Re: [jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-8591) Doc Improvement: Replication blog

2013-05-22 Thread Himanshu Vashishtha
Since the source metrics would not be available in case the master cluster is down, your best bet would be sink.ageOfLastAppliedOp at the slave cluster. Its value is the timestamp of the last WALEdit that is applied to the slave. On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:02 AM, N Dm nid...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-8591) Doc Improvement: Replication blog

2013-05-22 Thread Demai Ni
Himanshu, Thanks a lot. Your suggestion saved me a lot of time if have to figure it out myself Demai on the run On May 22, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Himanshu Vashishtha hv.cs...@gmail.com wrote: Since the source metrics would not be available in case the master cluster is down, your best bet

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-8591) Doc Improvement: Replication blog

2013-05-22 Thread Varun Sharma
Hi Himanshu, I have a follow up question on these metrics. I see that both these metrics basically diff against the timestamp of the WALEdit. The timestamp on the WALEdit is generated by the region server in source cluster. So if there is some clock skew (even 1 second) on the slave cluster, the

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-8591) Doc Improvement: Replication blog

2013-05-21 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-8591. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.98.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Committed to trunk. Thanks