Vote: HttpCore 5.0-beta7 release
[X] +1 Release the packages as HttpCore 5.0-beta7.
[ ] -1 I am against releasing the packages (must include a reason).
--
Asankha C. Perera
SLAppForge https://slappforge.com
AdroitLogic, https://www.adroitlogic.com
https://medium.com/@asankha
[x] +1 Release the packages as HttpCore 5.0-beta7.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:02 AM Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> Please vote on releasing these packages as HttpCore 5.0-beta7.
> The vote is open for the at least 72 hours, and only votes from
> HttpComponents PMC members are binding. The vote
> [x] +1 Release the packages as HttpCore 5.0-beta7
On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 09:01 +0100, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> Please vote on releasing these packages as HttpCore 5.0-beta7.
> The vote is open for the at least 72 hours, and only votes from
> HttpComponents PMC members are binding. The vote
On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 09:06 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I think VOTE emails should/must refer to sources on Apache
> repositories
> (Git-Wip/GitBox) as opposed to GitHub. May you please update this
> VOTE
> thread with such references?
>
Hi Gary
Our repos are dual-hosted. The repository at
+1
>From the git tag and running with:
Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3;
2018-10-24T14:41:47-04:00)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.0\bin\..
Java version: 11.0.2, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: C:\Program
Files\Java\jdk-11.0.2
Default locale: en_US,
I think VOTE emails should/must refer to sources on Apache repositories
(Git-Wip/GitBox) as opposed to GitHub. May you please update this VOTE
thread with such references?
Gary
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:01 AM Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> Please vote on releasing these packages as HttpCore
Please vote on releasing these packages as HttpCore 5.0-beta7.
The vote is open for the at least 72 hours, and only votes from
HttpComponents PMC members are binding. The vote passes if at least
three binding +1 votes are cast and there are more +1 than -1 votes.
Release notes:
