Re: [VOTE] HBase Thirdparty 2.2.0 RC1

2019-04-01 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
Sure ,I will repost question and logs with new thread . Thanks

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 11:59 PM, Stack  wrote:

> Shekar:
>
> You put your note on a VOTE thread. Please redo your query in its own
> thread to hbase dev.
>
> Can you paste some log when you redo your message on the dev list?
>
> Thanks,
> S
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:33 AM Shekhar Dhotre <
> shekhar.dho...@clairvoyantsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All ,
> > I have a cluster which is setup to replicate to GCP . In the log its
> > showing cluster ID null so found this document which shows how to setup
> > cluster ID .but that is for a third party product called FusionInsight
> > Manager.
> >
> >
> >
> http://support-it.huawei.com/docs/en-us/fusioninsight-all/maintenance-guide/en-us_topic_0087315479.html
> >
> >
> > Where can I setup the below in Cloudera ?
> >
> > HBase Startup Failure Due to cluster.id Not Configured
> >
> > Region severs starts but as soon as I try to start master ,it brings down
> > all RS and master also doesnt come up .
> >
> > Thanks for your help in advance .
> > SD
> > Hadoop Admin .
> >
>
-- 

Thank you !


* Shekhar Dhotre.*

senior Hadoop Administrator

shekhar.dho...@clairvoyantsoft.com 

clairvoyantsoft.com/insight


[jira] [Created] (HBASE-22145) windows hbase-env causes hbase cli/etc to ignore HBASE_OPTS

2019-04-01 Thread Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)
Sergey Shelukhin created HBASE-22145:


 Summary: windows hbase-env causes hbase cli/etc to ignore 
HBASE_OPTS
 Key: HBASE-22145
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22145
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (HBASE-22144) MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans

2019-04-01 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)
Josh Elser created HBASE-22144:
--

 Summary: MultiRowRangeFilter does not work with reversed scans
 Key: HBASE-22144
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22144
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Josh Elser
Assignee: Josh Elser


It appears that MultiRowRangeFilter was never written to function with reverse 
scans. There is too much logic that operates with the assumption that we are 
always moving "forward" through increasing ranges. It needs to be rewritten to 
"traverse" forward or backward, given how the context of the scan being used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


Re: [DISCUSS] release hbase-connectors

2019-04-01 Thread Stack
You the man Balazs.

No harm in putting up a 1.0.0 I'd say.

(There's a bit of a script on HBASE-22136 used building an hbase-thirdparty
that might be of use. The README in hbase-thirdparty has some notes on how
it was RC'd that might be of help doing hbase-connectors. Shout if I can
help).

Thanks,
S

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 4:43 AM Balazs Meszaros
 wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Since 2.0 connectors have been moved out from hbase repository to
> hbase-connectors. We have several 2.x releases so far, but we haven't
> released hbase-connectors.
>
> 1. Are there any known issues which prevents us releasing it? Currently I
> see 5 open issue where component = hbase-connectors [1].
> 2. Should the first release work with Java 11? Or Java 8 compatibility is
> enough?
> 3. I ran the tests and they succeeded. Currently pom.xml depends on HBase
> 2.1.0, so I ran the tests only against that version. What versions should
> we test?
> 4. How should we release it? I do not have too much experiences with the
> releases but I am happy to give helping hand.
>
> Best regards,
> Balazs
>
> [1] https://s.apache.org/APjq
>


Re: [VOTE] HBase Thirdparty 2.2.0 RC1

2019-04-01 Thread Stack
Shekar:

You put your note on a VOTE thread. Please redo your query in its own
thread to hbase dev.

Can you paste some log when you redo your message on the dev list?

