bq. Dropping all but LTS on major version
+1 to the above initiative.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:37 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Oof, more to do, but I think the list you put together is a good plan to
> start. Dropping all but LTS on major version sounds good as well.
>
> Thanks
Oof, more to do, but I think the list you put together is a good plan to
start. Dropping all but LTS on major version sounds good as well.
Thanks for thinking about this already.
On 3/6/18 12:20 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
Hi folks!
Our ref guide section on Java versions[1] is starting to look
> -- "Recommended" for running
>
> I think we should suggest folks rely on LTS releases of Java, wether
> from the OpenJDK project (which looks like it will be equivalent to
> the Oracle version) or a vender.
>
> That would mean updating our support matrix to call out Java 9 and
> Java 10 as "Not