On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>
>> [1]:
>>
>> I now realize the issue with using gpg printed md5: the md5 files end up in
>> a different format for dist.apache than the md5 files
With 4 binding +1's and 5 +1's total, no -0 and no -1, this vote passes.
Thanks to everyone who took the time to vote on this release. Hope to see
you all again next month.
-n
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Sean
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> [1]:
>
> I now realize the issue with using gpg printed md5: the md5 files end up in
> a different format for dist.apache than the md5 files pushed into
> repository.apache.
> the latter match md5sum / md5 -r output.
>
>
+1
* checked signatures / sums[1]
* spot checked file header compliance using apache-rat plugin on clean
source unpack
* build from source[2]
* source matches commit 239b80456118175b340b2e562a5568b5c744252e
(which the signed tag mentioned pointed to when I checked)[3]
[1]:
I now realize the
+1
- Checked sums and signatures. Signing key needs updating from your
favorite hkp server (I used keys.gnupg.net) and then won't show as expired.
- Unpacked tarballs, layouts look good. Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE
files.
- Built from source with release auditing enabled, passed (7u79)
- Unit
+1
- Deployed onto a 5-node container cluster from binary tarball. Did some
sanity checks of the HBase shell and web UI, all looks good.
- Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList in loop mode with 1 billion nodes;
passed without a problem.
-Dima
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Matteo Bertozzi
+1
- compiled from source and run few unit-test
TestAdmin*,Test*Master*,Test*Region*
- inspected the binary
- started hbase from both source and binary
- few commands from shell: create/disable/enable/drop/split, put/get/scan,
snapshot/clone_snapshot
- run PerformanceEvaluation with random
A reminder, everyone, that this vote is scheduled to conclude in ~40 hours.
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> *** Please note that my key expired since the previous release. I have
> updated its expiration, pushed to pgp.mit.edu, updated the KEYS file
>
+1
Ran unit test suite
Exercised basic shell commands
Ran LoadTestTool on a small cluster
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> - verified tarballs vs public key in KEYS file.
> - extracted bin tgz:
> - inspect structure. look good.
> - run LoadTestTool
Too true; I thought that commit went rather quickly... Uploading them now.
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Nick:
> I was looking at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.5RC0/ but didn't
> seem to find the actual .tar.gz files.
>
> Can
Nick:
I was looking at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.5RC0/ but didn't
seem to find the actual .tar.gz files.
Can you double check ?
Thanks
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> *** Please note that my key expired since the previous
- verified tarballs vs public key in KEYS file.
- extracted bin tgz:
- inspect structure. look good.
- run LoadTestTool against standalone bin tgz with FAST_DIFF block
encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, logs look good.
- poked around webUI. looks good.
- verified version in MasterUI
*** Please note that my key expired since the previous release. I have
updated its expiration, pushed to pgp.mit.edu, updated the KEYS file linked
below, and attempted to force an update on id.apache.org. I don't know how
long it will take for people.apache.org to refresh. ***
*** Please note
13 matches
Mail list logo