Thanks,
S

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:33 AM Shekhar Dhotre <
shekhar.dho...@clairvoyantsoft.com> wrote:

> Hi All ,
> I have a cluster which is setup to replicate to GCP . In the log its
> showing cluster ID null so found this document which shows how to setup
> cluster ID .but that is for a third party product called FusionInsight
> Manager.
>
>
> http://support-it.huawei.com/docs/en-us/fusioninsight-all/maintenance-guide/en-us_topic_0087315479.html
>
>
> Where can I setup the below in Cloudera ?
>
> HBase Startup Failure Due to cluster.id Not Configured
>
> Region severs starts but as soon as I try to start master ,it brings down
> all RS and master also doesnt come up .
>
> Thanks for your help in advance .
> SD
> Hadoop Admin .
>


Re: [DISCUSS] hbck2 evolve independently X avoiding having client side logic on hbck2 commands

2019-04-01 Thread Stack
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 9:56 AM Wellington Chevreuil <
wellington.chevre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
>


>
> Am interested to hear what's the general opinion on the way to move forward
> with hbck2? Should we completely discourage client bound logic patches such
> as the one from HBASE-22143 ?
>


No. If in a bind -- need to change a state but don't have the facility on
the master to do it in the kosher way -- then you have no recourse but to
do 'dirty tricks' as HBASE-22143 does making use of 'private' Interfaces.

What you think Wellington of checking master version in the client-side and
doing 'dirty tricks' version if master version is old but taking the
master-route when it provides support; i.e. when making a fix, we'd do two
versions: one via the ordained route of asking the master to make the
change for us, and then a workaround second version for those deploys that
don't currently have the master-side support?

Thanks for bringing up this topic,
S


[DISCUSS] hbck2 evolve independently X avoiding having client side logic on hbck2 commands

2019-04-01 Thread Wellington Chevreuil
My understanding on the motivation of moving hbck2 (and potentially other
operation related tools) to a separate project was to allow it to evolve on
its own cadence, as new interventions to fix previously unforeseen problems
were identified, we would now be able to deliver updated tool versions
without requiring a new release on the main projects, therefore avoiding
the need of a cluster upgrade.

At same time, the current pattern for hbck2 at least is to avoid giving too
much control of regions assignment inconsistencies over to the client,
favouring an approach where hbck2 client mainly act as a proxy for fix
methods exposed at master RPC interface. That way, master is able to keep
track of all procedures manipulating regions, where an independent process
manipulating regions at same time could cause more problems than fix it (we
saw this happening many times with misuse of hbck v1 methods).

However, with such restriction we are again limiting the ability to evolve
independently of main project releases and cluster upgrades. With growing
adoption of branch-2 based releases by our customer base, there's been a
surge on assignment issues, which can't be fixed solely with the existing
hbck2 commands. One example I had is what motivated HBASE-22143. I would
favour the approach of allowing more complex client methods, mainly because
it allows for adding new fixes on demand, but there's also value on keeping
things owned by master.

Am interested to hear what's the general opinion on the way to move forward
with hbck2? Should we completely discourage client bound logic patches such
as the one from HBASE-22143 ?


[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-21525) java.io.IOException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: clone_snapshot from hbase2.0.0 to hbase1.2.0

2019-04-01 Thread Pankaj Kumar (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pankaj Kumar resolved HBASE-21525.
--
Resolution: Duplicate

Closing this as a duplicate of HBASE-16189

> java.io.IOException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:  clone_snapshot from 
> hbase2.0.0 to hbase1.2.0
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-21525
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21525
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: snapshots
>Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 2.0.0
>Reporter: huan
>Priority: Minor
>
> When I use 
> {code:java}
> hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.snapshot.ExportSnapshot -snapshot 
> "wh_scan_issue_monitor_on_snap_1" -copy-from hdfs://:8020/hbase  -copy-to 
> hdfs://xxx:8020/hbase
> {code}
> to copy snapshot from hbase2.0.0 to hbase 1.2.0 and then use
> {code:java}
> clone_snapshot 
> 'wh_scan_issue_monitor_on_snap_1',"wh_scan_issue_monitor_table"{code}
> to restore the table;
> There are no errors on client and hbase master.
> but I can not scan any data in this new table.
> So when I search the log in regionserver which that region running on .I find 
> the below error log
>  
> {code:java}
> 2018-11-29 13:39:45,826 ERROR 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFile$Reader: Error reading bloom 
> filter meta for GENERAL_BLOOM_META -- proceeding without
> java.io.IOException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.FixedFileTrailer.getComparatorClass(FixedFileTrailer.java:581)
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.FixedFileTrailer.createComparator(FixedFileTrailer.java:588)
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CompoundBloomFilter.(CompoundBloomFilter.java:73)
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.BloomFilterFactory.createFromMeta(BloomFilterFactory.java:109)
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFile$Reader.loadBloomfilter(StoreFile.java:1469)
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFile$Reader.access$000(StoreFile.java:1088)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFile.open(StoreFile.java:465)
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFile.createReader(StoreFile.java:509)
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFile.createReader(StoreFile.java:499)
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.createStoreFileAndReader(HStore.java:676)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.access$000(HStore.java:119)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore$1.call(HStore.java:543)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore$1.call(HStore.java:540)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
> at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:264)
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.FixedFileTrailer.getComparatorClass(FixedFileTrailer.java:578)
> ... 18 more
> {code}
>  
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


