Merged the HBASE-21879 back to master branch, Thanks all.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 10:40 AM OpenInx wrote:
> Now we have four +1 votes ( all binding).
> Will wait a day before the merge, if no objections I will do the merge.
> Thanks all for reviewing & checking.
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at
Now we have four +1 votes ( all binding).
Will wait a day before the merge, if no objections I will do the merge.
Thanks all for reviewing & checking.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 11:05 PM Anoop John wrote:
> +1 for master merge
>
> Anoop
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 9:47 AM ramkrishna vasudevan <
>
+1 for master merge
Anoop
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 9:47 AM ramkrishna vasudevan <
ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to merge to master. Great job Zheng
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 8:41 AM Guanghao Zhang wrote:
>
> > +1 for merge this to master.
> >
> > OpenInx 于2019年6月21日周五 下午2:56写道：
+1 to merge to master. Great job Zheng
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 8:41 AM Guanghao Zhang wrote:
> +1 for merge this to master.
>
> OpenInx 于2019年6月21日周五 下午2:56写道：
>
> > Update:
> >
> > The ByteBuffer pread backport is under reviewing now.
> > https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/997
> >
> > As
+1 for merge this to master.
OpenInx 于2019年6月21日周五 下午2:56写道：
> Update:
>
> The ByteBuffer pread backport is under reviewing now.
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/997
>
> As Hadoop team said, the Hadoop 2.8 will be EOL soon, so our HDFS team
> will backport this patch to
> branch-2 &
Update:
The ByteBuffer pread backport is under reviewing now.
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/997
As Hadoop team said, the Hadoop 2.8 will be EOL soon, so our HDFS team
will backport this patch to
branch-2 & branch-2.9, we may need to upgrade the hadoop dependencies from
2.8.5 to 2.9.3
Thanks for your reviewing and flaky test checking, Duo.
Will file a separate issue to address your comment if necessary.
Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:55 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Left a few comments on github PR, not big problems. And the flaky dashboard
> is pretty good.
Good. Will take a look soon.
OpenInx 于2019年6月18日周二 下午9:41写道：
> > Could please open a PR, just like what I have done for HBASE-21512, so
> that others could have a overall view on the modified code?
>
> OK, created a PR for this: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/320
> Thanks for your
> Could please open a PR, just like what I have done for HBASE-21512, so
that others could have a overall view on the modified code?
OK, created a PR for this: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/320
Thanks for your suggestion, Duo.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:24 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> The
The performance number is great.
Could please open a PR, just like what I have done for HBASE-21512, so that
others could have a overall view on the modified code?
Thanks.
OpenInx 于2019年6月18日周二 下午6:58写道：
> BTW, when testing this branch, we found some performance issues about
> HDFS Client:
BTW, when testing this branch, we found some performance issues about
HDFS Client:
1. we reduced the DFS client's heap allocation from 45% to 27%
in HDFS-14535 [1];
2. we also increased get throughput by 17.8% in disabled block cache case
in HDFS-14541[2].
In theory, it should also helps
The HBASE-21879 has lots of changes: 123 files changed, 5833 insertions(+),
3015 deletions(-).
Currently we developed this issue based on master branch, and expect to
release it in future HBase3.x.
Of course, if branch-2 want this feature we can do the backport, should
have some conflicts now but
This is a improvement not a new feature? So backport to branch-2, too?
OpenInx 于2019年6月17日周一 下午2:45写道：
> Dear HBase dev:
>
> In HBASE-21879[1], we redesigned the offheap read path: read the HFileBlock
> from HDFS to pooled offheap
> ByteBuffers directly, while before HBASE-21879 we just read
13 matches
Mail list logo
