Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-13 Thread Sean Busbey
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > >> [1]: >> >> I now realize the issue with using gpg printed md5: the md5 files end up in >> a different format for dist.apache than the md5 files

[RESULT] [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-13 Thread Nick Dimiduk
With 4 binding +1's and 5 +1's total, no -0 and no -1, this vote passes. Thanks to everyone who took the time to vote on this release. Hope to see you all again next month. -n On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Sean

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-13 Thread Nick Dimiduk
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > [1]: > > I now realize the issue with using gpg printed md5: the md5 files end up in > a different format for dist.apache than the md5 files pushed into > repository.apache. > the latter match md5sum / md5 -r output. > >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-12 Thread Sean Busbey
+1 * checked signatures / sums[1] * spot checked file header compliance using apache-rat plugin on clean source unpack * build from source[2] * source matches commit 239b80456118175b340b2e562a5568b5c744252e (which the signed tag mentioned pointed to when I checked)[3] [1]: I now realize the

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-11 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 - Checked sums and signatures. Signing key needs updating from your favorite hkp server (I used keys.gnupg.net) and then won't show as expired. - Unpacked tarballs, layouts look good. Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE files. - Built from source with release auditing enabled, passed (7u79) - Unit

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-11 Thread Dima Spivak
+1 - Deployed onto a 5-node container cluster from binary tarball. Did some sanity checks of the HBase shell and web UI, all looks good. - Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList in loop mode with 1 billion nodes; passed without a problem. -Dima On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Matteo Bertozzi

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-11 Thread Matteo Bertozzi
+1 - compiled from source and run few unit-test TestAdmin*,Test*Master*,Test*Region* - inspected the binary - started hbase from both source and binary - few commands from shell: create/disable/enable/drop/split, put/get/scan, snapshot/clone_snapshot - run PerformanceEvaluation with random

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-11 Thread Nick Dimiduk
A reminder, everyone, that this vote is scheduled to conclude in ~40 hours. On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > *** Please note that my key expired since the previous release. I have > updated its expiration, pushed to pgp.mit.edu, updated the KEYS file >

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-09 Thread Ted Yu
+1 Ran unit test suite Exercised basic shell commands Ran LoadTestTool on a small cluster On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > - verified tarballs vs public key in KEYS file. > - extracted bin tgz: > - inspect structure. look good. > - run LoadTestTool

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-09 Thread Nick Dimiduk
Too true; I thought that commit went rather quickly... Uploading them now. On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Nick: > I was looking at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.5RC0/ but didn't > seem to find the actual .tar.gz files. > > Can

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-08 Thread Ted Yu
Nick: I was looking at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.5RC0/ but didn't seem to find the actual .tar.gz files. Can you double check ? Thanks On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > *** Please note that my key expired since the previous

Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-08 Thread Nick Dimiduk
- verified tarballs vs public key in KEYS file. - extracted bin tgz: - inspect structure. look good. - run LoadTestTool against standalone bin tgz with FAST_DIFF block encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, logs look good. - poked around webUI. looks good. - verified version in MasterUI

[VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.5 (RC0) is available

2016-05-08 Thread Nick Dimiduk
*** Please note that my key expired since the previous release. I have updated its expiration, pushed to pgp.mit.edu, updated the KEYS file linked below, and attempted to force an update on id.apache.org. I don't know how long it will take for people.apache.org to refresh. *** *** Please note