Re: [DISCUSS] release hbase-connectors

2019-04-01 Thread Sean Busbey
We're not ready to work with Java 11 as a project yet, IMHO, so Java 8
should be fine.

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 6:43 AM Balazs Meszaros
 wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Since 2.0 connectors have been moved out from hbase repository to
> hbase-connectors. We have several 2.x releases so far, but we haven't
> released hbase-connectors.
>
> 1. Are there any known issues which prevents us releasing it? Currently I
> see 5 open issue where component = hbase-connectors [1].
> 2. Should the first release work with Java 11? Or Java 8 compatibility is
> enough?
> 3. I ran the tests and they succeeded. Currently pom.xml depends on HBase
> 2.1.0, so I ran the tests only against that version. What versions should
> we test?
> 4. How should we release it? I do not have too much experiences with the
> releases but I am happy to give helping hand.
>
> Best regards,
> Balazs
>
> [1] https://s.apache.org/APjq
>


[jira] [Created] (HBASE-22143) HBCK2 setRegionState command

2019-04-01 Thread Wellington Chevreuil (JIRA)
Wellington Chevreuil created HBASE-22143:


 Summary: HBCK2 setRegionState command
 Key: HBASE-22143
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22143
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: hbase-operator-tools, hbck2
Reporter: Wellington Chevreuil


Among some of the current AMv2 issues, we faced situation where some regions 
had state as OPENING in meta, with an RS startcode that was not valid anymore. 
There was no AP running, the region stays permanently being logged as 
IN-Transition on master logs, yet no procedure is really trying to bring it 
online. Current hbck2 unassigns/assigns commands didn't work either, as per the 
exception shown, it expects regions to be in state SPLITTING, SPLIT, MERGING, 
OPEN, or CLOSING:
{noformat}
WARN org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.RegionTransitionProcedure: 
Failed transition, suspend 1secs pid=7093, 
state=RUNNABLE:REGION_TRANSITION_DISPATCH, locked=true; UnassignProcedure 
table=rc_accounts, region=db85127b77fa56f7ad44e2c988e53925, 
server=server1.example.com,16020,1552682193324; rit=OPENING, 
location=server1.example.com,16020,1552682193324; waiting on rectified 
condition fixed by other Procedure or operator intervention
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.exceptions.UnexpectedStateException: Expected 
[SPLITTING, SPLIT, MERGING, OPEN, CLOSING] so could move to CLOSING but current 
state=OPENING
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.RegionStates$RegionStateNode.transitionState(RegionStates.java:166)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.AssignmentManager.markRegionAsClosing(AssignmentManager.java:1479)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.UnassignProcedure.updateTransition(UnassignProcedure.java:212)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.RegionTransitionProcedure.execute(RegionTransitionProcedure.java:369)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.RegionTransitionProcedure.execute(RegionTransitionProcedure.java:97)
at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.Procedure.doExecute(Procedure.java:957)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.ProcedureExecutor.execProcedure(ProcedureExecutor.java:1835)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure2.ProcedureExecutor.executeProcedure(ProcedureExecutor.java:1595){noformat}

