Re: [DISCUSS] deprecating jdk8, progress on LTS jdk support

2022-02-17 Thread Josh Elser
On 2/16/22 12:24 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: Regarding the original question, I would be in favor of the proposal. Time marches on. I assume just to state the obvious that our destination of minimum LTS would shift from 8 to 11. Yes, sorry I should have expressly stated JDK11 would become the

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-26756) remove disabled hbase jobs from ci-hadoop

2022-02-17 Thread Sean Busbey (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey resolved HBASE-26756. - Resolution: Fixed went ahead and cleared things out. > remove disabled hbase jobs from

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-26696) Migrate our jenkins jobs from ci-hadoop to ci-hbase

2022-02-17 Thread Sean Busbey (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey resolved HBASE-26696. - Resolution: Fixed this is all wrapped up now. > Migrate our jenkins jobs from ci-hadoop to

Re: [DISCUSS] deprecating jdk8, progress on LTS jdk support

2022-02-17 Thread Steve Loughran
j On 2022/02/15 22:27:50 Andrew Purtell wrote: > The primary consideration to my mind is the state of S3A: in what version it > can be said to be stable and feature complete. I think 3.3 is the appropriate > code line for that criteria but perhaps 3.2 could serve as well. 3.3.1. i have not

Re: [DISCUSS] operator tools, HBase 3 and StoreFileTracking

2022-02-17 Thread Andrew Purtell
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 12:19 PM Peter Somogyi wrote: > I like the idea of including the store file tracking in 2.5.0 to unblock > the HBCK development efforts. > > Unfortunately, I was not following its development that much. Can it cause > any issues if 2.5.0 has the feature but later an

Re: [DISCUSS] operator tools, HBase 3 and StoreFileTracking

2022-02-17 Thread Peter Somogyi
Makes sense. Thanks Andrew for clarifying! On Thu, Feb 17, 2022, 21:28 Andrew Purtell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 12:19 PM Peter Somogyi > wrote: > > > I like the idea of including the store file tracking in 2.5.0 to unblock > > the HBCK development efforts. > > > > Unfortunately, I was

Re: [DISCUSS] deprecating jdk8, progress on LTS jdk support

2022-02-17 Thread Sean Busbey
so we would require a specific patch release of Hadoop as a minimum? It's messy, but we've certainly done it before. On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 1:31 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:50 AM Steve Loughran wrote: > > > j > > On 2022/02/15 22:27:50 Andrew Purtell wrote: > > > > >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-26760) LICENSE handling should not allow non-aggregated "apache-2.0"

2022-02-17 Thread Sean Busbey (Jira)
Sean Busbey created HBASE-26760: --- Summary: LICENSE handling should not allow non-aggregated "apache-2.0" Key: HBASE-26760 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26760 Project: HBase

Re: [DISCUSS] operator tools, HBase 3 and StoreFileTracking

2022-02-17 Thread Peter Somogyi
I like the idea of including the store file tracking in 2.5.0 to unblock the HBCK development efforts. Unfortunately, I was not following its development that much. Can it cause any issues if 2.5.0 has the feature but later an incompatible change is needed for SFT? Can it be marked as a beta

Re: [DISCUSS] deprecating jdk8, progress on LTS jdk support

2022-02-17 Thread Andrew Purtell
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:50 AM Steve Loughran wrote: > j > On 2022/02/15 22:27:50 Andrew Purtell wrote: > > > The primary consideration to my mind is the state of S3A: in what > version it can be said to be stable and feature complete. I think 3.3 is > the appropriate code line for that