subject:"\[DISCUSS\] HBASE\-18978 Table and AsyncTable alignment"

Re: [DISCUSS] HBASE-18978 Table and AsyncTable alignment

2017-10-16 Thread Peter Somogyi

Thanks Duo and Ted! bq. The coprocessor related methods are in RawAsyncTable interface. I'll add this to the spreadsheet. bq. I think that changing the return type only doesn't have to be done in this iteration. I agree, I will skip this part. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ted Yu

Re: [DISCUSS] HBASE-18978 Table and AsyncTable alignment

2017-10-13 Thread Ted Yu

Nice spreadsheet, Peter. w.r.t. Different return types, I took a look at the discussion on HBASE-18912. I think that changing the return type only doesn't have to be done in this iteration. Cheers On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Peter Somogyi wrote: > Hi, > > I

Re: [DISCUSS] HBASE-18978 Table and AsyncTable alignment

2017-10-13 Thread Duo Zhang

The coprocessor related methods are in RawAsyncTable interface. Peter Somogyi 于2017年10月14日周六08:16写道： > Hi, > > I started to work on HBASE-18978 (Align the methods in Table and > AsyncTable) and I would appreciate some feedback from you. > > To make it simpler to compare

[DISCUSS] HBASE-18978 Table and AsyncTable alignment

2017-10-13 Thread Peter Somogyi

Hi, I started to work on HBASE-18978 (Align the methods in Table and AsyncTable) and I would appreciate some feedback from you. To make it simpler to compare the differences between Table and AsyncTable I put together a spreadsheet.