David Mollitor created HIVE-21469:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: Review of ZooKeeperHiveLockManager
                 Key: HIVE-21469
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21469
             Project: Hive
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Locking
    Affects Versions: 4.0.0, 3.2.0
            Reporter: David Mollitor
            Assignee: David Mollitor
         Attachments: HIVE-21469.1.patch

A lot of sins in this class to resolve:

{code:java}
  @Override
  public void setContext(HiveLockManagerCtx ctx) throws LockException {
 try {
      curatorFramework = CuratorFrameworkSingleton.getInstance(conf);
      parent = conf.getVar(HiveConf.ConfVars.HIVE_ZOOKEEPER_NAMESPACE);
      try{
        curatorFramework.create().withMode(CreateMode.PERSISTENT).forPath("/" + 
 parent, new byte[0]);
      } catch (Exception e) {
        // ignore if the parent already exists
        if (!(e instanceof KeeperException) || ((KeeperException)e).code() != 
KeeperException.Code.NODEEXISTS) {
          LOG.warn("Unexpected ZK exception when creating parent node /" + 
parent, e);
        }
      }
{code}

Every time a new session is created and this {{setContext}} method is called, 
it attempts to create the root node.  I have seen that, even though the root 
node exists, an create node action is written to the ZK logs.  Check first if 
the node exists before trying to create it.

{code:java}
      try {
        curatorFramework.delete().forPath(zLock.getPath());
      } catch (InterruptedException ie) {
        curatorFramework.delete().forPath(zLock.getPath());
      }
{code}

There has historically been a quite a few bugs regarding leaked locks.  The 
Driver will signal the session {{Thread}} by performing an interrupt.  That 
interrupt can happen any time and it can kill a create/delete action within the 
ZK framework.  We can see one example of workaround for this.  If the ZK action 
is interrupted, simply do it again.  Well, what if it's interrupted yet again?  
The lock will be leaked anyway.  Also, when the {{InterruptedException}} is 
caught in the try block, the thread's interrupted flag is cleared.  The flag is 
not reset in this code and therefore we lose the fact that this thread has been 
interrupted.

{code:java}
        if (tryNum > 1) {
          Thread.sleep(sleepTime);
        }
        unlockPrimitive(hiveLock, parent, curatorFramework);
        break;
      } catch (Exception e) {
        if (tryNum >= numRetriesForUnLock) {
          String name = ((ZooKeeperHiveLock)hiveLock).getPath();
          throw new LockException("Node " + name + " can not be deleted after " 
+ numRetriesForUnLock + " attempts.",
              e);
        }
      }
{code}

... related... the sleep here may be interrupted, but we still need to delete 
the lock (again, for fear of leaking it).  This sleep should be 
uninterruptible.  If we need to get the lock deleted, and there's a problem, 
interrupting the sleep will cause the code to eventually exit and locks will be 
leaked.

It also requires a bunch more TLC.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to