On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
Deveraj:
Jonathan Hsieh, WAL per region (WALpr) would give you the locality (and
hence HDFS short
circuit) of reads if you were to couple it with the favored nodes. The
cost is of course more WAL
files... In the
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
Deveraj:
Jonathan Hsieh, WAL per region (WALpr) would give you the locality (and
hence HDFS short
circuit) of reads if you were to couple it with the favored nodes. The
cost is of course more WAL
files... In the
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
With this in mind, I actually I making the case that we would group the
all
the regions from RS-A onto the same set of preferred regions
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
Deveraj:
Jonathan Hsieh, WAL per region (WALpr) would give you the locality (and
hence HDFS short
circuit) of reads if you were to couple
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Deveraj:
Jonathan Hsieh, WAL per region (WALpr) would give you
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
Deveraj:
Jonathan Hsieh, WAL per region (WALpr) would give you the locality (and
hence HDFS short
circuit) of reads if you were to couple it with the favored nodes. The
cost is of course more WAL
files... In the current situation (no WALpr) it would create quite some
traffic cross machine, no?
