There is an existing DISCUSS thread re: moving the stable pointer,
mentioned here in an earlier post.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1cc4528a6a35cd1b0d38398aa61ad642a368901795d6970544d0a0a9%40%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 9:07 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
> please start a ded
please start a dedicated DISCUSS thread about moving the stable pointer.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 11:33 PM Yu Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since 2.4.6 has been released on Sep. 13th and we plan to EOL 2.3.x, shall
> we move the stable pointer to 2.4 (it's still on 2.3.6 for now on our
> download page [
Hi all,
Since 2.4.6 has been released on Sep. 13th and we plan to EOL 2.3.x, shall
we move the stable pointer to 2.4 (it's still on 2.3.6 for now on our
download page [1])? Or any concerns? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Yu
[1] https://hbase.apache.org/downloads.html
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 06:01, Andrew
I’ve been working with 2.4 for months and it is stable enough for me to +1
moving the pointer at this time. This work includes many tests with 2.4 using
ITBLL with slowDeterministic and serverKilling policies and there has not been
an unstable result, as defined by crashes/loss of daemons by the
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 1:22 PM Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> EOL of 2.3 seems premature.
>
> The stable pointer is still pointing to 2.3.
>
> Advancing the stable pointer is an obvious prerequisite. If there are any
> concerns blocking advancing the pointer to 2.4, this is where we should
> start the d
EOL of 2.3 seems premature.
The stable pointer is still pointing to 2.3.
Advancing the stable pointer is an obvious prerequisite. If there are any
concerns blocking advancing the pointer to 2.4, this is where we should start
the discussion.
> On Aug 2, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrot
