Re: [NOTICE] Hadoop project discussing EOL for Hadoop 2.7

2019-01-25 Thread Sean Busbey
yep! I agree that would be consistent with the previous consensus position if that's what we want to do. I'll try to take a look at the state of 2.8 and 2.9 and see if I can answer your earlier question about "why not just go to for minimum 2.9 instead of 2.8?" On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 1:22 PM

Re: [NOTICE] Hadoop project discussing EOL for Hadoop 2.7

2019-01-25 Thread Andrew Purtell
By that rationale, for 1.6.0, we could look at setting the minimum Hadoop version to 2.8. I almost have 1.5.0 out the door and Hadoop hasn't concluded the 2.7 EOL discussion yet. On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:08 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > it's dangerous to change our default build to be something

Re: [NOTICE] Hadoop project discussing EOL for Hadoop 2.7

2019-01-25 Thread Sean Busbey
it's dangerous to change our default build to be something other than the oldest version we claim works because devs are less likely to notice when they make use of some new feature Hadoop added. It would help with what we ship in convenience packages, provided we do some reasonable testing of

Re: [NOTICE] Hadoop project discussing EOL for Hadoop 2.7

2019-01-25 Thread Andrew Purtell
I don't think we can drop support like that for minors per our compatibility guidelines. I don't know how many run 2.7 or 2.8 in production. We use 2.7 so for our own sake I'm -1 on this proposal. However we could change the default 2.x version we build against to 2.9.2. Shall we discuss that ?

Re: [NOTICE] Hadoop project discussing EOL for Hadoop 2.7

2019-01-25 Thread Duo Zhang
I think we can drop the support of 2.7.x and 2.8.x when releasing 2.2.0 and 1.5.0? And is it the time to change our default building profile from hadoop2 to hadoop3? Andrew Purtell 于2019年1月25日周五 上午11:22写道: > We could see what 2.9.2 looks like in terms of suitability and stability. > Is there

Re: [NOTICE] Hadoop project discussing EOL for Hadoop 2.7

2019-01-24 Thread Andrew Purtell
We could see what 2.9.2 looks like in terms of suitability and stability. Is there any reason to look at 2.8 instead of jumping directly to 2.9? On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 1:33 PM Sean Busbey wrote: > heads up that the Apache Hadoop project is discussing marking their 2.7 > release line as EOL: >

[NOTICE] Hadoop project discussing EOL for Hadoop 2.7

2019-01-24 Thread Sean Busbey
heads up that the Apache Hadoop project is discussing marking their 2.7 release line as EOL: https://s.apache.org/Nm83 Hadoop 2.7.1+ is the most recent Hadoop release line to get the "(y)" marker in our Hadoop matrix for HBase branches-1. It's also the earliest Hadoop release line to get the