Github user xiaohu-zhang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/69
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
Github user xiaohu-zhang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/68
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/67
1. yes,all the time out task is executed by a separate thread. but I dont
think IOEventHandler need to synchronization because every channel has
difference IOEventHandler instance
GitHub user xiaohu-zhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/69
HTTPCORE-535
if workerCount is power of two , use &(workerCount -1 ) achieve mod
workerCount funciton
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by run
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/106
thank you
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user xiaohu-zhang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/106
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/67
1. testTimeoutInSSecond method in class TestHashedWheelTimer should rename
to testTimeoutInSecond ,I dont have permission to push to your branch.
2.why delete
if (isWindows
GitHub user xiaohu-zhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/106
HTTPCLIENT-1928
warning:IgnoreCompelteExceptonFutureCallback should be in
org.apache.hc.core5.concurrent package in httpcore5 project.put here
just for pass the cli check
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/68
yes.it has a little useful only when connections less than worker
thread,and is not anticipate by user before.
just tiny improvement
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/68
what if can not anticipate ?lazy init is little useful in
performanceãAlso the code can be modified do not use instanceof .after all ,
it depends on you
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/68
when use few connections,for example ,use always one connection in
connection pool each time(), or no http connection used when project
started.framework can use less thread
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/68
there is somthing wrong with the code ,let me correct it first
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
GitHub user xiaohu-zhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/68
HTTPCORE-532
IOReactor thread can be lazy started
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/xiaohu-zhang/httpcomponents
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/67
that is ok.Look forward to your reply.If anything wrong,let me know.If
license is not ok,I can write it
by my self
GitHub user xiaohu-zhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/67
HTTPCORE-484 use TimeWheel algorithm to deal with time out
HashedWheelTimer and related util classes are copied from netty
framework with tiny changes.
You can merge this pull
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/66
I wil try to solve it and pass ut then pr
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
Github user xiaohu-zhang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/66
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/66
thank you,you are so kind. but there also lots of checksytle bugs in the
pr.
It is not ok to waste your time to cover for meãI will try to solve it
tomorrow. thank you very
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/66
I don't familiar with git and github.Please help me ,thank you very
much,thank you !!
when at TimeWheel branch ,I use git rebase master ,there will be a lot of
conflict
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/66
should I use command :
git rebase -i HEAD~99 and deal with the conflict?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
GitHub user xiaohu-zhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/66
Use TimeWheel algorithm instead of loop when check timeout
HashedWheelTimer and related util classes are copied from netty framework
with tiny changes.
use TimeWheel algorithm
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/51
thank you
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user xiaohu-zhang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/51
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
GitHub user xiaohu-zhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/51
Check connecttimeout when SelectionKey.OP_CONNECT event happend
related to HTTPCORE-488
InternalConnectChannel onTimeout should also invoke close method
You can merge this pull
Github user xiaohu-zhang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/50
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/50
thank youï¼the commit is ok to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/50
this change is not related to HTTPCORE-484
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user xiaohu-zhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/50
It is the change related to HTTPCORE-486.10 is an arbitrary value.In my
test ,loop 10 times
will take less than 3ms usually. 10 is also the value netty used
GitHub user xiaohu-zhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-core/pull/50
setting time limit on processPending methods
setting time limit to avoid the SingleCoreIOReactor's time be exhausted
and then block the remaining work to do.
You can merge
29 matches
Mail list logo