In this specific case, since we know the region is not actually being operated 
by any proc and is not really open anywhere, it's ok to manually set it's state 
to one of those assigns/unassigns can operate on, so this jira proposes a new 
hbck2 command that allows for arbitrarily set a region to a given state.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


Re: [VOTE] HBase Thirdparty 2.2.0 RC1

2019-04-01 Thread Peter Somogyi
+1

Checked signature, checksum
Built from source
Ran Apache Rat check
Ran HBase master tests using this RC
Checked CHANGES and RELEASENOTES


On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 10:14 PM Stack  wrote:

> Please consider the following as the 2.2.0 release of Apache HBase
> Thirdparty. It is the second release candidate for your consideration.
>
> It is a year since our 2.1.0 release. 2.2.0 updates some of our core
> dependencies:
>
>  gson 2.8.1 -> 2.8.5
>  guava 22.0 -> 27.1-jre
>  pb 3.5.1 -> 3.7.0
>  netty 4.1.17 -> 4.1.34
>  commons-collections4 4.1 -> 4.3
>
> The coming hbase-2.2.0 RC would like to include an updated
> hbase-thirdparty.
>
> Source artifact, signatures, checksums, and changes are available at:
>
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-thirdparty/hbase-thirdparty-2.2.0RC1/
>
> The release was made against tag 2.2.0RC0. It was signed with my key
> 'st...@duboce.net' which can be found here:
>
>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hbase/KEYS
>
> Maven staging repository is available at:
>
>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1297
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Yours,
> Your HBase Release Manager
>


[jira] [Created] (HBASE-22142) Space quota: If table is dropped inside namespace, data size usage is still considered for the drop table.

2019-04-01 Thread Shardul Singh (JIRA)
Shardul Singh created HBASE-22142:
-

 Summary: Space quota: If table is dropped inside namespace, data 
size  usage is still considered for the drop table.
 Key: HBASE-22142
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22142
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.1.1
Reporter: Shardul Singh


 steps to follow:

1.create a quota at namespace level

2.create 2 tables t1 and t2 inside namespace and write data.

3.write 5 mb of data each in both t1 and t2.

4. drop t1.

5. data usage for t2 will be shown 10 mb for 10 minutes.

If table is dropped inside namespace, data size  usage is still shown for 10 
minutes because of the configuration 
"hbase.master.quotas.region.report.retention.millis". This conf maintains the 
region report in cache(regionSizes) and old entry is used for 10 minutes. We 
can remove the entry during the drop command only, so that correct usage is 
show instantaneously after the drop command.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[DISCUSS] release hbase-connectors

2019-04-01 Thread Balazs Meszaros
Hi All,

Since 2.0 connectors have been moved out from hbase repository to
hbase-connectors. We have several 2.x releases so far, but we haven't
released hbase-connectors.

1. Are there any known issues which prevents us releasing it? Currently I
see 5 open issue where component = hbase-connectors [1].
2. Should the first release work with Java 11? Or Java 8 compatibility is
enough?
3. I ran the tests and they succeeded. Currently pom.xml depends on HBase
2.1.0, so I ran the tests only against that version. What versions should
we test?
4. How should we release it? I do not have too much experiences with the
releases but I am happy to give helping hand.

Best regards,
Balazs

[1] https://s.apache.org/APjq


[jira] [Created] (HBASE-22141) Fix TestAsyncDecommissionAdminApi

2019-04-01 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
Duo Zhang created HBASE-22141:
-

 Summary: Fix TestAsyncDecommissionAdminApi
 Key: HBASE-22141
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22141
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Sub-task
  Components: test
Reporter: Duo Zhang
 Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.3.0






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


Hbase master down due to null cluster ID

2019-04-01 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
Hi All ,
I have a cluster which is setup to replicate to GCP . In the log its
showing cluster ID null so found this document which shows how to setup
cluster ID .but that is for a third party product called FusionInsight
Manager.

http://support-it.huawei.com/docs/en-us/fusioninsight-all/maintenance-guide/en-us_topic_0087315479.html


Where can I setup the below in Cloudera ?

HBase Startup Failure Due to cluster.id Not Configured

Region severs starts but as soon as I try to start master ,it brings down
all RS and master also doesnt come up .

