On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Elliott Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
>
>> I am afraid, it is not coprocessors or current set of plugins only. We need
>> changes in the
>> RPC, meta, region server, LB and master. Since we cannot easily get hooks
>> into all
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> I am afraid, it is not coprocessors or current set of plugins only. We need
> changes in the
> RPC, meta, region server, LB and master. Since we cannot easily get hooks
> into all these in
> a clean manner, implementing this purely outside w
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> > > However, with different tables, it will be unintuitive
> > > since the meta, and the
> > > client side would have to bring different regions of different tables
> to
> > > make sense. T
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> > > However, with different tables, it will be unintuitive
> > > since the meta, and the
> > > client side would have to bring different regions of different tables
> to
> > > make sense. T
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Stack wrote:
> > However, with different tables, it will be unintuitive
> > since the meta, and the
> > client side would have to bring different regions of different tables to
> > make sense. Those tables
> > will not have any associated data, but refer to the ot
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> >
> > > > I am late to the game so take my comments w/ a grain of salt -- I'll
> > > take a
> > > > look at HBASE-10070 -- but high-level do we have to go the read
> > replicas
> > > > route? IMO, having our current already-strained Assignm
>
> > > I am late to the game so take my comments w/ a grain of salt -- I'll
> > take a
> > > look at HBASE-10070 -- but high-level do we have to go the read
> replicas
> > > route? IMO, having our current already-strained AssignmentManager code
> > > base manage three replicas instead of one will
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
> Some responses inline. Thanks for the inputs.
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Stack wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Enis Söztutar >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I just wanted to give some updates on the HBASE-10070 effort
Some responses inline. Thanks for the inputs.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Stack wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just wanted to give some updates on the HBASE-10070 efforts from the
>> technical side, and development side, and propose a branch
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Stack wrote:
> A few of us chatting offline -- Jimmy, Jon, Elliott, and I -- were
> wondering if you couldn't solve this read replicas in a more hbase 'native'
> way* by just bringing up three tables -- a main table and then two snapshot
> clones with the clones
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to give some updates on the HBASE-10070 efforts from the
> technical side, and development side, and propose a branch.
>
> From the technical side:
> The changes for region replicas phase 1 are becoming more mature and
Hi,
I just wanted to give some updates on the HBASE-10070 efforts from the
technical side, and development side, and propose a branch.
>From the technical side:
The changes for region replicas phase 1 are becoming more mature and
stable, and most of the "base" changes are starting to become good
12 matches
Mail list logo
