers
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I'd like us to start moving towards using the audience annotations
> from the Apache Yetus
Hi folks!
I'd like us to start moving towards using the audience annotations
from the Apache Yetus project[1] so we can remove the same kind of
implementation code from our codebase.
For background, a while ago Apache Hadoop made some Java annotations
to denote what APIs were appropriate for