With 4 binding +1s, the vote passes.
Thanks to all who voted. Let me push this out.
S
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:03 PM Stack wrote:
> Please consider the following as the 2.2.0 release of Apache HBase
> Thirdparty. It is the second release candidate for your consideration.
>
> It is a year since
Sure ,I will repost question and logs with new thread . Thanks
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 11:59 PM, Stack wrote:
> Shekar:
>
> You put your note on a VOTE thread. Please redo your query in its own
> thread to hbase dev.
>
> Can you paste some log when you redo your message on the dev list?
>
>
Shekar:
You put your note on a VOTE thread. Please redo your query in its own
thread to hbase dev.
Can you paste some log when you redo your message on the dev list?
Thanks,
S
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:33 AM Shekhar Dhotre <
shekhar.dho...@clairvoyantsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi All ,
> I have a
+1
Checked signature, checksum
Built from source
Ran Apache Rat check
Ran HBase master tests using this RC
Checked CHANGES and RELEASENOTES
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 10:14 PM Stack wrote:
> Please consider the following as the 2.2.0 release of Apache HBase
> Thirdparty. It is the second release
+1 (binding)
Checked sigs and sums: OK
Built from src: OK
Minor:
>From dev_files/make_rc.sh we are using "git archive" instead of "maven
package assembly:single", thus producing more files as listed below. Is
this on purpose? Thanks.
hbase-thirdparty-2.2.0/.gitignore
Hi All ,
I have a cluster which is setup to replicate to GCP . In the log its
showing cluster ID null so found this document which shows how to setup
cluster ID .but that is for a third party product called FusionInsight
Manager.
+1 from me because HBASE-22139 "Pass 2.2.0RC1 though hbase qa test suite"
passed.
S
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:03 PM Stack wrote:
> Please consider the following as the 2.2.0 release of Apache HBase
> Thirdparty. It is the second release candidate for your consideration.
>
> It is a year since
+1(binding)
Checked sigs and sums: OK
Built from src: OK
Compared the sizes of jars with 2.1.0: Seems fine.
And we also got a green build in HBASE-22139, which is good.
Stack 于2019年3月31日周日 上午9:59写道：
> And the maven link is
>
>
And the maven link is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1299 ,
not 1297 [1].
Thanks,
S
1. I built 1297 w/ jdk10. ByteBuffer in jdk10 doesn't have a position
method. It made an unrelated test fail when I tried 1297 against the tip of
hbase branch-2.2. 1299 is
The release was made against tag 2.2.0RC1, not 2.2.0RC0 as it states below.
S
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:03 PM Stack wrote:
> Please consider the following as the 2.2.0 release of Apache HBase
> Thirdparty. It is the second release candidate for your consideration.
>
> It is a year since our
Please consider the following as the 2.2.0 release of Apache HBase
Thirdparty. It is the second release candidate for your consideration.
It is a year since our 2.1.0 release. 2.2.0 updates some of our core
dependencies:
gson 2.8.1 -> 2.8.5
guava 22.0 -> 27.1-jre
pb 3.5.1 -> 3.7.0
netty
11 matches
Mail list logo
