Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

We shouldn't block either branch releasing for the other. 1.3.0 should be released when someone volunteers to pick it up and drive the release. Alan. Lefty Leverenz November 11, 2015 at 23:03 Should 1.3.0 be released at the same time, or even before 2.0.0? --

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

Should 1.3.0 be released at the same time, or even before 2.0.0? -- Lefty On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > The stated plan for 2.0 when we created branch-1 was to be able to release > more aggressively from master. As Xuefu points out we've added a lot of > code and feature

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

The stated plan for 2.0 when we created branch-1 was to be able to release more aggressively from master. As Xuefu points out we've added a lot of code and features. I'm +1 for having a 2.0 release soon, but we should be very clear with users that many of the new features are in alpha or beta

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

The project bylaws define the procedure for approving a release plan and electing a release manager. Here's a link in case you want to review that: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Bylaws On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Thejas Nair wrote: > +1 > It would be good to let users p

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

> Are these all external docs I.e. wiki? Yes, the TODOC# labels are for wikidocs. -- Lefty On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Sergey Shelukhin wrote: > Also the new Metrics system. > > On 15/11/11, 17:14, "Sergey Shelukhin" wrote: > > >Also, HPL/SQL (I am going thru the commit list). > > > >On

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

Also the new Metrics system. On 15/11/11, 17:14, "Sergey Shelukhin" wrote: >Also, HPL/SQL (I am going thru the commit list). > >On 15/11/11, 17:12, "Sergey Shelukhin" wrote: > >>There are the following features, with projected state by the time of the >>release: >>- LLAP - first version that is

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

Also, HPL/SQL (I am going thru the commit list). On 15/11/11, 17:12, "Sergey Shelukhin" wrote: >There are the following features, with projected state by the time of the >release: >- LLAP - first version that is production ready, with some missing >features (e.g. ACID support). >- HBase metastor

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

There are the following features, with projected state by the time of the release: - LLAP - first version that is production ready, with some missing features (e.g. ACID support). - HBase metastore - first version, at alpha stage, i.e. might not be production ready. - Beeline-based CLI replacement.

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

I will look into making an overview. Yes, DOC JIRAs would need to be addressed too. Are these all external docs I.e. wiki? On 15/11/10, 18:49, "Lefty Leverenz" wrote: >The overview could go into the wiki when the time comes, along with 38 or >more doc fixes (which I'm sure people will rush to f

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

The overview could go into the wiki when the time comes, along with 38 or more doc fixes (which I'm sure people will rush to finish before the release): TODOC2.0 . -- Le

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

I understand that there have been a lot of things that have been added or merged to master. However, I think many of us has no clear picture where things are, especially about new features and their stability/usability. Thus, I think it would be great if someone can give an high-level overview on w

Re: [DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

+1 It would be good to let users play with some of the new features and give feedback. Regarding the vote, we don't have a precedent for conducting that for a release proposal. So this discussion thread should be sufficient, unless someone feels otherwise. There will certainly be a vote on the RC.

[DISCUSS] the first Hive 2 release

Hi. I would like to start the discussion about the first Hive 2 release and volunteer to be a release manager. The branch has existed for a while and has a lot of new exciting features. If there are no objections, I’ll start a VOTE thread soon. Please mark the unfinished features that you’d like