Here's my +1.
That's 6 in favor and no other votes. I'll file an issue to track the clean
up work
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 11:25 AM Peter Somogyi wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 6:22 PM Nick Dimiduk wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:58 Sean Busbey wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
+1
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 6:22 PM Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:58 Sean Busbey wrote:
>
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > Discussion threads:
> >
> > https://s.apache.org/i56se
> > https://s.apache.org/w1rit
> >
> > tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
+1
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:58 Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Discussion threads:
>
> https://s.apache.org/i56se
> https://s.apache.org/w1rit
>
> tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
>
> +1 for EOL?
>
+1
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 11:28 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Discussion threads:
>
> https://s.apache.org/i56se
> https://s.apache.org/w1rit
>
> tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
>
> +1 for EOL?
>
+1
Andrew Purtell 于2022年1月22日 周六03:25写道：
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:58 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
>
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > Discussion threads:
> >
> > https://s.apache.org/i56se
> > https://s.apache.org/w1rit
> >
> > tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
> >
> > +1
+1
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:58 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Discussion threads:
>
> https://s.apache.org/i56se
> https://s.apache.org/w1rit
>
> tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
>
> +1 for EOL?
>
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Unrest, ignorance distilled,