Thanks for your help in advance .
SD
Hadoop Admin .
-- 

Thank you !


* Shekhar Dhotre.*

senior Hadoop Administrator

shekhar.dho...@clairvoyantsoft.com 

clairvoyantsoft.com/insight


Re: [VOTE] HBase Thirdparty 2.2.0 RC1

2019-04-01 Thread Yu Li
+1 (binding)

Checked sigs and sums: OK
Built from src: OK

Minor:
>From dev_files/make_rc.sh we are using "git archive" instead of "maven
package assembly:single", thus producing more files as listed below. Is
this on purpose? Thanks.
hbase-thirdparty-2.2.0/.gitignore
hbase-thirdparty-2.2.0/dev_files/make_rc.sh

Best Regards,
Yu


On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 05:14, Stack  wrote:

> Please consider the following as the 2.2.0 release of Apache HBase
> Thirdparty. It is the second release candidate for your consideration.
>
> It is a year since our 2.1.0 release. 2.2.0 updates some of our core
> dependencies:
>
>  gson 2.8.1 -> 2.8.5
>  guava 22.0 -> 27.1-jre
>  pb 3.5.1 -> 3.7.0
>  netty 4.1.17 -> 4.1.34
>  commons-collections4 4.1 -> 4.3
>
> The coming hbase-2.2.0 RC would like to include an updated
> hbase-thirdparty.
>
> Source artifact, signatures, checksums, and changes are available at:
>
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-thirdparty/hbase-thirdparty-2.2.0RC1/
>
> The release was made against tag 2.2.0RC0. It was signed with my key
> 'st...@duboce.net' which can be found here:
>
>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hbase/KEYS
>
> Maven staging repository is available at:
>
>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1297
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Yours,
> Your HBase Release Manager
>


Re: Replacement for CellUtil.setTimestamp()

2019-04-01 Thread ramkrishna vasudevan
The later JIRAs like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19092
exposed a CellBuilder and the CP has access to a the RawCellBuilder which
will allow you to do a setTimeStamp on it.
But note that it allows does a deep copy of the Cell bytes when the new
cell is created out of the builder.

Let us know if this helps or you need some other APIs to make things easier.

Regards
Ram



On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Wellington Chevreuil <
wellington.chevre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> You could risk use PrivateCellUtil.setTimestamp() method, but it may break
> in future releases since PrivateCellUtil is marked
> as @InterfaceAudience.Private. Another option, given both Put and Delete
> map to KeyValue cell type, is to check if the Cell type is KeyValue, then
> do a cast to access setTimestamp method on the KV.
>
> Em sex, 29 de mar de 2019 às 22:34, Thomas D'Silva
>  escreveu:
>
> > In HBase 2.0 since CellUtil.setTimestamp has been deprecated, what is the
> > correct way to set the timestamp of a cell from a coprocessor? Phoenix
> uses
> > this API to set the timestamp of a call in our mutable indexing
> coprocessor
> > (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5219).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] HBase Thirdparty 2.2.0 RC1

2019-04-01 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
Hi All ,
I have a cluster which is setup to replicate to GCP . In the log its
showing cluster ID null so found this document which shows how to setup
cluster ID .but that is for a third party product called FusionInsight
Manager.

http://support-it.huawei.com/docs/en-us/fusioninsight-all/maintenance-guide/en-us_topic_0087315479.html


Where can I setup the below in Cloudera ?

HBase Startup Failure Due to cluster.id Not Configured

Region severs starts but as soon as I try to start master ,it brings down
all RS and master also doesnt come up .

Thanks for your help in advance .
SD
Hadoop Admin .


[jira] [Created] (HBASE-22140) Fix those flaky tests in master branch

2019-04-01 Thread Zheng Hu (JIRA)
Zheng Hu created HBASE-22140:


 Summary: Fix those flaky tests in master branch
 Key: HBASE-22140
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22140
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Zheng Hu


Found few flaky tests when running Hadoop QA for HBASE-22005,  

see: 
https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-Find-Flaky-Tests/job/master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)